Popular Post KeenObserver Posted December 9, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted December 9, 2018 It seems that we have reached a point in digital audio where we are arguing at the angels on the head of a pin level. We are talking at 120 or 140 db level down or one ten thousandth percent difference. I realize that constantly striving to better a product is a good thing, and that a constant series of improvements may ultimately realize a measurable gain, but arguing about an infinitesimally small distortion amount that could not be discerned by any human being is a bit much. Digital video is a much more complex issue and has further to go. esldude, wgscott and Arpiben 3 Boycott Warner Boycott Tidal Boycott Roon Boycott Lenbrook Link to comment
fas42 Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 On the playback side - yes for the theoretical, no for the practical. That is, it's trivial to achieve "mind-boggling", easily measurable numbers; but mighty difficult to guarantee a real world implementation that subjectively 'measures up'. The major failing is the reticence for most to concern themselves with system wide integrity - with digital, this is absolutely essential to get right; the constant focusing on single parameter excellence, as is often the case, is classic "can't see the forest for the trees" thinking ... Link to comment
sandyk Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 45 minutes ago, KeenObserver said: It seems that we have reached a point in digital audio where we are arguing at the angels on the head of a pin level There can often be a world of difference between Digital Audio from a top notch hardware player, and in an unfriendly environment such as an electrically noisy computer implementation with RF/EMI up into the UHF DTV region, even outside the computer ! That's where the majority of the action is at the moment , as evidenced by the large threads from Rajiv, Uptone forum etc. Albrecht 1 How a Digital Audio file sounds, or a Digital Video file looks, is governed to a large extent by the Power Supply area. All that Identical Checksums gives is the possibility of REGENERATING the file to close to that of the original file. PROFILE UPDATED 13-11-2020 Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 how many angels are pinheads, anyway? for "mature science," substitute "over-ripe engineering effort" digital audio includes DSP for speakers/rooms - that is where the blankets will be lifted (to paraphrase one worthy) Link to comment
esldude Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 1 hour ago, sandyk said: There can often be a world of difference between Digital Audio from a top notch hardware player, and in an unfriendly environment such as an electrically noisy computer implementation with RF/EMI up into the UHF DTV region, even outside the computer ! That's where the majority of the action is at the moment , as evidenced by the large threads from Rajiv, Uptone forum etc. Another interpretation of where the action is. Where there's smoke there's fire. Only we don't know what is burning. And always keep in mind: Cognitive biases, like seeing optical illusions are a sign of a normally functioning brain. We all have them, it’s nothing to be ashamed about, but it is something that affects our objective evaluation of reality. Link to comment
sandyk Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 16 minutes ago, esldude said: Another interpretation of where the action is. Where there's smoke there's fire. Only we don't know what is burning. A huge 490 page thread in the Music Servers section of the forum is where much of the REAL action is, not in the General Forum area where most of the " If we can't measure it, it doesn't exist" brigade mainly hang out, regurgitating yellowing pages from middle to late 20th century textbooks ! KeenObserver and look&listen 1 1 How a Digital Audio file sounds, or a Digital Video file looks, is governed to a large extent by the Power Supply area. All that Identical Checksums gives is the possibility of REGENERATING the file to close to that of the original file. PROFILE UPDATED 13-11-2020 Link to comment
audiventory Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 3 hours ago, KeenObserver said: It seems that we have reached a point in digital audio where we are arguing at the angels on the head of a pin level. We are talking at 120 or 140 db level down or one ten thousandth percent difference. We know about psychoacoustics too little. Read that we have a lack in audio really now: https://samplerateconverter.com/content/where-limit-audio-quality buonassi 1 AuI ConverteR 48x44 - HD audio converter/optimizer for DAC of high resolution files ISO, DSF, DFF (1-bit/D64/128/256/512/1024), wav, flac, aiff, alac, safe CD ripper to PCM/DSF, Seamless Album Conversion, AIFF, WAV, FLAC, DSF metadata editor, Mac & WindowsOffline conversion save energy and nature Link to comment
Popular Post esldude Posted December 9, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted December 9, 2018 Digital recording and reproduction is mature science yes. It can be end to end transparent to human listeners from ADC to DAC. Now the reason we don't have full lifelike reproduction has nothing to do with any failings in digital audio. It has to do with limitations of transducers. It has to do with limitations of two channel recording and reproduction. Or 5 channel recordings and reproduction. We aren't currently able to create a sonic hologram of the original soundspace. Additional channels and research are allowing a result humans perceive as closer to the original (or created) soundspace. Whether it ever gets there or not I don't know. It is not a problem of digital that is keeping us back. DSP may one day solve it or get us closer to the real sound. wgscott, phosphorein, Fokus and 5 others 6 2 And always keep in mind: Cognitive biases, like seeing optical illusions are a sign of a normally functioning brain. We all have them, it’s nothing to be ashamed about, but it is something that affects our objective evaluation of reality. Link to comment
Popular Post pkane2001 Posted December 9, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted December 9, 2018 45 minutes ago, sandyk said: A huge 490 page thread in the Music Servers section of the forum is where much of the REAL action is That whole thread is easily explained by the results of this study: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Running-head-%3A-THE-REPEATED-RECORDING-ILLUSION-1-%3A-Anglada-Tort-Goldsmiths Short summary: 75% of listeners heard music as different when told in advance that it was different, including trained musicians. Even though the same music was played. Bias anyone? mansr, KeenObserver, sarvsa and 8 others 8 2 1 -Paul DeltaWave, DISTORT, Earful, PKHarmonic, new: Multitone Analyzer Link to comment
sandyk Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 18 minutes ago, pkane2001 said: That whole thread is easily explained by the results of this study: How about giving a little credit to the bulk of the forum members who are well aware of Expectation Bias, which also applies even more to those who don't expect to hear any difference because of their employment background ? How a Digital Audio file sounds, or a Digital Video file looks, is governed to a large extent by the Power Supply area. All that Identical Checksums gives is the possibility of REGENERATING the file to close to that of the original file. PROFILE UPDATED 13-11-2020 Link to comment
Popular Post Ralf11 Posted December 9, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted December 9, 2018 A huge 490 page thread in the Music Servers section of the forum is where much of the REAL Expectation Bias is esldude, crenca, sarvsa and 3 others 5 1 Link to comment
fas42 Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 56 minutes ago, esldude said: Now the reason we don't have full lifelike reproduction has nothing to do with any failings in digital audio. It has to do with limitations of transducers. It has to do with limitations of two channel recording and reproduction. Or 5 channel recordings and reproduction. We aren't currently able to create a sonic hologram of the original soundspace. Additional channels and research are allowing a result humans perceive as closer to the original (or created) soundspace. Whether it ever gets there or not I don't know. It is not a problem of digital that is keeping us back. DSP may one day solve it or get us closer to the real sound. None of this is correct. Tranducers are fine, 2 channel is fine - what is lacking are the necessary levels of integrity of the end system; and because this is currently considered relatively unimportant we have the dilemma of the state of much ambitious audio these days. People have created "sonic holograms" for decades - but usually don't progress what they have beyond a personal 'statement', which ultimately folds when life events overtake their situation. The desire by most to just play with technology as a means to these ends is distracting nearly all from the better methods - and there are little signs of this changing, in the consumers. Luckily, the more ambitious designers and builders of gear are bit by bit improving what counts, meaning that we are getting closer, with the raw components. DSP can never solve inherent problems with the quality of the playback chain - though it can achieve what's necessary as a side effect to employing this approach; "sharing the load" is a very effective technique. sandyk and KeenObserver 1 1 Link to comment
sandyk Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 Well recorded material is capable of providing quite a deal of height and depth of image information from just 2 front speakers , as well as a good amount of ambience provided that the playback equipment is above average. Even quite a bit of multi channel material can do this too when down converted to Stereo. A good example of this is "The Storm" from Chesky. Teresa 1 How a Digital Audio file sounds, or a Digital Video file looks, is governed to a large extent by the Power Supply area. All that Identical Checksums gives is the possibility of REGENERATING the file to close to that of the original file. PROFILE UPDATED 13-11-2020 Link to comment
Popular Post esldude Posted December 9, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted December 9, 2018 2 hours ago, sandyk said: How about giving a little credit to the bulk of the forum members who are well aware of Expectation Bias, which also applies even more to those who don't expect to hear any difference because of their employment background ? Because like you've seen written thousands of times, being aware of expectation bias in no way protects you from falling afoul of it if you continue with sighted listening impressions. It would be like knowing that 3 packs of cigarettes a day can increase cancer risks, but continuing to smoke as if that knowledge would protect you from cancer. It is a methodology that does not work. pkane2001, mansr, crenca and 3 others 4 2 And always keep in mind: Cognitive biases, like seeing optical illusions are a sign of a normally functioning brain. We all have them, it’s nothing to be ashamed about, but it is something that affects our objective evaluation of reality. Link to comment
Popular Post esldude Posted December 9, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted December 9, 2018 1 hour ago, fas42 said: None of this is correct. Tranducers are fine, 2 channel is fine - what is lacking are the necessary levels of integrity of the end system; and because this is currently considered relatively unimportant we have the dilemma of the state of much ambitious audio these days. People have created "sonic holograms" for decades - but usually don't progress what they have beyond a personal 'statement', which ultimately folds when life events overtake their situation. The desire by most to just play with technology as a means to these ends is distracting nearly all from the better methods - and there are little signs of this changing, in the consumers. Luckily, the more ambitious designers and builders of gear are bit by bit improving what counts, meaning that we are getting closer, with the raw components. DSP can never solve inherent problems with the quality of the playback chain - though it can achieve what's necessary as a side effect to employing this approach; "sharing the load" is a very effective technique. Balderdash! Nothing more. KeenObserver and crenca 2 And always keep in mind: Cognitive biases, like seeing optical illusions are a sign of a normally functioning brain. We all have them, it’s nothing to be ashamed about, but it is something that affects our objective evaluation of reality. Link to comment
sandyk Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 15 minutes ago, esldude said: Because like you've seen written thousands of times, being aware of expectation bias in no way protects you from falling afoul of it if you continue with sighted listening impressions. I have posted on numerous occasions that our equipment comparison sessions with Audiophile Neuroscience and other friends are performed under non sighted conditions ! Having virtually all of the gear already powered up also assists in this respect , as well as ensuring optimum performance and reducing delays. How a Digital Audio file sounds, or a Digital Video file looks, is governed to a large extent by the Power Supply area. All that Identical Checksums gives is the possibility of REGENERATING the file to close to that of the original file. PROFILE UPDATED 13-11-2020 Link to comment
Popular Post pkane2001 Posted December 9, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted December 9, 2018 2 hours ago, sandyk said: How about giving a little credit to the bulk of the forum members who are well aware of Expectation Bias, which also applies even more to those who don't expect to hear any difference because of their employment background ? Right. So if all conclusions are subject to expectation bias, maybe you should give measurements a little more credit, since they are not? Ralf11 and wgscott 2 -Paul DeltaWave, DISTORT, Earful, PKHarmonic, new: Multitone Analyzer Link to comment
Popular Post pkane2001 Posted December 9, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted December 9, 2018 37 minutes ago, sandyk said: I have posted on numerous occasions that our equipment comparison sessions with Audiophile Neuroscience and other friends are performed under non sighted conditions ! And this helps to justify that 490 page thread, how exactly? The thread that starts with a statement that nobody can: Demand proof Require a specific methodology Require measurements. KeenObserver, esldude, crenca and 1 other 3 1 -Paul DeltaWave, DISTORT, Earful, PKHarmonic, new: Multitone Analyzer Link to comment
sandyk Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 29 minutes ago, pkane2001 said: And this helps to justify that 490 page thread, how exactly? The thread that starts with a statement that nobody can: Demand proof Require a specific methodology Require measurements. .You had your chance with the rebuttal thread, but it appears to have just about fizzled out after several members from both sides, INCLUDING the OP came to some consensus ! The original thread made it clear that it wasn't a measurements thread, and that the participants were not qualified to provide the measurements you so desperately crave. KeenObserver and Teresa 1 1 How a Digital Audio file sounds, or a Digital Video file looks, is governed to a large extent by the Power Supply area. All that Identical Checksums gives is the possibility of REGENERATING the file to close to that of the original file. PROFILE UPDATED 13-11-2020 Link to comment
sandyk Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 1 hour ago, pkane2001 said: Right. So if all conclusions are subject to expectation bias, maybe you should give measurements a little more credit, since they are not? I have always welcomed appropriate measurements as well, especially for Preamps and Power Amplifiers wherever possible, but they are NOT the " be all, end all". Teresa 1 How a Digital Audio file sounds, or a Digital Video file looks, is governed to a large extent by the Power Supply area. All that Identical Checksums gives is the possibility of REGENERATING the file to close to that of the original file. PROFILE UPDATED 13-11-2020 Link to comment
pkane2001 Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 4 hours ago, sandyk said: .You had your chance with the rebuttal thread, but it appears to have just about fizzled out after several members from both sides, INCLUDING the OP came to some consensus ! The original thread made it clear that it wasn't a measurements thread, and that the participants were not qualified to provide the measurements you so desperately crave. So you are moderating this one? As I recall, you brought up the other thread, I just responded. -Paul DeltaWave, DISTORT, Earful, PKHarmonic, new: Multitone Analyzer Link to comment
Popular Post mansr Posted December 9, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted December 9, 2018 5 hours ago, sandyk said: I have always welcomed appropriate measurements By appropriate, I take it you mean ones that agree with your pre-conceived ideas. pkane2001, KeenObserver and wgscott 1 2 Link to comment
Popular Post kumakuma Posted December 9, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted December 9, 2018 10 hours ago, sandyk said: How about giving a little credit to the bulk of the forum members who are well aware of Expectation Bias, which also applies even more to those who don't expect to hear any difference because of their employment background ? Differences so minor that they only appear if you believe in them aren't worth worrying about. Ralf11 and wgscott 1 1 Sometimes it's like someone took a knife, baby Edgy and dull and cut a six inch valley Through the middle of my skull Link to comment
sandyk Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 2 hours ago, kumakuma said: Differences so minor that they only appear if you believe in them aren't worth worrying about. These small differences all add up. However, keep burying your head in the sand , Sunshine ! You are obviously deliriously happy with the lacklustre set up you are already using. wgscott and KeenObserver 2 How a Digital Audio file sounds, or a Digital Video file looks, is governed to a large extent by the Power Supply area. All that Identical Checksums gives is the possibility of REGENERATING the file to close to that of the original file. PROFILE UPDATED 13-11-2020 Link to comment
sandyk Posted December 9, 2018 Share Posted December 9, 2018 4 hours ago, mansr said: By appropriate, I take it you mean ones that agree with your pre-conceived ideas. 4 hours ago, mansr said: By appropriate, I take it you mean ones that agree with your pre-conceived ideas. No. I am not you !!! How a Digital Audio file sounds, or a Digital Video file looks, is governed to a large extent by the Power Supply area. All that Identical Checksums gives is the possibility of REGENERATING the file to close to that of the original file. PROFILE UPDATED 13-11-2020 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now