TxUSBultra or ISO Regen?

[Advieira]

I wanto to add a new item in my chain (sms200ultra>Vega).

My options:

A) - A used TXusbultra with master clock input with a cooper Y cable to use in my Sps500. US$ 920

B) - ISO-Regen new with a LPS-1. US$695

C) I could not order the lps1 and use my hdplex 200w to power isoregen. I would save US$ 350.

 

questions:

1 - does Tx is much better than isoregen?

2 - could hdplex give the same quality to isoregen like the LPs1?

 

Money is not a issue to decision here. 

[mozes]

If money is not an issue then why are you quoting the prices and savings?

Go for the tX without hesitation.

[Advieira]

On 20/03/2018 at 6:26 PM, mozes said:

If money is not an issue then why are you quoting the prices and savings?

Go for the tX without hesitation.

 

Goint to TX, I feel I am paying two times for the same clock board (SCLK-EX)... so, its not a matter of price, but pay more for something would not improve audio enough for the money.

[ElviaCaprice]

3 hours ago, Advieira said:

 

Goint to TX, I feel I am paying two times for the same clock board (SCLK-EX)... so, its not a matter of price, but pay more for something would not improve audio enough for the money.

The sCLK-EX is not the same clock board in the ISO Regen.  If you really want to leverage the value of the sCLK-EX, you would incorporate all four of it's clocking points to separate devices that would benefit from better clocking.  

The HDPlex is not a high end power supply.  Maybe with some added DIY, you could get it to be comparable.  

I find the ISO Regen a detriment to my SQ after incorporating the sCLK-EX into my server.  Your findings may differ?