Jump to content
IGNORED

Self-powered speaker vs. vibration isolation


Recommended Posts

The title says it all.

Many 'philes - myself included - go to great lengths to eliminate vibrations in our systems as much as possible. It seems to me putting the amp itself inside the speaker - itself king of vibration sources - defies all logic, yet some self-powered speakers are highly regarded for sq. How do they "get away" with it?

Link to comment

Lots of different ways. They can build separate boxes inside the speakers with isolation, they can use opposing cones so that the vibrations cancel each other out , etc.

Main listening (small home office):

Main setup: Surge protector +>Isol-8 Mini sub Axis Power Strip/Isolation>QuietPC Low Noise Server>Roon (Audiolense DRC)>Stack Audio Link II>Kii Control>Kii Three (on their own electric circuit) >GIK Room Treatments.

Secondary Path: Server with Audiolense RC>RPi4 or analog>Cayin iDAC6 MKII (tube mode) (XLR)>Kii Three .

Bedroom: SBTouch to Cambridge Soundworks Desktop Setup.
Living Room/Kitchen: Ropieee (RPi3b+ with touchscreen) + Schiit Modi3E to a pair of Morel Hogtalare. 

All absolute statements about audio are false :)

Link to comment
21 minutes ago, firedog said:

Lots of different ways. They can build separate boxes inside the speakers with isolation, they can use opposing cones so that the vibrations cancel each other out , etc.

 

I wonder how/if the big magnets in the bass drivers affected the electronics in the amps.  Guess they have to do something to EM-isolate.

One never knows, do one? - Fats Waller

The fairest thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion which stands at the cradle of true art and true science. - Einstein

Computer, Audirvana -> optical Ethernet to Fitlet3 -> Fibbr Alpha Optical USB -> iFi NEO iDSD DAC -> Apollon Audio 1ET400A Mini (Purifi based) -> Vandersteen 3A Signature.

Link to comment

If there is some negative to that vibration it is more than made up for by the positives of actively powered speakers.

 

The little JBL LSR305s I have above 300 hz mostly measure below .3 % distortion using REW playing at 95 db.  The reason they test higher below 300 hz is mostly due to pollution of the measurement by low frequency noise which is difficult to block out.   Plenty of non-powered speakers measure more distortion than that.

 

Could the LSR305s be better if done differently?  I doubt it.  They have a single chip that has an ADC, does a digital xover (and I think some minor DSP for FR of the drivers) then DAC to feed two class D amplifiers which are also part of the same chip. It sits right inside next to the woofer.  I have read of at least two DIY posts where people damped the inside and in one case damped that board holding the chip.  Making pretty much no difference. Maybe like wgb113 says it is one of those things of marginal value that is over-obsessed about by audiophiles.

And always keep in mind: Cognitive biases, like seeing optical illusions are a sign of a normally functioning brain. We all have them, it’s nothing to be ashamed about, but it is something that affects our objective evaluation of reality. 

Link to comment
  • 3 weeks later...
On 24/03/2017 at 6:09 PM, firedog said:

Lots of different ways. They can build separate boxes inside the speakers with isolation, they can use opposing cones so that the vibrations cancel each other out , etc.

 

Would this solve problems due to sound-induced vibration? 

"Science draws the wave, poetry fills it with water" Teixeira de Pascoaes

 

HQPlayer Desktop / Mac mini → Intona 7054 → RME ADI-2 DAC FS (DSD256)

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...