Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile
    The Computer Audiophile

    Apple HomePod Review - An Audiophile Perspective

    I had zero plans to purchase an Apple HomePod until I saw the initial reviews. 

     

     

    "...sound quality that rivals speakers nearly twice the price..." 

    - Gizmodo

     

    "...The star of the show, in my opinion, is a downward facing woofer..."

    - Gizmodo

     

    "4" high-excursion, upward-firing woofer"

    iFixit

     

     

    "...audiophiles test HomePod, say it sounds better than $1,000 speaker"

    Arstechnica

     

     

    "Amazing sound quality"

    Tech Radar

     

     


    I have no complaints with other writers' opinions, but after reading so much glowing press I just had to get one myself. Not that I was interested in listening through a HomePod, but I wanted to make up my own mind with actually hands on experience. In this review I focus on sound quality above all else. The HomePod offers Siri integration, but I'm very underwhelmed by it thus far. Plus, with a MacBook Pro, iMac, iPad Pro, and iPhone all sitting on my desk, Siri can get more than a little annoying. Hey Siri play The Beatles I said, my phone started playing The Beatles. Not bad if I was talking to my iPhone. Hey Siri I said one more time. My HomePod answered this time. Play The Beatles. Then I had two different Beatles tracks playing simultaneously. Anyway, I'm not a fan. Plus, Siri can only play lossy music right now. 

     

    The HomePod supports Apple's ecosystem. If you want anything else, sure you can make it work but I don't recommend it. I used AirPlay via Roon exclusively during this review because I needed to play lossless music. I hate AirPlay and its 2010 technology that requires all audio be streamed through a mobile device or computer. Hey Siri, talk directly to the cloud so I don't use all my iPhone's battery. 


    For this review I used my main HiFi system to give me a reference. Without a reference there's no way to gage anything. 

     

    Speakers: TAD Compact reference One CR1 $45,000 (frequency response 40Hz–20kHz, ±3dB)
    Amplifiers: Constellation Audio Inspiration Monoblocks $20,000 /pr
    DAC: dCS Rossini $24,000
    Cabling by Wire World and 512 Engineering ~$10,000


    Apple: HomePod $349 (frequency response 40Hz–20kHz, ±3dB)

     

    Klipsch: The Three $499 (frequency response 45Hz–20kHz, ±3dB)


    Executive Summary: Don't fool yourself into thinking this is an audiophile product. It's a me too voice control product that happens to play audio. 

     

     

    Details


    I put the HomePod through an extensive listening test of my favorite music and typical audiophile music. In the rare instance, both of these categories (favorite and audiophile) contain the same music, but that's like a total solar eclipse, it doesn't happen frequently. 

    Let's start with a song that leans much more toward the audiophile end of the continuum, but is a very nice song nonetheless. Randi Tytingvag's Red or Dead from her album Red is a track I use frequently when reviewing HiFi gear. Through my reference HiFi system Randi's vocal sounds very crisp and piercing at times. Jens Fossum's double bass lays a great foundation throughout the track. This bass sounds like it has the correct number of strings, four, because it indeed has four strings. Other very distinct instruments such as the rebab and Glockenspiel can be heard filling in throughout the track. All of the instruments including Randi's voice are a bit sterile because they seem to exist on their own, rather than as instruments played by a group of musicians in a room. I'd be very surprised if this album was recorded with all the musicians sitting in a room. That's neither here nor there for this review. The sterility of the track can help one evaluate some aspects of HiFi equipment because it's very easy to listen for a single instrument and compare it to one's reference. 

     

    The HomePod shouldn't come close to my reference system, and it doesn't. Let's not kid ourselves. Apple has more money than some countries and has hired very smart engineers, but it can't change the laws of physics. Starting with the impressive aspects of the HomePod playing Red or Dead, Randi's vocal is crisp and clear, but has a very slight soft edge. The very fine details for which audiophiles frequently listen aren't nearly as audible through the HomePod as they are through a true HiFi system. The HomePod has a very nice sound that will likely please most listeners without causing fatigue on tracks like Red or Dead. If I was unaware of the true sound of this track, I'd think the HomePod had done a pretty good job reproducing the vocal portion. 

     

    Moving on to the foundation of the track, the double bass. I've yet to see a HomePod measurement that corresponds with what I hear through this speaker, with respect to bass. The HomePod is a bass monster, for better or worse. On Red or Dead the double bass sounds like it has a single string and is being played in a small closet. Thumps and booms are pretty much what the HomePod is all about and it's very clear after a single listen to a track with very controlled bass. Jens Fossum is an accomplished Norwegian jazz bassist, who would likely cringe at hearing his playing sound like it does through the HomePod. If I was talking about electronic bass from a perennial favorite of mine, N.W.A.'s Straight Outta Compton, I may like the boom, but when listening to an acoustic bass crafted by a luthier with the finest of woods, I just can't take the over-exaggerated bottom end sound of the HomePod.


    An ear worm that I can't stop listening to is Dua Lipa's song New Rules. This song is fabulous through the HomePod. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if the HomePod was voiced with pop music. In other words, the HomePod was built for music like this. Dua's vocal just sizzles with heavy top end EQ. Equally jacked up is the bottom end. The bass on this track is deep with a great beat. What about the midrange? What midrange. This track sizzles and booms, and is a match made in heaven for the HomePod. Again, I love this track and I love the way it sounds on the HomePod. But, it's not a track made to reproduce an acoustic instrument in any type of accurate way. It's a track made to move the listener. Through the HomePod the track almost got me dancing. No wait, that's a lie. I did tap out the beat on my MacBook Pro however.


    Switching to Eddie Vedder's track Society from the Into The Wild soundtrack, I heard what could be the worst sound from the HomePod that I've yet experienced. I can handle exaggerated bass and highs that are a bit soft, but this track had a haze over the entire thing. Even worse, it sounded like Eddie's vocal was emanating from a box in front of me (or should I say Pod in front of me).  I've heard this track sound fabulous on many HiFi system over the years. In fact, I remember listening to it with an engineer who worked on Pearl Jam's tours through a Focal / Micromega system. He loved the sound as much as I did and though it was incredibly accurate. Sure that system was thousands of dollars more than the HomePod, but people are calling this Pod an audiophile product and saying it may get more listeners into HiFi once again. With this in mind, I have to at least set a bar for what high end sound is like. And, the HomePod was nowhere near any of the HiFi system on which I've heard this song. Closed-in with a jumbled mess of sounds and a haze over the top is how I'd describe this track through the HomePod. 


    How about a little Metallica? I love Metallica's ...And Justice for All album for both the music and the way it sounds. It's not a favorite of many Metallica fans, but I just love the sounds of Lars' Tama drum set. The track One features a nice soft-fish guitar intro. On the HomePod this guitar sounds really good and has good tone. I can see many music lovers really enjoying sounds like this. In fact, I wish the entire track sounded as good as this opening sounded through the Pod. I'm frustrated to say, the HomePod just falls apart at the 0:55 mark in the song. The drum sound that I love, that I've played for so many people on so many different systems including one a couple weeks ago in New York City, was totally wrong. It sounded like a huge band of upper bass frequencies was missing. I heard Lars' kick drum, but not all of it. It's as if there was a filter on the upper end of the drum set and an exaggeration on the very bottom end. A really large exaggeration. Heck, it sounded like the Boston Acoustics / Alpine system in my car, with a trunk full of subwoofers, amplifiers, and extra capacitors. I like bass as much as anyone, but the sound of the HomePod is too strange for me. It seems to be reproducing the very bottom end without the midrange frequencies that are required to make the bottom end sound anything close to real. Perhaps, realism isn't what Apple was shooting for with the HomePod. I don't judge. Apple's customers may prefer the sound of this speaker. I wouldn't be surprised if Apple's focus groups preferred this sound over a flat frequency response. 

     

    Let's talk about frequency response for a second. So far the HomePod has been measured and shown to have a pretty flat frequency response. Given that this speaker has adaptive Digital Signal Processing (DSP) based on the music being played and based on its location in the room, I'm not sure if those measurements are really indicative of real world performance. In fact, there's really no way to measure the HomePod if its DSP changes based on the music, volume, and room acoustics. The volume and room can certainly be controlled, but the music not so much. I'm more than willing to admit error here as speaker measurements are out of my wheelhouse, but something just isn't adding up. Flat measurements with completely un-flat sound. 

     

    Speculation alert: Having just watched the Netflix series named Dirty Money. I can't help but think of the episode that documented Volkswagen's cheating with respect to measuring of its Diesel engines. VW created software that sensed when the car was placed on a dyno and adapted the car's performance to pass the emissions tests as long as the steering wheel wasn't moved (a sign the car wasn't on the road). Call me crazy, but it seems like Apple has designed the HomePod to appeal to many listeners who like exaggerated bass when playing music and also designed it to recognize the input signal of a traditional speaker measuring test, then adjust its output accordingly. That way, Apple has the best of both worlds. A wonderful linear measuring speaker that also sounds wonderful for those who don't like linearity. 

     

    I switched back to music to write a little bit more about the HomePod sound for this review, but really don't have anything new to report. I put on Natalie Merchant's Tigerlily album, playing the track San Andreas Fault. Good vocals, to a certain extent, but also a little veiled with haze and boxiness. Then the boom. It's like a broken record with the HomePod. Sure, I'm likely being a bit tough on this speaker, but I'm human and it's hard to ignore all the hysteria calling this thing the second coming of the audiophile and the last speaker anyone will ever own. 

     

    Maybe a little value can be gleaned from discussing how the HomePod compares to a similar speaker, The Three from Klipsch ($499 45Hz ~20kHz @ -3dB). Setting aside the functionality of the speakers (Klipsch has far better functionality for those who want to listen to music, HomePod has Siri), and focussing on sound quality, I prefer The Three from Klipsch. It has a much more balanced sound than the HomePod. Eddie Vedder's Society was very enjoyable through The Three as opposed to the HomePod. I A/B'd them for twenty minutes to make sure I heard what I thought I heard. I honestly expected the HomePod to put the Klipsch unit to shame, but that wasn't the case. In my comparisons The Three from Klipsch was the 1980 US olympic hockey team that beat the Russian HomePod in the miracle on ice. OK, that's a bit far fetched, but given it's olympic time in South Korea, that was on my mind. Listening to several other tracks, I couldn't help but think the HomePod was better suited to be The Three's subwoofer if such a configuration existed. 

     

    After listening to the HomePod and comparing it to a reference system and a similar speaker, I realized the HomePod isn't about sound quality. It's about Apple trying to catch up to the voice control market dominated by Amazon. Because Apple needs to catch up and it doesn't have a store like Amazon from which to use voice control in a helpful fashion, the company needed a compelling reason for people to purchase the HomePod. Given that Siri is already in everyone's iPhone and computer, why purchase a HomePod that can only accomplish very limited tasks for the foreseeable future? Much like MQA, Apple has pushed the HomePod as a very high quality sounding device and no doubt talked to the influencers about how good the device sounds. Without sound quality, the HomePod has no purpose. 

     

    "The Apple HomePod Sounds Good, but Other Smart Speakers Sound Better"

    "In CR audio testing, Google Home Max and Sonos One come out ahead"

    - Consumer Reports


    Perhaps some normalcy has now been added to the hysteria. I agree with Consumer Reports. I really wanted to like the HomePod and I wanted to to sound fantastic. The truth is, the HomePod is good and I'd recommend it to people who have to have Apple products. If people want a voice assistant, get a voice assistant. If people want a loudspeaker, get a loudspeaker. Splitting the duties provides much more flexibility to purchase the best of both worlds. Google and Amazon offer far better products for voice. With respect to sound quality, there are many other products I'd recommend over the HomePod, starting with The Three from Klipsch. 

     

     

     

    Here comes a shocker (not), my HomePod is now up for sale on Superhonica (LINK).

     

     

    Screen Shot 2018-02-13 at 4.29.07 PM.png

     

     

     

     


     




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    12 hours ago, PeterG said:

     

    Please--Apple has more than anybody(?) to shift the listening market to low quality sound, degrading the experience for us all. 

    I always take issue with comments like this ... Yes: Apple brought iTunes Store downloaded (lossy compressed music) to the masses ... but for the masses this is a STEP UP from the systems they were listening to music on in the past.  Every iPod has sounded better than every (with a few exceptions which were outliers) Walkman or Discman (and non-Sony generic alternatives) which it replaced given similar level of headphone.  Most iPod / iPhone docks sound better than the desktop "ghetto blaster" they replaced.  Most consumers have never had high end audio.

     

    In saying Apple ruined "audiophile" you are comparing oranges to ... well Apples!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 hours ago, PeterG said:

     

    Please--Apple has more than anybody(?) to shift the listening market to low quality sound, degrading the experience for us all.  An iTunes store that pushes singles instead of albums (thus encouraging producers to increase loudness and reduce dynamic range), delivered as low res files (or even lower if you're running low on storage!), onto garbage earbuds that further discourage investments in sound quality and encourage low dynamic range.

     

    Love their computers, phones, and tablets; hate what they've done with music

     

    You aren't even thinking about the period of time that Apple introduced the iTunes Store.  It wasn't a few years ago.  It was way back in April of 2003.  Back then, the music industry was being decimated by Napster and other sharing technologies.  And if you got your music from there (as so many of us did), it was very low quality stuff....128 kb/sec files, yes but also 64 and 32 kb/sec files too.  You were lucky to find a 320 kb/sec MP3 file of your favorite album.  But the quality was all over the place since you were relying on whatever software people had lying around to do the rips and transcodes.

     

    So Apple introduces a store that artists and labels could actually make some money off of, had consistent quality and yes, wasn't illegal piracy (I live in Nashville where this is a very big deal).  They used AAC as a standard instead of MP3 which was higher quality.  But why 128 kb/sec files?  Do you remember what "broadband" internet was on average back in 2003?  I do....speeds were measured in kilobits per second, not megabits per second.  According to Pew Research, only 31% of households in the US had "broadband" which meant that nearly 7 of ten households either had dialup or nothing at all.  Cable modems were just getting out of their infancy period in the late 90s (I had one in '97) but most people had ISDN/DSL from a phone company at anywhere from 128 kbit/sec to 1.5 mb/sec if you were lucky.  So Apple was coming to market in a period where most people still had 56 kb/sec dialup (assuming it was that good) or maybe early broadband.  And just for perspective, Netflix was still a "DVD in the mail" only business.

     

    Now fast forward to today...we can debate why Apple hasn't done a CD-quality service like Tidal when they certainly have the technical means to do so.  And Apple has been asking for hi-res versions of music from labels for a while in order to master their 256 kb/sec AAC content.  But it's unknown whether Apple just doesn't want to do it or of the main content providers don't want them to do it.  Ever since Apple introduced the iTunes store, it continued the industry disruption began by Napster from rampant piracy to a single technology player made strong by iPod sales and later, a leviathan by iPhone sales.  Before iTunes, the leading seller of music in the US was Wal-Mart which exerted a large amount of control over the record industry.  Now they traded that relationship for one with Apple where they all feel they ceded even more control of their business model.  Here in Nashville, the music industry is finally growing again in revenue as of 2017 versus years of decline since the early 2000s.  That industry treats Apple with a large amount of trepidation, even though it owes it's very survival to them.  What we've seen in years since 2003 was attempts by the industry to even the playing field by offering advantageous deals to companies like Amazon (before they became a leviathan in their own right) or other content delivery mechanisms.  And one of those other delivery mechanisms was streaming...which ended up disrupting the industry (again!) so here we are.

     

    Need anymore proof that the industry just doesn't do everything new with Apple anymore?  How many video (TV/movie) cord-cutting packages are available now, including Google's YouTube but strangely, Apple isn't among them.  They certainly tried bringing one to market ages ago according to the tech press, but Hollywood is afraid of Apple's disruptive power (even more so than Google!).

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    21 hours ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

    Thanks for the comments. 

     

    Why is my executive summary a problem, given that so much of the press had called the HomePod an audiophile product? I received many emails asking if this was true in my opinion and asking if I had one for review. 

     

    Question: Without a reference, how does one rate sound quality? How can I determine what the HomePod sounds like if I don't have a reference? I can't. Anyone who claims they can, is kidding themselves. It's impossible to suggest the HomePod has too much bass if I'm comparing it to another speaker that isn't of reference quality. Sure it may have more bass than the Klipsch, but the Klipsch is by no means a reference either. 

     

    I included both my reference system and the Klipsch to satisfy people who wanted to learn how the HomePod compares to a reference and how it compares to something in a similar category. I guess I can't please everyone. 

     

    I don't see my speculation as a really big problem. Given the previous measurements posted on reddit and retweeted by Phil Schiller, I couldn't help but think something was amiss. It turns out that something was amiss. As of today, it appears the measurements don't really say what author the suggested and they may be suspect. 

     

    I'm not really worried about speculating what Apple is doing or worried that someone is going to sue them. I also don't buy into the idea that Apple is holier than thou as a company. As soon as it stops using slave labor, I might be more open to thinking about it. Apple is beholden to shareholders. Given that fact, all bets are off. 

     

    You didn't address my point.  Apple is not calling the HomePod an audiophile product.  The fact that a review or two used the word didn't change that.  And frankly, the world "audiophile" means different things to different people.

     

    Which gets me to your next point....what should be a reference?  Well, how about a reasonable accounting for price and intended use?  By your measure, if an automotive journalist reviews a Chevy Tahoe, the "reference" vehicle must be a Bentley Bentayga because both are large SUVs.  No one does that and neither should you.

     

    And your speculation is the biggest problem of the article.  You're a respected website visited by thousands who make purchasing decisions based upon the articles and the forum commentary.  I have no problem with you poking holes in the methodology of the review on Reddit, assuming it's on the merits by your own testing or obvious flaws in his methodology.  But to make a leap to accusing Apple of cheating with no proof is journalistic malpractice.  it was unnecessary and detracted from your argument.

     

    I'm not saying that Apple is holier than thou.  I am saying that they aren't stupid.  And intentionally making modifications to the DSP algorithms when test tones are played would be class-action lawsuit stupid.   And Apple deals with enough of these lawsuits from frivolous stuff not to invite more of them, and the horrific press that would come from it being a market leader.  And if it were the case, people would find out eventually and lots of people would get fired.

     

    Remember Volkswagen?  Nobody wants to be those guys.

     

    Slave labor?  If you're referring to Chinese labor practices, that's another conversation for the entire consumer electronics industry.  Again, not a proper retort for this discussion.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, Sevenfeet said:

    not a proper retort for this discussion

    I don't believe I could ever satisfy your requirements for a proper retort.

     

    We obviously disagree on quite a bit. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

    I don't believe I could ever satisfy your requirements for a proper retort.

     

    We obviously disagree on quite a bit. 

     

    Don't get me wrong....I LOVE good debate.  I just hate poor arguments. :)

     

    This hobby is about as subjective as they come.  But as the operator of site I visit regularly, I rely on you and your team to be critical but fair in your evaluations since the rest of us are consumers in the industry.  If I can't rely on that, they it lessens your credibility elsewhere.

     

    One way you could have mitigated my response would have been something like "This isn't a fair fight, but I usually compare everything regardless of price to my CR1's so..."

     

    Speaking of cars, this reminds of when Car and Driver back in the 1960s compared the Ferrari GTO to the Pontiac GTO just because of the name.  Were they anything alike?  Not really.  Did they admit the comparison test was completely silly?  Absolutely.  And therefore, the reader could put away their critical eye for a few pages and enjoy the ride, so to speak.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, ShawnC said:

    Give it a rest. 

     

    Agreed.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    @Sevenfeet:   

     

    Since you hate flawed arguments, I think the thing to point out here is that your assumption that Chris is being unfair by comparing the sound produced by the Homepod to that of his "reference" high-end system misses the point.  Chris elsewhere says that a more reasonable comparison of products would be to compare to the "Klipsch: The Three" bluetooth speaker, or a Sonos.  The point of the "reference" system is to have a positive control for unadulterated high-quality sound, not to compare two sets of hardware per se.

     

    Unless you have a way to play Eddie Vedder's "Society" that allows you to hear what it is supposed to sound like with a high degree of confidence, then you can't really claim that playback of the same tract through the Apple Homepod sounds distorted.  The high-end reference system allows you to do so with a much greater degree of confidence than, say, a Sonos or bluetooth speaker of comparable quality/cost.

     

    As for the DSP, this result surprised me.  The measurement I glanced at made the room response look quite reasonable and flat.  What appears to be happening is that for an actual, known Apple music file, the DSP is adaptive.  It might be as something as simplistic as cranking up the bass based on the "Genre" tag, or it might do something a bit more sophisticated.  That hardly makes Apple the functional/moral equivalent of Volkswagen, and pointing this out isn't an accusation that Apple is cheating. Apple in fact appears to market this as a feature.  Chris is observing that at least in some cases, the adaptive DSP can go horribly wrong.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, wgscott said:

    @Sevenfeet:   

     

    Since you hate flawed arguments, I think the thing to point out here is that your assumption that Chris is being unfair by comparing the sound produced by the Homepod to that of his "reference" high-end system misses the point.  Chris elsewhere says that a more reasonable comparison of products would be to compare to the "Klipsch: The Three" bluetooth speaker, or a Sonos.  The point of the "reference" system is to have a positive control for unadulterated high-quality sound, not to compare two sets of hardware per se.

     

    Unless you have a way to play Eddie Vedder's "Society" that allows you to hear what it is supposed to sound like with a high degree of confidence, then you can't really claim that playback of the same tract through the Apple Homepod sounds distorted.  The high-end reference system allows you to do so with a much greater degree of confidence than, say, a Sonos or bluetooth speaker of comparable quality/cost.

     

    As for the DSP, this result surprised me.  The measurement I glanced at made the room response look quite reasonable and flat.  What appears to be happening is that for an actual, known Apple music file, the DSP is adaptive.  It might be as something as simplistic as cranking up the bass based on the "Genre" tag, or it might do something a bit more sophisticated.  That hardly makes Apple the functional/moral equivalent of Volkswagen.

     

    @WGScott

     

    Your first two paragraphs...now that's a good retort!  And a good point taken.  Thanks!

     

    Yes, Apple's DSP algorithms do seem to be adaptive since it's already been published that they use music and the built in microphones to build it's own curve based upon the room.  And I imagine that there will be some situations and environments it will sound better than others.  To quote the car industry again, "Your mileage may vary".

     

    And one more point....David Pogue or Yahoo! recently published a blind test of the HomePod against the Echo, Sonus and Google Home with a group of people including one professional musician who didn't even know what they were listening to.  The result?  The HomePod wasn't the winner (as he predicted since that was his personal favorite).  Again, how we process music is very subjective and it was a fascinating read.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 2/14/2018 at 10:50 PM, bobfa said:

     

     

    I wanted to add a bit more to my thoughts here.  There are two other people in my home; my wife and my son.  We are pretty comfortable with using Amazon Echo devices. In addtion  I have a "REALLY GOOD" main stereo system in the Living Room that fills the first and second floor with music if the doors to the bedrooms are open.    But operating the stereo is a lot harder than talking to a magic box in the corner to tell it to play music.  

     

    There are a lot of limitations on Siri and the HomePod that I knew about before purchase. 

     

    More tomorrow,...

    Today I sent the HomePods back to Apple.  This decision was predicated on several things. 

     

    1. The audio quality is "interesting",...  Apple has created a sound that I describe as uncomfortable. Too much bottom, not enough detail, not enough middle.

    2. The integration with Apple services is very weak and it does not work in a multiple person household.

    3.  Apple Music works well and I cannot fault it for what it is. The integration with Homepod is very good.  I do not need Apple Music except for this.

    4.  The controls and configuration of HomePod in the Apple Home App is just plain odd.  It kind of works but needs a LOT of UI work.

    5.  The AI domains are very limited on the HomePod rendering it neutered and less than useful.

    6.  Little things are annoying such as the inability to control Alarm volume or type.  The whole timer and alarm controls, weird.

    7.  Yes I know that almost all of this is software but I have less patience than I used to.

    8.  I have a VERY GOOD system to listen to and I do not need the HomePod for "performance listening"

     

    So a bit more narrative is needed here.  First on home automation.  I have rather simple needs that HomePod did not enhance.  I have shared calendars and shared task lists that it could not address or manage well.  I have simple lighting automation that only requires occasional intervention and the is very little need for additional features that the HomePod might bring.

     

    I will write more on this later on Friday!  

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     "The  Apple HomePod  - an Audiophile Perspective."

    Oh come on. If you were bored you could have gone outside and oiled your motorbike or cut the grass.

     

    "Towards a Unified Field Theory - an  Earwig's  Perspective" would make more sense :)

     

    Voice?

    I can make my dCS, Naim, Tannoy system play  the Beatles though Cortana,  but it can't find the "the Third Movement" of something  I can't remember unless I look at the cover art

    And anyway it takes far longer  to say all that than touching a screen or clicking a mouse. So  what's the ****ing point?

    Gizmology gone mad.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On ‎13‎/‎02‎/‎2018 at 11:10 PM, DuckToller said:

     ... here in France .....does not accept......due to my accent ;-) ... 

     

    Try shouting at it.

    When we of the UK had an empire shouting worked fine on the 'natives' :D

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Spacehound said:

    Try shouting at it.

    When we of the UK had an empire shouting worked fine on the 'natives' :D

    I very much prefer not to be liaised with the small man shouting at my grandfather's generation for giving them an imperial impression. However, strangely enough, most french people assign my accent rather to your brave island than to their eastern European neighbour.

    Cheers Tom

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, bobfa said:

    Today I sent the HomePods back to Apple.  This decision was predicated on several things. 

     

    1. The audio quality is "interesting",...  Apple has created a sound that I describe as uncomfortable. Too much bottom, not enough detail, not enough middle.

    2. The integration with Apple services is very weak and it does not work in a multiple person household.

    3.  Apple Music works well and I cannot fault it for what it is. The integration with Homepod is very good.  I do not need Apple Music except for this.

    4.  The controls and configuration of HomePod in the Apple Home App is just plain odd.  It kind of works but needs a LOT of UI work.

    5.  The AI domains are very limited on the HomePod rendering it neutered and less than useful.

    6.  Little things are annoying such as the inability to control Alarm volume or type.  The whole timer and alarm controls, weird.

    7.  Yes I know that almost all of this is software but I have less patience than I used to.

    8.  I have a VERY GOOD system to listen to and I do not need the HomePod for "performance listening"

     

    So a bit more narrative is needed here.  First on home automation.  I have rather simple needs that HomePod did not enhance.  I have shared calendars and shared task lists that it could not address or manage well.  I have simple lighting automation that only requires occasional intervention and the is very little need for additional features that the HomePod might bring.

     

    I will write more on this later on Friday!  

     

     

    All very good reasons.  I have a house full of Apple equipment and for right now, I can't see a place in it for the HomePod since most places in my house that I want music already have it via Airplay to other devices, usually to discreet loudspeakers.  And unlike some of the people here, I haven't heard it yet either so I have no idea if I'll like the sound profile.  I guess I could use it as a glorified speakerphone/speaker for my Mac Pro but that an expensive proposition for that use.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, bobfa said:

    Today I sent the HomePods back to Apple.  This decision was predicated on several things. 

     

    1. The audio quality is "interesting",...  Apple has created a sound that I describe as uncomfortable. Too much bottom, not enough detail, not enough middle.

    2. The integration with Apple services is very weak and it does not work in a multiple person household.

    3.  Apple Music works well and I cannot fault it for what it is. The integration with Homepod is very good.  I do not need Apple Music except for this.

    4.  The controls and configuration of HomePod in the Apple Home App is just plain odd.  It kind of works but needs a LOT of UI work.

    5.  The AI domains are very limited on the HomePod rendering it neutered and less than useful.

    6.  Little things are annoying such as the inability to control Alarm volume or type.  The whole timer and alarm controls, weird.

    7.  Yes I know that almost all of this is software but I have less patience than I used to.

    8.  I have a VERY GOOD system to listen to and I do not need the HomePod for "performance listening"

     

    So a bit more narrative is needed here.  First on home automation.  I have rather simple needs that HomePod did not enhance.  I have shared calendars and shared task lists that it could not address or manage well.  I have simple lighting automation that only requires occasional intervention and the is very little need for additional features that the HomePod might bring.

     

    I will write more on this later on Friday!  

     

    I do not want to be overly critical about the audio quality of the HomePod.  In my office, the bedroom and when you are a bit further away from it the sound is actually very very good.  I have a long term relationship with high quality audio reproduction and Apple has really done a good job on this thing.  It does stuff that almost any other all-in-one audio component does not do; room correction, and all of that.  For a whole lot of Apple's target market this is a great 1.0 product.  A lot of energy went into this thing.  A single audio component that can play streaming music at this reproduction quality and cost is a good value proposition.  IF YOU ARE IN THE APPLE ECOSYSTEM.  I would like to add an additional caveat you are a single household.  This is almost frictionless for delivering music to the home.

     

    I have seen a lot of talk on the tech-blogs about use cases that they think the HomePod can fill.  I have seen a lot of talk about using the HomePod with your TV.  I do not see that as valuable and it really speaks to the fact that most modern TVs have TERRIBLE audio.  Some sort of sound bar system would be a better value.  Now Apple could do the Dolby decoding and stereo pairs and surround simulation with all that computing power.  But without an optical input from the TV the application to this modality is weak.

     

    In an apartment or your bedroom one of these gives a lot of musical value. 

     

    -------------------

    The "AI" and voice control

    I am all in on Apple computing products.  I use an iMac for my main computer, Mac Laptops, iPad, iPhone, Watch,  Apple TV, and more..  The way the systems work hand in hand and the overall systems design is a notch above just about anything else.  When Apple bought Siri a lot of us were excited to have Apple work through the privacy and availability.  And the progress on Siri has been laudable.  Apple is not moving fast enough for the tech press and they talk and write a lot about what Siri can do.    The voice response system on the HomePod is nothing short of amazing.  The music can be blaring away and I can talk in a quiet voice and it hears me just fine.   The issue is what it can do with what it hears.  The press is brutal in it's evaluation of the HomePod on this functionality.  If I ask it to play the Beatles it will do that.  Now if you have 10 variants of something from the Grateful Dead I am pretty sure you will run into issues.

     

     This whole thing is a very powerful integration of Computers and Audio.  I know that my wife would like the main stereo system in the house to be this responsive to voice control. This is one implementation of the future of Voice First interaction technology.  More of this will be in our future.  Organizing and delivering the right track out of 40 million is a daunting task.  This is a good start.

     

    I am going to stop now for a bit.  There is one more section on information security that I would like to address in that it was part of my reason to bring the HomePod into my systems.  I will finish that up in a while.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, bobfa said:

    I do not want to be overly critical about the audio quality of the HomePod.  In my office, the bedroom and when you are a bit further away from it the sound is actually very very good.  I have a long term relationship with high quality audio reproduction and Apple has really done a good job on this thing.  It does stuff that almost any other all-in-one audio component does not do; room correction, and all of that.  For a whole lot of Apple's target market this is a great 1.0 product.  A lot of energy went into this thing.  A single audio component that can play streaming music at this reproduction quality and cost is a good value proposition.  IF YOU ARE IN THE APPLE ECOSYSTEM.  I would like to add an additional caveat you are a single household.  This is almost frictionless for delivering music to the home.

     

    I have seen a lot of talk on the tech-blogs about use cases that they think the HomePod can fill.  I have seen a lot of talk about using the HomePod with your TV.  I do not see that as valuable and it really speaks to the fact that most modern TVs have TERRIBLE audio.  Some sort of sound bar system would be a better value.  Now Apple could do the Dolby decoding and stereo pairs and surround simulation with all that computing power.  But without an optical input from the TV the application to this modality is weak.

     

    In an apartment or your bedroom one of these gives a lot of musical value. 

     

    -------------------

    The "AI" and voice control

    I am all in on Apple computing products.  I use an iMac for my main computer, Mac Laptops, iPad, iPhone, Watch,  Apple TV, and more..  The way the systems work hand in hand and the overall systems design is a notch above just about anything else.  When Apple bought Siri a lot of us were excited to have Apple work through the privacy and availability.  And the progress on Siri has been laudable.  Apple is not moving fast enough for the tech press and they talk and write a lot about what Siri can do.    The voice response system on the HomePod is nothing short of amazing.  The music can be blaring away and I can talk in a quiet voice and it hears me just fine.   The issue is what it can do with what it hears.  The press is brutal in it's evaluation of the HomePod on this functionality.  If I ask it to play the Beatles it will do that.  Now if you have 10 variants of something from the Grateful Dead I am pretty sure you will run into issues.

     

     This whole thing is a very powerful integration of Computers and Audio.  I know that my wife would like the main stereo system in the house to be this responsive to voice control. This is one implementation of the future of Voice First interaction technology.  More of this will be in our future.  Organizing and delivering the right track out of 40 million is a daunting task.  This is a good start.

     

    I am going to stop now for a bit.  There is one more section on information security that I would like to address in that it was part of my reason to bring the HomePod into my systems.  I will finish that up in a while.

    OK here is my final segment.  I want to talk about information security.  

     

    I assume that many on this forum walk around with some sort of mobile device on our pocket all the time. So we are all carrying around a potential "wireless bug".  Introducing another device into our homes that has a microphone and an internet connection does not necessarily increase our security risk, although it has a possibility higher potential to be attacked and compromised.

     

    So if you have a device with a microphone it is a potential bug.  The switch on top of an Amazon echo is a software driven push button that tells the computer to turn on the red light and turn off the microphone system in some manner.  The HomePod has a voice command to turn off listening which is again software.  The HomePod has no visual indication that the device is in a not-listening state.  As these are software switches it is possible that they could be compromised.  I would think that with Apple the risk might be lower as they are very vocal about their controls in this space.

     

    Now the real meat of the problem is in intent.  Apple intends the voice to control and input data.  They appear to have no incentive to monetize your voice or keep data around.  Their differential privacy system appears to be robust.

     

    Amazon sells the Echo devices to keep you in their system and to keep you buying from them.  Their system does use cloud based technologies and the voice information in one form or another is available to them.  You can see on their App or on the website the voice information about what you asked or told the device. There may be more exposure here but it is hard to validate.

     

    Google has a different motivation in this.  They want you to GIVE them data about you that they can use to sell to advertisers to target you.  Now they do that by inference but it does feel more intrusive or creepy to see the ads hitting you after a search.  The knowledge about YOU is the product that Google sells to their customers.

     

    Microsoft is a new player to this game and their Cortana software is now appearing in devices like the HomePod.  I have no experience with this hardware or how Microsoft implements their software stack.  I am suspect of their motivations.  Windows 10 bothers me a lot!  I find their security statements to be cryptic.

    -----

    I jumped too fast assuming that Apple did what I want them do to and I was disappointed.  I have never had to return an Apple product. 

     

    I am back to using the Amazon Echo devices in my home. They provide a service that I currently want including voice activated music playback although not at the quality level of the HomePod.  The Echo devices are "just good enough" to listen to.  AKA AM/FM radio.

     

    Sorry if this seems a bit OT but it is relevant to my potential use cases for HomePod.   

     

    -RJF

     

    Note that I work in Information Technology and I hold two security certifications CISSP and CISM Retired.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well first of all, no-one ever said that it is an audiophile product.

     

    Not even people who made it. The rest is nothing but a circular waves that turned into a positive expression and transformed it into something fascinating word so called "audiophile". Hell nowhere it's an audiophile speaker not even close but it puts all other smart speakers into dust. And that's exactly what most reviewers were trying to send the message out.

     

    The reason some folks mentioned an audiophile word is just an expression that how good this smart-speaker is that it the best one out there which produces a great sound among the others at the same level. Its a good start from Apple that can be further improved in the future. 

     

    It is not going to replace my audiophile gear at all which is more expensive than my Range Rover. But for the purpose HomePod is built, it does its job a lot better than others in the market available today.

     

    Sound really is subjective. I like reading many articles/reviews in this forum, and I laugh on many as well, no matter where they are coming from. 

     

    Nothing in this world is perfect and nothing will ever be.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I was somewhat comforted by this review.  To think that Apple might have rendered all my expensive gear and endless tweaking irrelevant with some technical magic was reminiscent of my other hobby, my Digital SLR.  I own a nice camera and several carefully selected prime lenses that, as recently as a few years ago, would wow my friends with image quality that put their iPhone cameras to shame.  They would encourage me to bring my gear to their weddings and kid's birthday parties so I could provide a few keepsakes.  But lately, not so much.  The iPhone cameras have gotten a lot better and, although my images are still nicer, most would say the iPhone images are "good enough."  It seems that for now we still live in an audiophile golden age where if you do your research you can build a rare audiophile system that you and your friends can enjoy and appreciate its extraordinary realistic sound. Of course, like with cameras, Apple will keep pushing the envelope, and like most golden ages, no one will appreciate this one until it is over.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Did anyone try this speaker in his/her bathroom?

     

    I plan to place it there when it becomes available in my country.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris,

     

    Could you share some details on the room placement of the HomePod for your listening tests. Given you seemed to have some fairly uneven frequency response from the  HomePod it would be interesting to hear how it reacted to different speaker placement options. I understand it does have does have DSP capability and some people will place it were the wife gives it the highest acceptance factor but like all audiophiles we will put more effort into speaker placement before undertaking critical listening.

     

    Regards

    Mark

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    19 hours ago, Fridolin said:

    Did anyone try this speaker in his/her bathroom?

     

    I plan to place it there when it becomes available in my country.

     

    I didn't try this, but be very cautious. The bass could be overwhelming in a confined space like many bathrooms.

     

     

     

     

     

     

    13 hours ago, twist222 said:

    Chris,

     

    Could you share some details on the room placement of the HomePod for your listening tests. Given you seemed to have some fairly uneven frequency response from the  HomePod it would be interesting to hear how it reacted to different speaker placement options. I understand it does have does have DSP capability and some people will place it were the wife gives it the highest acceptance factor but like all audiophiles we will put more effort into speaker placement before undertaking critical listening.

     

    Regards

    Mark

     

     

    I tried the HomePod in a couple locations. 

     

    1. On my desk about 12-18 inches from the rear wall, with my iMac about 24 inches to the right and nothing to the left. 

     

    2. On my preamp about 24 inches from the rear wall and between my amps and speakers. 

     

     

     

     

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I did a critical listen to the HomePod on the Apple Store shelf, at least as best I could given the store noise in the evenings.  I wish I could have turned the bass compensation down a little, but it wasn't bad.  The treble was never peaky or irritating like so many things I've heard.  It's not audiophile sound, and while I didn't try to estimate its absolute tonality for things like piano or upright bass, it seemed adequate for background play, or checking out new music to buy or not buy.  I'd love to purchase two of them, but I'll wait for the Bluetooth-operated version.  I had some self-powered Audioengine speakers that weren't bad, but I like the multi-directional concept the HomePod was designed for.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...