Popular Post gmgraves Posted March 26, 2017 Popular Post Share Posted March 26, 2017 I just received a Schiit Yggdrasil DAC. Simply incredible sound! Yes, $2300 is fairly expensive, but a comparably priced competitor is most assuredly a Delta-Sigma design while the YGGY is a single-bit ladder DAC. The only other High-end ladder DAC is from MSB (Diamond V) and is more than 10X the price and from what I hear from others whose opinions I value, sounds "comparable". This makes the YGGY an incredible bargain. This example is still stabilizing WRT operating temperature, and sounds better every day*. I was really surprised at the size and weight of the YGGY. I was expecting the thing to be the same size and weight as most other Schiit products, I.E., component half-width (9") by about 2" high. This thing weighs 25 pounds and is 16"wide by about 4" high and probably 12" deep. So far, I have but one "complaint". It needs a remote control to switch between digital sources, and to change absolute phase from one's listening position (right now, you have to get-up to accomplish either). A minor niggle would be that the legends above each light on the front panel are tiny and difficult (make that nigh impossible) to read. No matter, any DAC that sounds this good for this price is entitled to a few minor shortcomings! *This not the same as the notion of "burning-in" because if I turn the thing off for any reason, it would take another 5 or so days to get it back to the same point it was before cutting the power, The Computer Audiophile and Maxx134 2 George Link to comment
Speed Racer Posted March 26, 2017 Share Posted March 26, 2017 Multibit....not single-bit. Once you get your Yggdrasil burned-in, it only take about 48 hours to get it to a thermally stable state from cold. Link to comment
gmgraves Posted March 27, 2017 Author Share Posted March 27, 2017 3 hours ago, Speed Racer said: Multibit....not single-bit. Once you get your Yggdrasil burned-in, it only take about 48 hours to get it to a thermally stable state from cold. Yeah, my bad WRT the multi-bit/single bit business. Thanks for the correction. I don't know what I was thinking Electronics of that type don't "burn-in" as in improving performance. Burn-in is only to weed out units that fail due to "infant mortality", The DAC does need to thermally stabilize, however. Even Mike Moffat says that. sfseay 1 George Link to comment
Speed Racer Posted March 27, 2017 Share Posted March 27, 2017 1 minute ago, gmgraves said: Electronics of that type don't "burn-in" as in improving performance. Burn-in is only to weed out units that fail due to "infant mortality", The DAC does need to thermally stabilize, however. Even Mike Moffat says that. Well, there are plenty of people out there, including me from personal experience with my Yggdrasil, that would disagree with you! Link to comment
GUTB Posted March 27, 2017 Share Posted March 27, 2017 It's widely reported that the Yggdrasil requires 7 days of burn-in, and then it should be left on at all times to avoid it having to re-gain optimal thermal equilibrium. The Yggdrasil's AD5791BRUZ is low resolution but very accurate DAC chip. In conjunction with Schiit's closed-form filters and advanced clocking I could definitely see how it could be compelling. Link to comment
gmgraves Posted March 27, 2017 Author Share Posted March 27, 2017 37 minutes ago, Speed Racer said: Well, there are plenty of people out there, including me from personal experience with my Yggdrasil, that would disagree with you! Can you describe the mechanism, at the component level, for this "burn-in? What changes over the burn-in interval? I can understand thermal stabilization on a multi-bit Ladder (R2R) DAC. The values of the resistors in the ladder need to stabilize at their optimum resistance to minimize quantization error. Delta-Sigma DACs don't need this because they are single-bit over-sampled DACs. That's why most DAC units contain Delta-Sigma ICs. They are easier and cheaper to produce than are multi-bit R2R Dacs due to the precision required for the latter. Simplified block diagram of a Delta-Sigma DAC George Link to comment
mourip Posted March 27, 2017 Share Posted March 27, 2017 Congrats! I ended up buying two of these. One for my HP rig and the other for my speaker system. It has a wonderfully detailed and non-fatiguing sound. As others do I leave mine on all of the time. I do not want to debate "burn-in" but mine sounded increasingly better for over a month before settling in at just plain great. Let's just call it magic :-) LarryMagoo 1 "Don't Believe Everything You Think" System Link to comment
Samuel T Cogley Posted March 27, 2017 Share Posted March 27, 2017 I have a Yggy from the first production run. I'm kind of surprised about the low number I'm seeing WRT the "stabilization time". In my experience (and many others), the magic number is around 200 hours. I purchased an APC UPS just for the Yggy so it stays on 24/7/365. Link to comment
Jud Posted March 27, 2017 Share Posted March 27, 2017 16 hours ago, GUTB said: It's widely reported that the Yggdrasil requires 7 days of burn-in, and then it should be left on at all times to avoid it having to re-gain optimal thermal equilibrium. The Yggdrasil's AD5791BRUZ is low resolution but very accurate DAC chip. In conjunction with Schiit's closed-form filters and advanced clocking I could definitely see how it could be compelling. Advanced clocking depends; they don't do anything different with USB, and I haven't seen measurements for SPDIF. One never knows, do one? - Fats Waller The fairest thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion which stands at the cradle of true art and true science. - Einstein Computer, Audirvana -> optical Ethernet to Fitlet3 -> Fibbr Alpha Optical USB -> iFi NEO iDSD DAC -> Apollon Audio 1ET400A Mini (Purifi based) -> Vandersteen 3A Signature. Link to comment
TubeLover Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 Congrats on the Yggy. Wonderful DAC, and a "best buy" for the money. JC Link to comment
Speed Racer Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 On 3/26/2017 at 6:42 PM, GUTB said: The Yggdrasil's AD5791BRUZ is low resolution but very accurate DAC chip. I am pretty sure that the AD5791 is considered a high resolution DAC chip. Link to comment
crenca Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 10 hours ago, Speed Racer said: I am pretty sure that the AD5791 is considered a high resolution DAC chip. In what way (I assume you don't mean mathematically - perhaps you do) is this a debate about "resolution"? Do you mean the resolution of the analogue output (in that "sounds like" Hi-Fi review sort of way)? Hey MQA, if it is not all $voodoo$, show us the math! Link to comment
Speed Racer Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 http://www.analog.com/en/analog-dialogue/articles/20-bit-dac-and-accurate-precision-voltage-source.html Link to comment
Speed Racer Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 What DACs have higher resolution than 21 bits? All the math is done at 32 bits and rounded down to 21 bits just before it is sent to the DAC chip. hornytoad 1 Link to comment
GUTB Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 It's a 20-bit DAC in a 32-bit world. But more to the point, it doesn't support DSD or DXD. Native DSD is very very good and DXD sounds amazing. A Yggdrasil owner will never get to enjoy those. Also, high end DACs can resolve 24 bits of high definition audio...the Yggdrasil can't. Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 Good to read you got a Yggy George! It's a wonderful piece of equipment. Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
Speed Racer Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 How many DACs out there have 32 bits of resolution (ENOB)? I am not talking 32 bit math here.... hornytoad 1 Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 4 minutes ago, GUTB said: It's a 20-bit DAC in a 32-bit world. But more to the point, it doesn't support DSD or DXD. Native DSD is very very good and DXD sounds amazing. A Yggdrasil owner will never get to enjoy those. Also, high end DACs can resolve 24 bits of high definition audio...the Yggdrasil can't. The DAC designers I talk to all say they can get 20 bits and possibly 21 on a good day with the wind at their backs. Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
Popular Post The Computer Audiophile Posted March 29, 2017 Popular Post Share Posted March 29, 2017 1 minute ago, Speed Racer said: How many DACs out there have 32 bits of resolution (ENOB)? I am not talking 32 bit math here.... Zero. cpvniii and hornytoad 2 Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
Jud Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 33 minutes ago, Speed Racer said: What DACs have higher resolution than 21 bits? All the math is done at 32 bits and rounded down to 21 bits just before it is sent to the DAC chip. It's rounded to 24 bits if at all. 21 bits has to do with dynamic range above the noise floor, not internal math. 21 bits is starting to get down into the thermal noise of the equipment. cpvniii 1 One never knows, do one? - Fats Waller The fairest thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion which stands at the cradle of true art and true science. - Einstein Computer, Audirvana -> optical Ethernet to Fitlet3 -> Fibbr Alpha Optical USB -> iFi NEO iDSD DAC -> Apollon Audio 1ET400A Mini (Purifi based) -> Vandersteen 3A Signature. Link to comment
GUTB Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 39 minutes ago, The Computer Audiophile said: The DAC designers I talk to all say they can get 20 bits and possibly 21 on a good day with the wind at their backs. The MSB V Diamond can do 26-bit for example. Link to comment
Jud Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 Just now, GUTB said: The MSB V Diamond can do 26-bit for example. They must have a hurricane at their backs, have a very abnormally high top output, or liquid nitrogen cooling. Otherwise normal thermal noise would tend to swamp the lower bits of that claimed dynamic range. One never knows, do one? - Fats Waller The fairest thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion which stands at the cradle of true art and true science. - Einstein Computer, Audirvana -> optical Ethernet to Fitlet3 -> Fibbr Alpha Optical USB -> iFi NEO iDSD DAC -> Apollon Audio 1ET400A Mini (Purifi based) -> Vandersteen 3A Signature. Link to comment
Popular Post GUTB Posted March 29, 2017 Popular Post Share Posted March 29, 2017 Sorry, I meant resolution in terms of processing resolution. The AD5791 does 20 bits, and other high-end ladder DACs can do 24-bits and above. Some of you guys may not know, but recently Schiit got into an internet battle with John Atkinson (senior editor at Stereophile) who tweeted that the Yggdrasil was obsolete. Jason Stoddard blew a gasket and demanded that Atkinson amend the tweet, who stood by his statement. So Stoddard called up their Stereophile ad manager to make a last minute change to a certain ad placement: manisandher, crenca and One and a half 3 Link to comment
gmgraves Posted March 29, 2017 Author Share Posted March 29, 2017 13 hours ago, TubeLover said: Congrats on the Yggy. Wonderful DAC, and a "best buy" for the money. JC Since it and a $35,000 MSB Diamond V DAC sound pretty much identical, I'd say that it was more than just a "good buy" (I borrowed one over last weekend). bigbob 1 George Link to comment
GUTB Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 13 minutes ago, gmgraves said: Since it and a $35,000 MSB Diamond V DAC sound pretty much identical, I'd say that it was more than just a "good buy" (I borrowed one over last weekend). Considering the 7K MSB Analog is clearly superior to the Yggdrasil, it's surprising to hear that the Diamond V performs so poorly. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now