Optical drive

[audiventory]

Read my F.A.Q. about CD ripping (all questions that I remember when write article) http://samplerateconverter.com/cd-ripper/rip-audio-cd-faq

 

If I forgot something, write here, please.

[Monge]

@alfe Great information. Thank you very much for sharing. Subscribed.

[jin]

There is no offset drive for rom, dvd or blu-ray?

[jin]

Edit:  drive offset

[jin]

On 10/10/2017 at 7:12 PM, audiventory said:

Read my F.A.Q. about CD ripping (all questions that I remember when write article) http://samplerateconverter.com/cd-ripper/rip-audio-cd-faq

 

If I forgot something, write here, please.

 

You think that the database is reliable? different CRC mode, different wav containers but still same result? 

 

[audiventory]

22 minutes ago, jin said:

 

You think that the database is reliable? different CRC mode, different wav containers but still same result? 

 

 

1. Database correct error detection probability is unknown.

CD rippers' correct error detection probability is unknown too.

I recommend use one of these methods, that you like more. But you don't know what is better by error detection.

 

Calculations see here http://samplerateconverter.com/educational/best-cd-ripping-software

 

 

 

2. What you mean as different WAV containers?

 

 

3. What you mean as CRC mode?

[jin]

2 hours ago, audiventory said:

 

 

 

 

 

2. What you mean as different WAV containers?

 

 

3. What you mean as CRC mode?

 

AIFF, WAV, FLAC...or only audio data is concerned?

 

All CRC 32 are the same? 

[audiventory]

12 minutes ago, jin said:

AIFF, WAV, FLAC...or only audio data is concerned?

 

AIFF, WAV and FLAC may be used PCM containers, not WAV. I re-asked for univocal understanding.

 

13 minutes ago, jin said:

All CRC 32 are the same?

 

That implementations of CRC you mean as all? Do you meant that checksum is calculated for the ripping-checksum database different ways by different rippers?

[jin]

18 hours ago, audiventory said:

 

AIFF, WAV and FLAC may be used PCM containers, not WAV. I re-asked for univocal understanding.

 

 

That implementations of CRC you mean as all? Do you meant that checksum is calculated for the ripping-checksum database different ways by different rippers?

 

Questioning my questions may be the OP can help?

[audiventory]

8 minutes ago, jin said:

Questioning my questions may be the OP can help?

 

I'm not sure that understand your posts correctly. Need details for exact understanding of the term meanings.

[Ralf11]

identical checksums may sound different, but would that depend on which particular bits differ while yielding the same checksum?

[kumakuma]

13 minutes ago, Ralf11 said:

identical checksums may sound different, but would that depend on which particular bits differ while yielding the same checksum?

 

 

[jin]

http://resist.isti.cnr.it/free_slides/cryptology/waldvogel/Chechsums_Wildi.pdf

[tboooe]

Curious if there is a consensus on the best drives are ripping?  I see mention if a Plextor Premium drive?

[Ralf11]

heh!  @johnseye is trying to determine if it matters on a different thread; I posted on it a NLA very expensive drive

 

I hope UCLA enjoys the new Chip they got...