Jump to content
IGNORED

Article: AURALiC ARIES G2 Review


Recommended Posts

On 10/20/2018 at 10:08 AM, Miska said:

 

Even my DACs have more (RME ADI-2)...

 

I don't see an Ethernet connector on the ADI-2. The point is, I could use the Auralic closer to the DAC with Ethernet rather than use 25m of AES3 ATM.

 

I like this spec comment from the Auralic site:

Streaming File Formats

Lossless: AIFF, ALAC, APE, DIFF, DSF, FLAC, OGG, WAV and WV
Lossy: AAC, MP3, MQA and WMA

 

@The Computer Audiophile were there any technical problems, I read when the G2 was released a fair bit of instability issues, that was a while ago.

AS Profile Equipment List        Say NO to MQA

Link to comment
9 hours ago, Doak said:

Xuanqian Wang’s (aka: “Mr. Auralic”) take on SQ differences between Auralic models:

 

“Galvanic isolation contributes a lot to sound quality because they isolate the digital noise generated by processing circuit. There is no galvanic isolation in either ARIES G1 or VEGA G1 so the sound quality of G1 are not comparable to G2, only software features are the same.

My personal rating of the sound quality for different devices are as below:

 

2

 

My God, this is even worse!. Since you can get galvanic isolation on the USB with a Silanna chip for less than $100.  

https://hifimediy.com/high-speed-usb-isolator-480Mbps

 

I guess,  getting that chip embedded must cost less. 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
4 hours ago, Cortes said:

 

My God, this is even worse!. Since you can get galvanic isolation on the USB with a Silanna chip for less than $100.  

https://hifimediy.com/high-speed-usb-isolator-480Mbps

 

I guess,  getting that chip embedded must cost less. 

 

 

 

 

 

This G2 probably isn’t the product for you. 

Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems AudiophileStyleStickerWhite2.0.png AudiophileStyleStickerWhite7.1.4.png

Link to comment
6 hours ago, One and a half said:

I don't see an Ethernet connector on the ADI-2. The point is, I could use the Auralic closer to the DAC with Ethernet rather than use 25m of AES3 ATM.

 

I like this spec comment from the Auralic site:

Streaming File Formats

Lossless: AIFF, ALAC, APE, DIFF, DSF, FLAC, OGG, WAV and WV
Lossy: AAC, MP3, MQA and WMA

 

@The Computer Audiophile were there any technical problems, I read when the G2 was released a fair bit of instability issues, that was a while ago.

 

I didn’t run into any problems. 

 

I had an Aries G2 last year at this time and ran into some little quirks. I’d say things have been ironed out now. 

Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems AudiophileStyleStickerWhite2.0.png AudiophileStyleStickerWhite7.1.4.png

Link to comment

I was very happy to find this review on Aries G2. However, without a comparison to the DCS Network Bridge or the internal renderer of DCS Rossini I cannot take any advantage of this review (of course a comparision with other streamer/servers such as Innuos Zenith SE would also be useful).

 

Of course the sound is good (as with most expensive gears) but is it good enough to verify its price tag and are there better options in the market?

Link to comment
18 minutes ago, Schelol said:

I was very happy to find this review on Aries G2. However, without a comparison to the DCS Network Bridge or the internal renderer of DCS Rossini I cannot take any advantage of this review (of course a comparision with other streamer/servers such as Innuos Zenith SE would also be useful).

 

Of course the sound is good (as with most expensive gears) but is it good enough to verify its price tag and are there better options in the market?

Given the number of combinations, do you think such a comparison would actually help you? I usually find such comparisons are a clap trap that people think they want but when it comes down to it there are so many variables it doesn’t really help. 

 

For example, does it help you if I compare several D to D converters without the same DAC as you use? Givenmy redults with different DACs in this review I believe not. 

Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems AudiophileStyleStickerWhite2.0.png AudiophileStyleStickerWhite7.1.4.png

Link to comment
2 hours ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

Given the number of combinations, do you think such a comparison would actually help you? I usually find such comparisons are a clap trap that people think they want but when it comes down to it there are so many variables it doesn’t really help. 

 

For example, does it help you if I compare several D to D converters without the same DAC as you use? Givenmy redults with different DACs in this review I believe not. 

 

I do not think so. The dCS Network Bridge does not have USB output. So you can easily compare the Bridge to G2 with AES or SPDIF into the SAME DAC. When the DAC gets a better input signal by the better D-D converter it will sound better. You do net need a certain DAC of.a certain customer for evaluation.

 

Matt

"I want to know why the musicians are on stage, not where". (John Farlowe)

 

Link to comment
12 minutes ago, matthias said:

 

I do not think so. The dCS Network Bridge does not have USB output. So you can easily compare the Bridge to G2 with AES or SPDIF into the SAME DAC. When the DAC gets a better input signal by the better D-D converter it will sound better. You do net need a certain DAC of.a certain customer for evaluation.

 

Matt

Why stop with just the Bridge?

Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems AudiophileStyleStickerWhite2.0.png AudiophileStyleStickerWhite7.1.4.png

Link to comment
10 hours ago, Cortes said:

 

My God, this is even worse!. Since you can get galvanic isolation on the USB with a Silanna chip for less than $100.  

https://hifimediy.com/high-speed-usb-isolator-480Mbps

 

I guess,  getting that chip embedded must cost less. 

 

 

I must say the this the comment I posted was made in the context of a larger discussion. Mr. Wang has indicated that there are other reasons for the G2 to sound  better than the G1.

Link to comment

Chris,

you do not need to answer, but please let me ask:

Why is it so difficult for you to compare devices?

Do you think you will hurt your sponsors?

In the end it will be a benefit for all to know in which points they can improve their gear.

 

Matt

"I want to know why the musicians are on stage, not where". (John Farlowe)

 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, matthias said:

Chris,

you do not need to answer, but please let me ask:

Why is it so difficult for you to compare devices?

Do you think you will hurt your sponsors?

In the end it will be a benefit for all to know in which points they can improve their gear.

 

Matt

I’ve done it in the recent past, but it’s never ending. You are a big D to D guy, so why stop with a couple? If i do a couple then people will ask for a third. It’s really never ending. 

 

Plus people are usually looking for an answer nobody can give them. 

Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems AudiophileStyleStickerWhite2.0.png AudiophileStyleStickerWhite7.1.4.png

Link to comment

In my opinion, D-D converters or digital transports can be easily compared (similar to other components). They differ in terms of transparency, dynamics, stage, PRAT, ..., ie regardless of the speakers, amps, or DACs used. 

 

A A/B comparison would be of great help for future buyers, especially with direct competitors such as DCS NB. But I understand why you not compare these products 

 

Link to comment
4 minutes ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

I’ve done it in the recent past, but it’s never ending. You are a big D to D guy, so why stop with a couple? If i do a couple then people will ask for a third. It’s really never ending. 

 

Plus people are usually looking for an answer nobody can give them. 

 

In the price range of the G2 there are two other great contenders which you have in your associated equipment. Nearly all people would be happy if they get a comparison vs. these two. I can not imagine to demand a comparison from a reviewer outside his associated equipment.

 

Matt

"I want to know why the musicians are on stage, not where". (John Farlowe)

 

Link to comment

Just for clarification:

Darko recently published a review about Audirvana for Windows. 

He compared vs. Roon and prefered Audirvana regarding SQ.

Now Roon have a reason to make their software better than Audirvana.

This is not bad for Roon.

 

Matt

 

"I want to know why the musicians are on stage, not where". (John Farlowe)

 

Link to comment
27 minutes ago, matthias said:

Just for clarification:

Darko recently published a review about Audirvana for Windows. 

He compared vs. Roon and prefered Audirvana regarding SQ.

Now Roon have a reason to make their software better than Audirvana.

This is not bad for Roon.

 

Matt

 

 

Funny enough, this is the beginning of the last piece of Darko, published today:

 

Keeping it honest: comparisons are the cornerstone of a good hi-fi review. Why? Because comparisons are also the cornerstone of the consumer decision process. Our decision trees tell us that it isn’t enough for us to enjoy the sound of a piece of audio gear in isolation. We also want to know if we might better enjoy something else.

In short: no A/B, no conclusion. No conclusion, no sale.

 

 

Link to comment
24 minutes ago, matthias said:

Just for clarification:

Darko recently published a review about Audirvana for Windows. 

He compared vs. Roon and prefered Audirvana regarding SQ.

Now Roon have a reason to make their software better than Audirvana.

This is not bad for Roon.

 

Matt

 

This would work if enough users wrote to Roon regarding their preferences, then Roon could change. Problem with that is, users like the current SQ of Roon and don’t want to change.

From what most reviews of equipment report, either the treble is better on device A and mids are better on B or something is better on one or the other and of course you can’t merge the two. 

Having a detailed comparison is often mired in detail that’s too confusing. There’s always going to be a combo that was missed.

Fair enough if there were only two D/D converters in the world, but there are hundreds, let alone DAC combos.

 

I use A+ as well as Roon, can use either, but lean to Roon due to its networking zone and metadata useability. A+ is on the warmer  side which matches the electronics , so for away from home A+ is preferred.

AS Profile Equipment List        Say NO to MQA

Link to comment

Hi Guys - I was out around town all day with my wife and daughter, responding when i could. I hope my responses don’t seem short or dismissive, but I think one could get that impression now that I look back.

 

The comparison topic comes up once in a while and I do them once in a while. I think in the EMM Labs DA2 DAC review I touched on differences between similar DACs. 

 

When I write reviews it’s much more of a creative process for me than the scientific process I use while listening to the product under review. When listening I have all kinds of notes and details and will compare to what I have on hand etc... But when I write I like to craft something different than my somewhat boring review process. 

 

It’s also part of what keeps me excited to write. Crafting the story of a product and my impressions of the product versus making sure I check all the boxes for all people reading. Yes I’d love to be able to please everyone but it just isn’t pleasant to write when thinking about what others want to read. I hope that comes across the right way in that I’m human and have to write for myself and hope others find value in the writing. 

 

Plus, I believe there is so much more to each product than sound quality. Yes it’s the most important thing to me but one should also consider the company, build quality, aesthetics, warranty, product support. When all of these are taken into consideration a product comparison becomes much more difficult. 

 

I know some people say sound quality is all that matters, but I suggest taking a step back to think about all the other items. Gor example, my old Spectral system sounded absolutely awesome and maybe the best I’ve heard. However it failed too many times and had to be sent back for repairs too often. A sond quality only comparison would be a disservice even though many people believe it’s really what they want to read about. 

 

 

Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems AudiophileStyleStickerWhite2.0.png AudiophileStyleStickerWhite7.1.4.png

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...