adamdea Posted February 5, 2018 Share Posted February 5, 2018 The DSpeaker x4 is finally out. Its arrival has been announced as imminent for 2 years or so. https://webstore.vlsi.fi/epages/vlsi.sf/en_GB/?ObjectPath=/Shops/2015020901/Products/"Anti-Mode X4%2C Audio Processor%2C Country of Origin%3A FI%2C Taric%3A 85437006" I'm a big fan of the antimode which is a perfectly decent dac and adc with room correction and all sorts of bells and whistles for a very modest price. The X4 is about 4 times the price. It has more inputs (good) and a headphone out with some fancy dsp to (probably good) but its not clear what extra it brings to the party. One would like to think that the room correction algorythm was much better but the manual does not give much away. If it were comparable in price to the antimode I would be all over it like a rash but I see this as a competent dac/adc* plus about £2k or software, which had better be good. If anything my gripe with the antimode was that its drc is a bit too automated. You can tweak other bits of the dsp but there's not a whole lots you can do to analyse the antimode's room sweep (cf what you can see in REW) Anyway if anyone has seen this product or knows anyone who has heard or reviewed it do let me know. * this is not me damning it with faint praise that's about as far as my interest goes. Guidof 1 You are not a sound quality measurement device Link to comment
[email protected] Posted March 16, 2018 Share Posted March 16, 2018 Thanks adamdea Im quite interested in DRC as I have a problem with room mode. No doubt, The product like DSpeaker x4 is very interesting and useful, however, I dont want to sell my existing DAC, or to be more precise, I want to use seperate DAC, as my concern is DSpeaker x4 DAC quality. For the last 2 years, I have been using Bricasti M1 DAC which is quite great for 5k-league (Im gonna buy DAVE to upgrade) It could be great is there is a DRC device with usb INPUT and OUTPUT (DSD-enable), so tha I can use that to feed my DAC Thanks Aurender X100L w Plixir LPS -> TX_USBULTRA w LPS1.2> Bricasti m1 DAc -> IC RCA Kubala Emotion -> Lyric Ti100 Kt150 -> SC Kubala Emotion -> Pureaudio project Trio 15 Beyma + 2 Rel G2 Link to comment
adamdea Posted April 12, 2018 Author Share Posted April 12, 2018 Don’t know. Should be possible with an ordinary pc in line. Perhaps the x4 can do. The dspeaker antimode can do with optical. You are not a sound quality measurement device Link to comment
Kal Rubinson Posted April 12, 2018 Share Posted April 12, 2018 On 2/5/2018 at 12:15 PM, adamdea said: Anyway if anyone has seen this product or knows anyone who has heard or reviewed it do let me know. I've been promised one for review but, to date, I have not received it. Looks like a useful device, especially for those that do not use a PC in their system. nefilim 1 Kal Rubinson Senior Contributing Editor, Stereophile Link to comment
adamdea Posted April 13, 2018 Author Share Posted April 13, 2018 9 hours ago, Kal Rubinson said: I've been promised one for review but, to date, I have not received it. Looks like a useful device, especially for those that do not use a PC in their system. Absolutely. What I'm really interested in is whether the software has been advanced over that in the antimode. The price hike is very considerable (about 4-500%), taking one into trinnov/DEQX territory. For that I would want a lot more than one gets with the antimode. nefilim 1 You are not a sound quality measurement device Link to comment
Kal Rubinson Posted April 13, 2018 Share Posted April 13, 2018 2 hours ago, adamdea said: Absolutely. What I'm really interested in is whether the software has been advanced over that in the antimode. The price hike is very considerable (about 4-500%), taking one into trinnov/DEQX territory. For that I would want a lot more than one gets with the antimode. I agree. My original attraction was its support for multiple subs but whatever it is, we will not know until somebody one actually has one. Kal Rubinson Senior Contributing Editor, Stereophile Link to comment
RZangpo2 Posted April 18, 2018 Share Posted April 18, 2018 For me, the x4 has at least three advantages over the Anti-Mode 2.0: 1. Digital output sample rate same as input rate, not reduced to 48k. 2. Coaxial digital input; no more fussing with toslink cables (and in my case, elimination of AES/EBU -> toslink converter box). 3. Active crossover between sub and main speakers (the Anti-Mode 2.0 doesn't have this). Link to comment
Kal Rubinson Posted April 18, 2018 Share Posted April 18, 2018 4 hours ago, RZangpo2 said: Digital output sample rate same as input rate, not reduced to 48k. Up to 192kHz or DSD128 over DoP. Kal Rubinson Senior Contributing Editor, Stereophile Link to comment
RZangpo2 Posted April 20, 2018 Share Posted April 20, 2018 And also ... 4. Better specifications as a DAC/preamp, meaning possibly better sound. Link to comment
navrsale Posted July 3, 2018 Share Posted July 3, 2018 Nothing, absolutely nothing, can justify the msrp of $4000 skatbelt 1 Link to comment
thyname Posted August 10, 2018 Share Posted August 10, 2018 Can you still use your existing DAC with the X4, while at the same time avoiding double D/A/D/A convertion? Link to comment
adamdea Posted August 13, 2018 Author Share Posted August 13, 2018 On 8/10/2018 at 10:59 AM, thyname said: Can you still use your existing DAC with the X4, while at the same time avoiding double D/A/D/A convertion? Presumably - it has coax and optical s/pdif out. But if you aren't using it as a dac then it seems worse as a value for money proposition. You are not a sound quality measurement device Link to comment
pre Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 My X4 use case would be following - is this supported? - use predefined sound profile B in X4 - X4 in power up/ switch on to have profile B always as default profile (safe way ht-by pass) - have always a fixed volume level connected to that profile B ( ht-bypas mode) - use coaxial digital input for L + R as 24bit 192k or use the usb digi input as source b - have 2 active subs or 2 passive diy subs coneected into sub XLRs using the fixed volume level - have main L + R speakers connected via coax digi out using the fixed volume level - operate x4 sub dsp filtering / active cross over to subs and main L + R up to 270Hz - peq set up as where necessa for small fixes Someone having experiences of above use case with X4 ? This X4 set-up should be the 2ch stereo system connected and used as part of 7.2.2 HT - system . Link to comment
pre Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 Maybe to add, that are 4 separately located subs supported anyhow in connectivity to x4? This might help to make bigger sweet spot for bass. Link to comment
pre Posted March 3, 2019 Share Posted March 3, 2019 X4 supports digital HT bypass (switch off/on keeps the desired volume level - not exactly like the original wish but good enough), It also feeds the main speaker signal through the digital out and at the same time via the xlr analog main out. Support for multiple subs (0.4) is coming and remote configuration management also. And like always it takes some time. Link to comment
pre Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 March 19th 2019: an interview from X4 lead designer - with English subtitles: Honest revealing story why it took so long to have X4 ready and pass the quality requirements. And the quick review of the X4 skatbelt 1 Link to comment
pre Posted May 19, 2019 Share Posted May 19, 2019 Stereophile music round 97: X4 https://www.stereophile.com/content/music-round-97-hegel-c53-dspeaker-anti-mode-x4-page-2 The 0.4 version alpha firmware is available to adjust 4x subs . http://www.dspeaker.com/fileadmin/software/dspeaker/20190308Alpha.zip Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now