Jump to content
Computer Audiophile

Fyper

  • Content count

    110
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Fyper

  • Rank
    Freshman Member

Recent Profile Visitors

2,195 profile views
  1. This sounds strange to me. If the only argument in favor of USB against dual AES is that USB is more recent or that you can't go above 24/192, it's quite a poor argument coming from "DCS designers"... What I understand there is that if I don't mind old standards and/or I don't listen to higher formats than 24/192 or DSD dop64, I'm fine with dual AES... Sounds Like a poor way to push people to upgrade to USB (for a fee).
  2. Teac 10MHz clock : CG - 10M

    No I don't mean the Ref10 but the MC3+USB. More and more DACs have a 10M input (no need to use a word clock between the ref clock and the DAC. Therefore you can compare reclocking and master clocking with same DAC. Since the price tags of the MC3 and this TEAC is close, I'd imagine that the reclocking done by the Mutec would give a result comparable to the master clocking of the TEAC. Another way to say would be : if the TEAC Ref clock is used as a master clock on the MC3+USB, I wouldn't expect an improvement compared to the MC3+USB alone. I'd think the REF10 is way better than the TEAC.
  3. Teac 10MHz clock : CG - 10M

    How does it compare to a Mutec MC3+ USB ? About the same price... looking forward to reading some comparisons.
  4. MQA and the Sponsor Wars

    Sorry to come back to that so late in the discussion. And yes it's been said many times but still. There is a misunderstanding there. The target for MQA is not the people, but the Majors. If they have the majors they will have everything upstream (studios, artists) and downstream (streaming companies, hardware manufacturers). This is where they will make their money and control the market. What their comm. and their agents may tell the people is just to get us prepared to what may come, and accept it, better: embrace it. That kind of approach has been used countless times. Again, it has nothing to do with how it sounds, or whether we like it or not. It is rather simple: in the future, if there remains alternatives to proprietary MQA on the market for streaming and downloading DRM free uncompressed music, both in Red book and in High Res (including DSD), then everyone will make their choices and I wish success to MQA. I hope I’m wrong but that may not be how the MQA boys and the majors see it…
  5. Post EQ measurements would show objectively the effectiveness of the suggested correction, and could be the starting point of an iterative correction process if the customer so desires. Not that optional for a remote service IMHO.
  6. Theoretically: yes. From a clocking/re-clocking point of view. But it seems the PSU of the MC3+usb is better than the MC3+. So there is only one way to be certain...
  7. MQA is Vaporware

    That is intriguing. Of course I'll fight for this even though I won't buy the album, I'll fight for all of them whether I like the music or not, whether it sounds good or not. The (maybe irrational) fear is that there might be a take over of the PCM standard by a private company, which may thus have significant control of much of process, from production to sale. Some players and consumers in that chain may be happy to let go the little influence they have against something more interesting to them, but many are not. And yes there is no proof that this may happen. May I say that when there is proof it's too late. And yes it's only music and a hobby. But this pattern has been repeating itself in so many other areas at so many other levels that it's a question of principle, not money, not self-interest. The same way some feel the need to balance a discussion for the sake of that discussion, I feel the need to fight for some core principles even if it's not related to my personal interest. Sorry, got carried away....:-)
  8. Mutec MC-3+

    You could try to plug you MC3+ and compare ?
  9. Mutec MC-3+

    Not sure I understand this: if an external clock is used, then no work is required from the input section of the DAC - PLL, that work is done by the external clock. Same (better actually) if the source and the DAC are synced: no reclocking and/or DAC pll work is required. The reclocking concept, to me, comes from the fact that most sources and DACs don't offer a wordclock inputs (even more true when done through usb), therefore you've to tap the timing info directly from the PCM flow, whereas it takes a different path, and is being reclocked, when going from source to DAC through a master clock. Some then say that this different path may actually add more jitter than leaving it as is, but I can assure you that it's not the case in my system. Put differently : where reclocking is relevant, alternative external clocking is de facto relevant. I don't know which method is more efficient or if a 10M clock makes a difference, but intuitively I'd think that when all parts of a system are synced, by the best possible clock, it should have an edge.
  10. MQA is Vaporware

    I quite agree with that but I think that wasn't your original point. If I understood well, your point was that the development of streaming would make the catalog of available titles poorer. And I'm saying that if there is an identified demand (and therefore profit) for a record, streaming or no streaming, it'll be made available to the market.
  11. MQA is Vaporware

    No, as said I think it'll disappear, unless there is enough demand for it. I can imagine someone buying the majors' catalog of unsold "rarities" for a few bucks and put them back on the market to see if there is hunger for it. I actually I don't see what prevents it from happening today (making those available for download or streaming) a part from the fact that there is not enough demand for it. I failed to see how streaming influence that.
  12. MQA is Vaporware

    Nevermind
  13. Mutec MC-3+

    I wouldn't be so sure about the uselessness of a 10M clock in Hifi. The MC 3+usb can already be used as a master clock and there are still a few sources and DACs out there which can benefit from that: synchronising both source and DAC on the same clock through wordclock inputs/outputs. (Aurender, Mytek, Esoteric, DCS, ...) If would be interesting, by the way, to compare the outcome, for the systems which can do both reclocking and synchronising. If MUTEC were to finally put on the market a 10M clock able to outperform the current Rubidum 10M clocks for a lower price, I wouldn't be the only one to consider it. And if such a clock could improve significantly a MC3+ (usb or not), I feel many out there would look into it. We'll see!
  14. MQA is Vaporware

    Nothing personal Judd :-) But I kind of like the idea of not subscribing to streaming providers and own your files to then subscribe remote storage and store these files in a place that you don't own => in the end it's the same : you stop paying, you've nothing. :-) (unless it's a remote back up of your local HDrives...)
  15. MQA is Vaporware

    Isn't that the laws of supply and demand? Eventually, streaming or no streaming, if there is a market for the music you like (the one difficult to find), then some clever mind will put it back on the market. If there never was a market for that music, then you benefited from marketing glitches of the record companies back in the day. They'll do some more in the future and they'll likely stay in the catalog even if streamed by 2 people in the world (because it won't cost them anything to do so and it'll inflate the catalog).
×