Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile

    EMM Labs DA2 Reference DAC and PRE Stereo Preamplifier Review

     


     

     

     

    The EMM Labs DA2 is a hard DAC to pin down. In a good way. Many DACs present a readily apparent color or signature that's identifiable from a mile away. I've often listened to other DACs and said to myself, there's the touch of bass bloat or the upsampling signature I remember. When listening to the EMM Labs DA2 I haven't been able to home in on anything specific that stands out across all or a majority of recordings. At times I think I hear a character trait through the DA2, but quickly referencing the sound against other top level DACs gives me more clarity and assurance that my initial perceptions can be slightly off. 


    Let me explain this a bit further. When listening to the EMM Labs DA2 reference DAC I'd think to myself that the sound was a bit more laid back than what I'm used to hearing. Then I'd switch inputs on the EMM Labs PRE to listen through another DAC, and I'd hear music that sounded even more laid back. The opposite was also true with music that sounded a bit more in my face or up front. When one has the ability to compare and contrast top tier DACs, it's much easier put sonic characteristics into perspective. What initially sounds bright, may be somewhat mild compared to the reproduction through another converter. Granted these differences are likely the stuff only music lovers and audiophiles would notice, but little nuances are incredibly important to many of us. It's the fine details that often matter most when it comes to the highest levels of performance. 

     

    The system I used for part this review was unlike anything I've setup in recent memory. Sure I compare DACs and preamps and digital to digital converters but not like this. Using the EMM Labs PRE preamplifier as the center of the system, I connected the EMM Labs DA2, dCS Rossini, and Berkeley Audio Design RS2 MQA DACs to balanced inputs 1, 2 and 3 respectively. I also labeled each input via the PRE's front panel configuration menu to make certain I didn't mistakenly attribute the sound of one DAC to another. Sources for these DACs included the Sonore Signature Rendu SE, dCS Network Bridge, Aurender W20, and the Rossini's own Ethernet input. When comparing the sound of the DACs with minimal time between audio samples, I setup a Roon zone group that enabled me to send the same music to all three units simultaneously. I rotated digital interfaces between the DACs when possible and I configured the Aurender W20 to send dual AES audio to the dCS Rossini and to receive external word clock from the Rossini that was set in master clock mode.

     

     

    The DA2 and PRE in a nutshell

     

    Ed Meitner has masterfully designed analog and digital audio products for for both the professional and high end consumer markets for decades. The DA2 DAC and PRE preamplifier represent Ed / EMM's highest digital and preampfification achievements to date. 

     

    The DA2 has little in common with the EMM Labs DAC2X I reviewed and C.A.S.H Listed several years ago. At the time the DAC2X was one of the best DACs I'd yet heard in my system. The DA2 is in another league and should be given "franchise product" status. It's a component to build one's system around just as Lebron James is a player to build a team around. Perhaps more apropos would be to call the DA2 to the Maurice Richard of EMM components. (I'd love to mention Al MacInnis or Lanny McDonald given EMM Labs is based in Calgary, but that's a story for another day).

     

    The first thing I noticed about the DA2 upon unboxing it was the machined aluminum chassis. This DAC is not only 10 pounds heavier than the DAC2X, it looks and feels like a product in a completely different category. Inside the DA2 features an exclusive aerospace grade ceramic circuit board, new analog stages, the MCLK2 proprietary custom clock, and the world's first 16xDSD proprietary discrete dual differential D-to-A converters (MDAC2™). 

     

    Those unlearned in Digital Signal Processing (DSP) may think EMM's MDAT2™ 16xDSD digital audio translator signal processing is one of those HiFi hocus pocus futures that "must be better" because it's double the DAC2X's 8xDSD technology. To that I say, give it a listen, look at the math, and consider the fact that thousands of audiophiles the world over have been using external applications to DSP their music from 1x, 2x, 4x PCM to DSD64, DSD128, and DSD512. EMM's MDAT2™ removes the need for any configuration or external application and processes the audio at DSD1024. 

     

    Note: This has zero to do with the native resolution of the recording. In fact, obtaining a recording at DSD1024 doesn't make any sense. It's all about processing the signal and filtering inside the DAC. 


    The EMM Labs PRE is the best preamplifier Ed Meitner has ever created. It's only fitting that the PRE pairs perfectly with the DA2 fit & finish and overall quality of music reproduction. Not only that, but the DA2 requires a preamp for volume control, making this pair a terrific match. The PRE features everything one wold expect from a reference level product including fully discrete dual-balanced signal paths, class A circuitry, and precision software-based analog volume control. Volume control is critically important whether its in a DAC or preamplifier. There's no such thing as a perfect volume control, but EMM has managed to deliver something stellar with the PRE.

     

    During this review I used the balanced XLR inputs and output of the PRE exclusively. This preamp doesn't have a ton of bells and whistles, but its focus is clearly on reference level two channel performance. 

     

     

    EMM Labs DA2 DAC EMM Labs PRE Preamplifier

    EMM Labs DA2 DAC Rear EMM Labs PRE Preamplifier Rear

     

     

     

     

     

    The Listening


    Oh the tone of Gary Karr's double bass! 

     

    The EMM Labs DA2 / PRE combination really shined when reproducing Gary Karr's Bass Virtuoso album (HDAD 24 bit / 192 kHz). The tone of Gary's double bass sounded incredible. When I talk about tone I'm talking about the overall sound of the instrument not the fine details. This double bass had magic to it, like it was jumping out through my speakers. Not in a forward presentation type of way, but in a realistic musical way. As if it was three dimensional. The instrument had unmistakeable tonal color that was allowed to come through because of a lack of color imposed by the DA2 DAC. 

     

    With respect to fine details, the DA2 reproduced everything that was available on this recording from the lat 1950s and early 1960s. Tape artifacts can be heard throughout the album, but it's of little consequence other than to signify that everything is being reproduced. Listening to nearly every track on the album one can hear everything that goes into playing the double bass. From Gary's fingers controlling the strings on top to the tiny screeches of the bow, it's all laid bare for the ears and brain to process. 

     

    Listening to Dixie Chicks' Let Him Fly, a 16/44.1 recording with a huge dynamic range score of 19, I was very impressed with the DA2. The DAC's level of detail and presence in the soundstage was fantastic. The DA2 didn't seem to make errors of commission or omission, and fell directly in the middle of the Berkeley and dCS. For example, listening through the Berkeley Natalie Maines' voice on this track was about a foot further back than where it was presented through the DA2. The Rossini was about six inches forward of the DA2 in reproducing the vocals and instruments. There's no way for me to know which one is more accurate on this recording, it's all a matter of taste. Other details throughout this track were presented with more weight through the dCS Rossini and much less weight through the Alpha DAC RS2 MQA. I hate to call the DA2 middle of the road because that implies ordinary or fair-to-middling, when in fact this DAC is extraordinary. 

     

    You're buying those speakers to listening to Pink Floyd? Hell yeah I am. That's a paraphrase of a conversation I had with a HiFi dealer when I purchased my first pair of Martin Logan ReQuest loudspeakers back in the late 1990s. It's 2018 and I'm still listening to Pink Floyd, but on much better speakers through a much better system of components. I pulled out the 24/96 version of Pink Floyd's 1975 original stereo mix of Wish You Were Here for this review. This is likely my favorite Pink Floyd album. Through the album the same differences with respect to weight, soundstage, and detail could be heard between the three DACs connected to the EMM Labs PRE. The DA2 presented the title track with wonderful detail and terrific oomph in the bottom end. 

     

    Backing up one track to Have a Cigar, I thoroughly enjoyed the DA2's reproduction of Nick Mason's drum performance. This is something I previously hadn't noticed as I was enamored by the keyboard and guitars that are more in one's face. Mason's drums on Cigar take a back seat in presence but are sonically superb through the DA2. Through a lesser DAC Mason's drum kit could easily be jumbled into a larger sound without nuance and delineation between kick, snare, and cymbals. 


    My favorite Shelby Lynne album is Tears, Lies and Alibis, released in 2010. The EMM Labs DA2 lets Shelby's home recording come through with all its imperfections. This is what's great about both he recording and the DAC. I want to hear the imperfections and colors, they are what makes music real to me. This album was recorded to a Studer 24 track tape machine at 30 ips in Shelby's house. She sang into a Telefunken 251 and mic'd her guitar with a Neumann KM81. This is so far from a crisp, possibly sterile, digital recording and the reproduced sound through the DA2 / PRE combination was also so far from crisp and sterile. 

     

    Track number 3, Like a Fool is a wonderful sounding gem featuring Shelby's vocals up front with sparkles of instruments in the background. Mixed by Al Schmitt at Capitol Studios, this track just sucks the listener into the story, so long as the reproduction equipment doesn't stand in the way. Through the DA2 I heard Shelby's voice in all its lush glory, no doubt enhanced by the Telefunken tube microphone. Sure the sound isn't as good as when I sat a few feet from her performing this track at a small club in Minneapolis, but that was a once in an lifetime experience. The experience of playing, and replaying, this track and entire album when I want as loud as I want through the EMM Labs DA2 was 100% sublime. 

     

     

    my-system.jpg

     


    Conclusion


    Ed Meitner and Emm Labs are legendary in both professional and consumer high end audio. One doesn't become legendary without providing legendary products and experiences to customers for decades. That's what EMM Labs has done and continues to do with its flagship DA2 and PRE. The world's first 16xDSD signal processing along with a handful of other propriety features and legendary sound quality put the DA2 DAC on the top of the EMM Labs mountain and in a class with only a couple components in all of HiFi. Sonically the DA2 has a transparency and a soundstage that delivers on the promise of high end audio. Reproducing music with all its warts when warts are present and in all its glory for those rare recordings that really shine. The DA2 and PRE are in rarefied air no doubt at $25,000 a piece, but the best of anything is never inexpensive. 

     

     

    Note: The DA2 is the second DAC from Ed Meitner and the team at EMM Labs to make the C.A.S.H. List, and the PRE is the first preamplifier on the list. 

     


     


    Product Informtion:

     

     

    Superphonica Note:

     

    To learn a bit more about EMM Labs, purchase certified pre-owned components directly from the company, or sell your existing components to upgrade to the DA2 or PRE, visit the EMM Labs brand boutique on Superphonica1.

     

     

    bb.png


     

     

    Associated Music:

     

     

     

     

    Associated Equipment:

     

     

    1 Neither Superphonica nor Computer Audiophile receive a commission on the sale of goods through the EMM Labs brand boutique.




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    20 minutes ago, firedog said:

    Doesn’t the new iFi DSD pro DAC also upsample to 1024 DSD?

    Good question @firedog. Here is what iFi says, but the language is a bit unusual:

     

    "For the first time, Pro iDSD brings Studio Grade DSD1024 remastering to the mass. Now one can remaster all his/her music to a superlative DSD1024 format just like in a recording studio and enjoy the ultra-high resolution it provides.

     

    For the DSD1024, if the MultiBit DAC is one half of the ‘heart’ of the Pro iDSD’s digital engine, then the other half is surely the Crysopeia FPGA. This is where we believe FPGA excels, by handling the remastering duties to attain the DSD1024 audio format. In fact the Pro iDSD can handle all audio formats to to DSD1024 or DSD512 or PCM 768kHz with user-selectable digital filters."

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    14 minutes ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

    Good question @firedog. Here is what iFi says, but the language is a bit unusual:

     

    "For the first time, Pro iDSD brings Studio Grade DSD1024 remastering to the mass. Now one can remaster all his/her music to a superlative DSD1024 format just like in a recording studio and enjoy the ultra-high resolution it provides.

     

    For the DSD1024, if the MultiBit DAC is one half of the ‘heart’ of the Pro iDSD’s digital engine, then the other half is surely the Crysopeia FPGA. This is where we believe FPGA excels, by handling the remastering duties to attain the DSD1024 audio format. In fact the Pro iDSD can handle all audio formats to to DSD1024 or DSD512 or PCM 768kHz with user-selectable digital filters."

    To me, that's a lot of marketing speak saying you can set it to upsample to 1024. If someone else knows the answer, chime in.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Chris,

     

    Great write-up. One of your best if not the best so far. Thank you so much! However, I got a question for you: when you said that the DA2 sit in the middle, are you implying that the Rossini dac has more weight and detail (in a good sense) than the DA2?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Chris,

     

    I take it that your Pink Floyd "Wish You Were Here" 24/96 is the Blu-ray Disc from the Immersion Box Set?

    If so, I missed out on this set a few years ago. Can you please recommend another good version of WYWH in 2.0 stereo?

     

    Thanks...

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    5 hours ago, audiophile65 said:

    Hi Chris,

     

    I take it that your Pink Floyd "Wish You Were Here" 24/96 is the Blu-ray Disc from the Immersion Box Set?

    If so, I missed out on this set a few years ago. Can you please recommend another good version of WYWH in 2.0 stereo?

     

    Thanks...

    Let me check my copies and I’ll let you know. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Quote

    1 Neither Superphonica nor Computer Audiophile receive a commission on the sale of goods through the dCS brand boutique.

     

    OK. But ...

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    CASH means it needs a lot of cash? 😞

     

    EMM sounds good, but.. there are millions of options today. 

     

     

     

     

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    12 hours ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

    Too funny. I didn’t want to hang my head reading negative comments over the 4th of July 😁

     

    Sorry to perhaps disagree with the majority, but I liked the last video review .  I said in the comments from the last one that maybe that vid. didn't take the maximum advantage of the format, but I still think it's an evolving thing and I put my vote (whatever little that's worth) towards more videos in the future.  

     

    HAVE A HAPPY 4TH EVERYONE!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    16 hours ago, PeterSt said:

     

    OK. But ...

    Ha! Good catch. As someone who has written code you know that borrowing from something you’ve already written is smart. Except when one forgets to change the variable :~)

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    6 hours ago, michael123 said:

    CASH means it needs a lot of cash? 😞

     

    EMM sounds good, but.. there are millions of options today. 

    Like Rossini...

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I take no issue with reviews of audio components in this price range. I’ll never own such components but that’s not a reason for the reviews not to exist(or against me taking an interest in reading them). To be realistic, however, we’re looking at spending another 75 to 100 thousand dollars for amp(s), speakers and source to go with this pair of components priced at $25,000(btw, not $25,00)apiece. I would definitely enjoy spend a day listening to such a system in an optimized room(with, again, more money spent on room treatment).

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    18 hours ago, esimms86 said:

    I take no issue with reviews of audio components in this price range. I’ll never own such components but that’s not a reason for the reviews not to exist(or against me taking an interest in reading them). To be realistic, however, we’re looking at spending another 75 to 100 thousand dollars for amp(s), speakers and source to go with this pair of components priced at $25,000(btw, not $25,00)apiece. I would definitely enjoy spend a day listening to such a system in an optimized room(with, again, more money spent on room treatment).

    I do know about that. This is really the kind of component pairing you could build a system around over time. I'm sure they really scale as you upgrade your gear and everyone knows that the source comes first!

     

    I'm kidding, of course. 

     

    I'm with you, the total system investment here would be crazy. I talked to a guy last year that had ~$250k USD in equipment going into $12k speakers, though... I had to ask him about that choice of "balance"...

     

    Anyway, this is nice to read and maybe a couple years down the road we'll be able to pick up one of those DA2s for cheap?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Any thoughts on this EMM vs. a Chord DAVE? (Please, anyone who has heard both EMM and DAVE sonics, you're impressions would be welcome.) I've been a fan of EMM since their first cd players.

     

    I have a DAVE for my desktop system and an EMM XDS1v2 for my old-school CD-based system. Somehow, I still like the EMM player better. There is more non-fatiguing sweetness and silkiness and more transparent bass and a sense of a more natural sound with more definition of texture. And the bass is more detailed.

     

    I never heard the Blu2 with the DAVE.

    I use (mainly now) Focal Utopia headphones for listening and do some speaker listening too.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    2 hours ago, bellhead said:

    I have a DAVE for my desktop system and an EMM XDS1v2 for my old-school CD-based system. Somehow, I still like the EMM player better. There is more non-fatiguing sweetness and silkiness and more transparent bass and a sense of a more natural sound with more definition of texture. And the bass is more detailed.

    I used to own a XDS1v2. Although I enjoyed the sound, in hindsight I find it a little on the analytical side. And I don't have a bright system by any measure (single ended tubes into horn speakers).

     

    I moved to a dCS Rossini + Master Clock and the sound acquired a lovely body and tone that was missing from the EMM Labs. 

     

    I also had customer support issues with EMM so will never consider an EMM Labs component again.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Thank you. Would you have any quick impressions of the Rossini with DSD-encoded files? (I have .dsf files.)

    Thank you.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    58 minutes ago, bellhead said:

    Thank you. Would you have any quick impressions of the Rossini with DSD-encoded files? (I have .dsf files.)

    Thank you.

    Fabulous. Two examples I know very well: Nina Simone’s “Mood Indigo” from the recent SACD remaster from Analogue Productions, and Brubeck’s Time Out SACD (both ripped to DSF via a PS3). Very nice on the XDS1v2. Stunning depth, tone, color, presence on the Rossini. Not close.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    10 hours ago, bellhead said:

    I have a DAVE for my desktop system and an EMM XDS1v2 for my old-school CD-based system. Somehow, I still like the EMM player better.

    Play Rehab from Amy Winehouse's Back To Black from the 24/96 HDTracks download on the XDS1v2. You will find dropouts. One of many examples. Does not happen with ANY other DAC I have tried. Do you really want to buy EMM Labs?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have always heard great sound out of EMM labs gear, so i would expect no difference with these components.  Thanks for sharing your impressions Chris.  But I do take issue with this statement:

     

    "...The world's first 16xDSD signal processing..."  This is rather mis-leading.

     

    For example, the Mola Mola Makua preamp/DAC and Tambaqui DAC both oversample to 100 MHz and 1 bit before conversion happens via a dual mono discrete DSD DAC section, 16xDSD is 45.1584 MHz, so Mola Mola is converting at twice the rate of EMM Labs in their DACs.  While this is indeed nit picking, I feel it is important to acknowledge that there are other components out there doing DSD conversion at similar, or even higher, rates.

     

    In any case, I would expect superb sound from the EMM Labs pair.  Do you have any more details on the volume control in the preamp?  Is it a discrete resistor ladder type controlled via software, or perhaps an on chip resistor ladder type (not necessarily a bad thing, BTW, there is one chip in particular that does VC very, very well), just curious, as with the DSD converters often we need to sue an analog VC.

     

    Oh BTW, I LOVE the DSD version of "Wish You Were Here" from Analog Productions, just fantastic here as long as you turn it UP!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×