Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile
    The Computer Audiophile

    Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC Reference Series Review

    thumb.jpg

    1-Pixel.png

    Rarely do I hear a component that's truly a game changer, a component that's so good I can't stop listening through it, and a component that's so good it renders much of the competition irrelevant. I can't remember, off the top of my head, the last time I heard such a component. That is, before the Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC Reference Series arrived. The Alpha DAC RS, every bit a true game changer, blew me away from the first listen in my system. Since its arrival I've listened to more complete albums and heard more new sounds from old albums than any time in my life. The Alpha DAC RS is so good and such a game changer it may force consumers to reconsider their desire for high resolution music. Sure the Alpha DAC RS can reproduce high resolution music better than any DAC I've heard in my system, but its absolute magic can be heard with standard CD quality 16 bit / 44.1 kHz material. The Alpha DAC RS is without question the best DAC I've heard anywhere when it comes to 16/44.1 playback. I've never heard detail, delicacy, and transparency with my favorite music like I have when listening through this DAC. The Alpha DAC RS is so outstanding that I equate its presence in my system to that of a new pair of loudspeakers. That's correct; the Alpha DAC RS had an impact on my system equivalent to a new pair of loudspeakers. In fact, the Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC Reference Series is the most remarkable sounding product I've ever reviewed. [PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]

     

     

    Alpha DAC Reference Series

     

     

    The Berkeley Audio Design team is well known for pursuing perfection of performance and producing peerless products. The original Alpha DAC is considered by many to be the best $5,000 DAC money can buy. The company's subsequent USB to AES converter has been unequalled when it comes to sound quality and electrical isolation in D-to-D converters. Pushing boundaries and shooting for unparalleled performance is not an easy task and frequently takes quite a bit of time. Such is the case with the Alpha DAC Reference Series. According to Berkeley Audio Design's Michael Ritter, the Alpha DAC RS contains proprietary parts that didn't exist prior to the creation of the DAC. During the initial design stages of the RS 'Berkeley' asked several manufacturers to build certain parts to its specifications. All but one of the companies said no because it was difficult to build and there was no market for such impeccably spec'd parts. In addition the cost of the parts ended up being 40x greater than parts used in the Alpha DAC Series 2 or the Alpha USB.

     

    Internal parts are but one piece of the Alpha DAC RS puzzle. The other major piece is intellectual property. 'Berkeley' previously made a $5,000 DAC sound as good as or better than many DACs costing several times more money. To do this requires the intellectual know-how that other DAC manufacturers, who just assemble parts and follow chip manufacturers' app notes, simply don't have. Talking to Berkeley's lead Engineer Michael "Pflash" Pflaumer, it's clear that the Alpha DAC RS contains engineering wizardry and original ideas that the previous 'Berkeley' products don't contain. The Alpha DAC RS isn't a sibling of the original Alpha DAC, rather it's a close cousin. Both DACs have the same designer, but the Reference Series is so above and beyond that it's in a league of its own. This time, using a mix of proprietary parts and vast intellectual property, Berkeley Audio Design has created a $16,000 DAC that may be the best in the world at any price.

     

    One of the strengths of the Alpha DAC RS that make it such a great component is its ability to playback standard resolution (16/44.1) material better than any DAC I've heard. According to many DAC designers, playback of standard resolution is where the rubber meets the road, not only because the vast majority of music is released at 16/44.1, but because it takes considerable expertise to develop digital filters for CD quality material. This is where Berkeley Audio Design excels. Michael "Pflash" Pflaumer's digital filter mastery is the stuff of legend in high end audio. One only needs to listen to the Alpha DAC RS at 16/44.1 to hear Pflash's superior skills shine. There's no chip a manufacture can purchase and implement that comes close to replicating 'Berkeley's' custom filtering technology.

     

    Now for the fun part, telling the world how the Alpha DAC RS sounds with some of my favorite music. The RS single handedly sent me into a Natalie Merchant binge that lasted a couple weeks. I couldn't stop listening to Natalie's new self-titled album and her Motherland release from 2001. Both albums are the standard issue, released at 44.1 kHz and not remastered. The detail and delicacy brought out by the Alpha DAC RS on both albums is unparalleled. For example, the track Maggie Said from the 2014 Natalie Merchant album has incredible separation and delineation between instruments. So much so that I can't get this good of sound even through my Sennheiser HD600, Audeze LCD-XC, or JH Audio JH13 in-ear monitors. The first track on the album, Lady Bird, opens with a delicate drum roll. Listening through other DACs and even through headphones, the drums tend to sound like paper, as if the drummer is striking a couple sheets of loose leaf paper from the Dollar Store. Through the Alpha DAC RS it's possible to hear the texture of the drum heads. I'm willing to bet any competent drummer could identify the exact drum kit, and even the sticks used by the drummer, after listening to this track through the Alpha DAC RS.

     

    Continuing my Natalie Merchant kick, I spent countless hours listening to her Motherland album. Track two, titled Motherland, features a guitar, banjo, accordion, and some of the richest sounding vocals Natalie has ever produced. I've never heard this track sound so good and Natalie's vocals sound as wonderful as I have when listening through the Alpha DAC RS. The delicate accordion comes and goes in the background landing like a butterfly with sore feet. The banjo and guitar have terrifically distinct sounds that can be heard even at the lowest volumes through the 'RS'. In fact, I've never heard a DAC excel more at low volumes than the Alpha DAC RS. Listening to the entire Motherland album I kept the volume at such low levels that the crickets outside my listening room drowned out the quiet passages more than a few times. This is in stark contrast to listening through some DACs that lack resolution and force the listener to turn up the volume a notch for every track. After an hour of listening one's ears are tired and ready to retire for the evening. My experience with the Alpha DAC RS couldn't be more the opposite. I never wanted to stop listening once during the entire review period.

     

    Classical music isn't traditionally one of my favorite genres. However, when a component like the Alpha DAC RS is placed into my system I feel the need to listen to all of my music as if it was all new. During this review I frequently said to myself, "I wonder what X or Y sounds like through the RS." It was as close to the kid before Christmas feeling as I could have as an adult. Thus, I played the Kansas City Symphony's Britten's Orchestra recorded and released at 24 bit / 176.4 kHz by Reference Recordings. This album demonstrated the Alpha DAC RS' ability to reproduce transients like no other DAC I've heard. About 4:20 into the track Passacaglia things get real interesting. The horns start out quite delicate augmenting the string section that is building the scene. By 5:30 into the track the horn section is leading the way in the most transparent sounding symphonic reproduction I've yet heard. At 5:45 into the track the deep horns start to snap and the drums create an incredible sounding crescendo. Then all is quiet with the exception of a soft and delicate string section in recovery from the event that just took place. Throughout the track the Alpha DAC RS appears to only reproduce the music. There's no memorializing of an event after it happens and there certainly are no rounded edges of transients. This DAC starts and stops like no other.

     

    Organic and transparent is how I describe listening to Jack Johnson's Brushfire Fairytales through the Alpha DAC RS. This isn't the most well recorded album, but through the 'RS' something magical comes out of each track. The Alpha DAC RS isn't adding anything or forcing a Hi-Fi signature on the album, rather more sounds and nuances are coming through now than ever before through any other DAC. The track Flake features a very soft steel drum in the left channel and acoustic guitar in the right channel at the beginning. The guitar sounds incredibly organic and realistic while the steel drum smoothly floats in the background with its soft presence. Through less resolute DACs I frequently turn up the volume during this part of the track because I can't hear the steel drum enough for my liking. Through the Alpha DAC RS the steel drum magically comes through appropriately soft but appropriately present. It's really magical to hear these seemingly antithetical (soft / present) characteristics come through with delicacy and transparency like never before.

     

    Closing out the review period I wanted to push the bass limits of the Alpha DAC RS. What I had heard up to this point was incredibly tight and deep bass from more traditional sources like rock and roll and jazz. It was time for a little Jay Z, one of my favorite hip hop artists of all time. Jay Z's MTV Unplugged (with the Roots band) is a great sounding album but it doesn't have the bass of the Magna Carta... Holy Grail album. After warming up with MTV Unplugged I switched to track Holy Grail featuring Justin Timberlake. A synthetic piano and somewhat synthetic sounding vocal start the track before a huge bass beat kicks in. Under the right conditions I'm sure one could blow woofers into a listener's lap. Fortunately the track isn't just a bass monster / demo track. The deep beat is great as are the lyrics with a sample of Nirvana's Smells Like Teen Spirit. The Alpha DAC RS puts out the deepest and tightest bass of any DAC I've yet heard. Listening to this deep tight bass gave me a similar feeling to listening to soft and present steel drums from Jack Johnson. The deep bass was omnipresent as it was supposed to be, but it wasn't overpowering. Jay Z's and Timberlake's vocals were clearly audible and intelligible as were the plethora of other sounds going on in the track. Chalk this magic up to the Alpha DAC RS and its brilliant designer Michael "Pflash" Pflaumer and the rest of the 'Berkeley' team who took part in creating the best DAC on the market.

     

     

    Conclusion

     

     

    The Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC Reference Series is a DAC for the ages. Delicacy, detail, and unparalleled transparency are hallmarks of the RS. Reproducing soft yet present background instruments as clearly as the lead guitar is something only the Alpha DAC RS has done in my system. This DAC is capable of hooking the listener in to hours long listening sessions even at the expense of getting other work done. In other words, the Alpha DAC RS reproduces addicting sound. The Reference Series is what the term "game changer" was meant to describe. It's a PCM only DAC that renders most other universal DACs on the market irrelevant. Irrelevant because they cost more and don't sound as good. A DAC that can make standard resolution (16/44.1) material sound as good as high resolution is a true game changer. The advanced digital filtering algorithms created by Berkeley Audio Design do exactly that with 16/44.1 music. I know of no DAC available today that can reproduce Redbook CD content as well as the Alpha DAC RS. Period. If I could afford it and my job allowed it, the Alpha DAC RS is the only DAC I'd use for the foreseeable future.

     

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

    Image Gallery

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]14424[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]14429[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]14426[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]14423[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]14427[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]14428[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]14425[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]14430[/ATTACH]

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

     

    Product Information:

    • Product - Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC Reference Series
    • Price - $16,000
    • Product Page - Link

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

    Where To Buy:

     

    The Audio Salon

     

    tas.jpg

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

    Ciamara

     

    ciamara.png

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

     

    Associated Music:

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

    Associated Equipment:

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Yes I have been using the newest firmware in the DAC 2X for a while.

    And what's your opinion?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am a proud of owner Berkeley Series 2 DAC and I'm now forced to consider upgrading to RS.

     

    Chris, I thought your review was informative and great, and I welcome any additional thoughts on the difference between Ser 2 and RS. I think might just need to pull the trigger.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Awsmone - Thanks for the comments and questions. Maybe I'll get to learn something here (I love that!).

     

    Benjamin Britten' s " Passacaglia" that I am referring to is the Reference Recordings version (HR-120) (Michael Stern / Kansas City Symphony). Here is a link Reference Recordings - HRx Details

     

    I am far from an expert in identifying each instrument although I hear the distinctly different sounds. The specific "deep horns" I'm talking about may be the tuba. The sound comes from the right channel.

     

    I hope you have a chance to listen to this version of Passacaglia and teach me a little bit about the different instruments :~)

     

    Hi Chris

     

    I don't have that recording by RR

     

    Working on the time you mentioned from the score

     

    The first and second horns on the left are then joined by third and fourth horns on the LEFT and doubled by trombones on the RIGHT ( this May not be the case in your recording but is most common set up of orchestra

    The tuba plays single notes doubling the beat of the TIMPANI is centre or far right

     

    This is quite clear on the recordings I have

     

    Please listen again

     

    Enjoying tapas and studying the score :)

     

    There are distinct timbral as well as pitch differences between them :)

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I bought a TAD DA-1000 DAC some weeks ago but considering the enthusiastic review of Chris, I could wonder when it was not throwing money away even when I am very impressed by the TAD's performance also on 16/44.1!

     

    Indeed DACs are likely the most frustrating matter for HiFi amateurs as every day comes with a new killer model in every segment of the market. I add to the list of the models mentioned in some precedent posts: NAGRA HD DAC, Soulution Audio 560 DAC Gryphon Kalliope...

    In any case, the difficulty is to test all these models at home, which is the logical way before deciding such an investment...

     

    Even so, any choice bears risk and except being very rich or a HiFi reviewer, the best solution would be to stop reading anything about DACs for a moment not to be mentally depressive :)

     

    Beyond this general consideration, I am interested like other readers to have the opinion/advice of Chris about a direct connexion between the DAC and the final Amplifier. I use such a direct link and improved with no doubt the final result (but had a modest preamp).

     

    The last point relates to the decision not to implement any USB HD input on the BA due to noises it would circulate or create. I observe the fact that USB outputs are present not only on computers but also on music servers that limit noise (near to zero for the best performers). Furthermore USB cables are for some now very well performing.

    1 week ago I would not have been so skeptical since I found out a jewel. I was really disappointed with the new WIREWORLD PLATINUM cable (the same that the one used by Chris in this review) plugged into my AURENDER (S 10) and the TAD DAC. A veil remained (more) perceptible when compared with the coaxial cable.

    Fortunately my HiFi vendor informed me on the new Absolue Créations USB-TIM cable and offered me to test it. With my system, it sounds great, indeed better than with the coax. Transparency is at least equal (no more veil) and low frequencies are just magnified. I did not unplug this new ecstatic cable ;) No frustration either as I paid only the difference!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yes, a full Sonore Signature Series Rendu review is on the way.

    Excellent!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Excellent review! Very nice to read and hear your comments using the Reference DAC overall and especially with specific music examples. It's fun to read when something really is a great step forward. Your review inspired me to look into this dac further and consider a purchase.

    I was surprised to note there was no caps v3 used as a source. Can anyone comment who's tried this dac with a caps v3 server?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This implies that we should only be buying music in the PCM format going forward. Good to know. Thanks to Chris for the courage it took to publish this review.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I just swapped out the RS for a pair of Devialet 400 monos (for review) :~)

     

    Very different all around.

     

    Chris,

     

    As you open the door for out of main topic posts, I cannot refrain...

     

    Not only to say I am very interested in reading your conclusions to come.

     

    While you are being testing these skilled "full-services" integrated devices, on top of the cream, with an external as internal design (near...) to dye for, may I suggest you to pair them with the LEEDH V2 - 2+1 loudspeakers system and cables that also I am sure will make a tremendous job with the BA RS.

     

    Let's hope you will use hyperlatives :)

     

    PS: I have no stake or relationship with any of these manufacturers.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris-

    Thank you for the review. As you know, TAS wrote almost the exact things you've written. I look forward to hearing the DAC.

     

    I've read your work for years and have been impressed by your approach, honesty and integrity. It's clear that you love what you do and you've had the courage to create a business out of what you love.

     

    I'm constantly amazed by the arrogance of commenters, and enjoy watching how you manage yourself in response.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris-

    Thank you for the review. As you know, TAS wrote almost the exact things you've written. I look forward to hearing the DAC.

     

    I've read your work for years and have been impressed by your approach, honesty and integrity. It's clear that you love what you do and you've had the courage to create a business out of what you love.

     

    I'm constantly amazed by the arrogance of commenters, and enjoy watching how you manage yourself in response.

    Hi totdoc - Thank you so much for the kind words. It feels great that you, and hopefully others, understand my approach and appreciate my perspective.

     

    It surprises me that people jump all over very positive reviews but thank the negative reviewer for being "honest." Fortunately an overwhelming percentage of the CA Community is a cut above the rest when it comes to intelligence, respect, and professionalism. The CA Community is what keeps my job the best job in the world.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Originally Posted by thotdoc.

     

    Chris

     

    I've read your work for years and have been impressed by your approach, honesty and integrity. It's clear that you love what you do and you've had the courage to create a business out of what you love.

     

     

    +1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Seems like there's always a new DAC that kills everything the reviewer has ever heard. And not just on CA. I figure by now we should be able to buy a DAC that sounds ten times better than hearing the live event :)

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Certainly an enthusiastic review, I guess when you say "most remarkable sounding product I've ever reviewed" you mean you like it. The review does raise some questions.

     

    First "There's no chip a manufacture can purchase and implement that comes close to replicating 'Berkeley's' custom filtering technology". Filters are software based on well established math that goes back many decades. Lets assume their software is really that unique. A chip manufacture can afford fleets of PhDs to design filters. The Berkeley guys don't operate in a vacuum. They took the same courses in school as everyone else, they read the same journals, they talk to the same component vendors and they attend the same conferences. If what they did is that special, its a good bet it will be reverse engineered. If they patent it, the "secret" is out, patents require disclosure.

     

     

    "A DAC that can make standard resolution (16/44.1) material sound as good as high resolution is a true game changer" I guess this should finally answer the "can people tell the difference between standard cd and hi rez", and the answer is they can't.

     

    "the cost of the parts ended up being 40x greater than parts used in the Alpha DAC Series 2 or the Alpha USB" You can't be saying their COG is 40x their previous product, that would mean to keep the same hardware gross margins their new dac would have to sell for $200,000. Did they tell you which parts cost 40x?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Personally, I don't care whether their parts costs $.25.

    It's the result that matters.

    Too much intellectualizing takes place when a reviewer says an item is a "game changer" or something similar, when the cost of the product is deemed very high, and far too often when the poster hasn't heard the product.

    I own the DAC. It's amazing.

    And if a manufacturer is really making too much of a profit on their product, then I'm sure plenty of other Phd's will figure out how to deliver the same product (or better) at a lower price.

    Let's see how quickly that happens.

    Joel

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Personally, I don't care whether their parts costs $.25.

    It's the result that matters.

    Too much intellectualizing takes place when a reviewer says an item is a "game changer" or something similar, when the cost of the product is deemed very high, and far too often when the poster hasn't heard the product.

    I own the DAC. It's amazing.

    And if a manufacturer is really making too much of a profit on their product, then I'm sure plenty of other Phd's will figure out how to deliver the same product (or better) at a lower price.

    Let's see how quickly that happens.

    Joel

     

    I am happy you and Chris are enjoying it. I am sure it is a remarkably good/great product.

     

    My issue is when a reviewer, even Chris makes a comment like:

     

    "Chalk this magic up to the Alpha DAC RS and its brilliant designer Michael "Pflash" Pflaumer and the rest of the 'Berkeley' team who took part in creating the best DAC on the market"

     

    Best DAC on the market????

     

    I think I will just have to take that one with a grain of salt. This is when us cynics have issues with reviews.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Priaptor,

    I'm not trying to pick an argument here. Really.

    But I'm curious.

    What's provocative about someone saying that an item is the best on the market?

    No one can believe anything is the best in the market in our hobby?

    Joel

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Priaptor,

    I'm not trying to pick an argument here. Really.

    But I'm curious.

    What's provocative about someone saying that an item is the best on the market?

    No one can believe anything is the best in the market in our hobby?

    Joel

     

    Ehhh because it's an absurd statement.

     

    If someone wants to limit "best" to their own experience or sphere no issue but to make a blanket statement that it's "the best on the market" destroys any credibility.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well, it's a review and by that measure is by its' nature "only" Chris' opinion. So technically you are right, but to call the statement absurd because it isn't "fact" is also absurd.

     

    Chris has credibility based on his past and continuing work. He doesn't call everything he reviews a "game changer" or "best ever". He's reviewed some of the best DACs on the market very favorably. Including some that are much more pricey than this one. So when he says this one is the "best" he's heard the statement has some innate credibility.

     

    Sorry if his style bothers you. Learn to relax a bit and read it in its' larger context and life will have one less annoyance for you:)

     

    Ehhh because it's an absurd statement.

     

    If someone wants to limit "best" to their own experience or sphere no issue but to make a blanket statement that it's "the best on the market" destroys any credibility.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well, it's a review and by that measure is by its' nature "only" Chris' opinion. So technically you are right, but to call the statement absurd because it isn't "fact" is also absurd.

     

    Chris has credibility based on his past and continuing work. He doesn't call everything he reviews a "game changer" or "best ever". He's reviewed some of the best DACs on the market very favorably. Including some that are much more pricey than this one. So when he says this one is the "best" he's heard the statement has some innate credibility.

     

    Sorry if his style bothers you. Learn to relax a bit and read it in its' larger context and life will have one less annoyance for you:)

     

    I am relaxed just pointing out, like others, that when a comment like that is made it mitigates the legitimacy of the review, at least IMO.

     

    Man you guys need to unplug and stop praying at the Chris altar. Yeah I like Chris and for the most part enjoy reading his reviews and take on the industry BUT I also have no issue pointing out things that are over the top when I read them.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'd suggest the skeptics give a read through or two with the interview with Michael Ritter in the Absolute Sound. Then, I'd suggest you go listen to a DAC2x, which might be easier to find, and ponder the idea that the RS exceeds it in a number of areas. Now, I've spent some time with the DAC2x, in the process of winnowing out high end DACs of a certain price class, ultimately ending up with a TotalDAC-D1 Dual, which I use with a Mutec MC3-Plus and Rubidium clock (which takes the TotalDAC up another notch or two, as it does most DACs). Frankly, though I've been very happy with the TotalDAC, I also have an Alpha USB and a BADA (which I still use in a secondary system), and given what I'm reading, I'm going to be checking out the RS if Music Lovers, the local Berkeley Audio dealer, gets them in. you just never know.... so cut Chris some slack, and go listen to the Berkeley RS before you dismiss his inputs.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Certainly an enthusiastic review, I guess when you say "most remarkable sounding product I've ever reviewed" you mean you like it. The review does raise some questions.

     

    First "There's no chip a manufacture can purchase and implement that comes close to replicating 'Berkeley's' custom filtering technology". Filters are software based on well established math that goes back many decades. Lets assume their software is really that unique. A chip manufacture can afford fleets of PhDs to design filters. The Berkeley guys don't operate in a vacuum. They took the same courses in school as everyone else, they read the same journals, they talk to the same component vendors and they attend the same conferences. If what they did is that special, its a good bet it will be reverse engineered. If they patent it, the "secret" is out, patents require disclosure.

     

     

    "A DAC that can make standard resolution (16/44.1) material sound as good as high resolution is a true game changer" I guess this should finally answer the "can people tell the difference between standard cd and hi rez", and the answer is they can't.

     

    "the cost of the parts ended up being 40x greater than parts used in the Alpha DAC Series 2 or the Alpha USB" You can't be saying their COG is 40x their previous product, that would mean to keep the same hardware gross margins their new dac would have to sell for $200,000. Did they tell you which parts cost 40x?

     

    +1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Certainly an enthusiastic review, I guess when you say "most remarkable sounding product I've ever reviewed" you mean you like it. The review does raise some questions.

     

    First "There's no chip a manufacture can purchase and implement that comes close to replicating 'Berkeley's' custom filtering technology". Filters are software based on well established math that goes back many decades. Lets assume their software is really that unique. A chip manufacture can afford fleets of PhDs to design filters. The Berkeley guys don't operate in a vacuum. They took the same courses in school as everyone else, they read the same journals, they talk to the same component vendors and they attend the same conferences. If what they did is that special, its a good bet it will be reverse engineered. If they patent it, the "secret" is out, patents require disclosure.

     

     

    "A DAC that can make standard resolution (16/44.1) material sound as good as high resolution is a true game changer" I guess this should finally answer the "can people tell the difference between standard cd and hi rez", and the answer is they can't.

     

    "the cost of the parts ended up being 40x greater than parts used in the Alpha DAC Series 2 or the Alpha USB" You can't be saying their COG is 40x their previous product, that would mean to keep the same hardware gross margins their new dac would have to sell for $200,000. Did they tell you which parts cost 40x?

     

    +1. As one of my more hard nosed engineering friends likes to say, true breakthroughs in audio are few and far between. Most quantum leaps forward relate to advertising and hype. That is not to say that the dac is not killer and Chris was/is bowled over. Again, Chris, what was your previous digital frame of reference?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'd suggest the skeptics give a read through or two with the interview with Michael Ritter in the Absolute Sound. Then, I'd suggest you go listen to a DAC2x, which might be easier to find, and ponder the idea that the RS exceeds it in a number of areas. Now, I've spent some time with the DAC2x, in the process of winnowing out high end DACs of a certain price class, ultimately ending up with a TotalDAC-D1 Dual, which I use with a Mutec MC3-Plus and Rubidium clock (which takes the TotalDAC up another notch or two, as it does most DACs). Frankly, though I've been very happy with the TotalDAC, I also have an Alpha USB and a BADA (which I still use in a secondary system), and given what I'm reading, I'm going to be checking out the RS if Music Lovers, the local Berkeley Audio dealer, gets them in. you just never know.... so cut Chris some slack, and go listen to the Berkeley RS before you dismiss his inputs.

     

    Jon, the same can be said for you. Nobody here has heard even most Dacs out there and I can tell you the Trinity people are going crazy over that (mechanical oversampling and all that)...so without hearing it in the same setup, who knows. Phasure people like Mani love their Dac too (Phasure NOS1a). Miska with his DSD algorithms and his DSC-1 DSD Dac running with HQ Player. I have heard the dac2x and the Totaldac and guess what, I think the Lampizator 7 has better sonics! That is to my ears.

     

    When you play in the very high end, it's better to say...ONE of the best out there and stay away from absolutes. And I like Chris a lot, so would not give him grief at all. He is a great guy. That said, people should be free to crtitique certain aspects of his review with no ill-intent in mind. Me, I take Chris's enthusiam as just that. He thinks the Dac sounds great and it's one of the best out there, the best in his living room ever. I can live with that.

     

    Here is MY absolute though (LoL...breaking my own edict) no DSD to PCM conversion can sound as good as DSD done right! That is my story and I's sticking to it! Hehehe

     

    One final point...as Agear also says, the Transport is half the battle, so Dac in isolation is futility.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Jon, the same can be said for you. Nobody here has heard even most Dacs out there and I can tell you the Trinity people are going crazy over that (mechanical oversampling and all that)...so without hearing it in the same setup, who knows. Phasure people like Mani love their Dac too (Phasure NOS1a). Miska with his DSD algorithms and his DSC-1 DSD Dac running with HQ Player. I have heard the dac2x and the Totaldac and guess what, I think the Lampizator 7 has better sonics! That is to my ears.

     

    When you play in the very high end, it's better to say...ONE of the best out there and stay away from absolutes. And I like Chris a lot, so would not give him grief at all. He is a great guy. That said, people should be free to crtitique certain aspects of his review with no ill-intent in mind. Me, I take Chris's enthusiam as just that. He thinks the Dac sounds great and it's one of the best out there, the best in his living room ever. I can live with that.

     

    Here is MY absolute though (LoL...breaking my own edict) no DSD to PCM conversion can sound as good as DSD done right! That is my story and I's sticking to it! Hehehe

     

    One final point...as Agear also says, the Transport is half the battle, so Dac in isolation is futility.

     

    EXACTLY. I agree. While I have never met Chris, all my interactions with him would lead me to agree that he seems like a great guy and I enjoy his writings and he in addition to a few others have enabled me to reach a level I never would have reached regarding digital which I am ever greatful. All I was doing was just critiquing something I found over the top regarding this review. I am not the first and surely won't be the last to raise the issue of reviewers that make these kind of comments mitigating, at least in some readers minds (in this case mine), the veracity of the review in question.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Certainly an enthusiastic review, I guess when you say "most remarkable sounding product I've ever reviewed" you mean you like it. The review does raise some questions.

     

    First "There's no chip a manufacture can purchase and implement that comes close to replicating 'Berkeley's' custom filtering technology". Filters are software based on well established math that goes back many decades. Lets assume their software is really that unique. A chip manufacture can afford fleets of PhDs to design filters. The Berkeley guys don't operate in a vacuum. They took the same courses in school as everyone else, they read the same journals, they talk to the same component vendors and they attend the same conferences. If what they did is that special, its a good bet it will be reverse engineered. If they patent it, the "secret" is out, patents require disclosure.

     

     

    "A DAC that can make standard resolution (16/44.1) material sound as good as high resolution is a true game changer" I guess this should finally answer the "can people tell the difference between standard cd and hi rez", and the answer is they can't.

     

    "the cost of the parts ended up being 40x greater than parts used in the Alpha DAC Series 2 or the Alpha USB" You can't be saying their COG is 40x their previous product, that would mean to keep the same hardware gross margins their new dac would have to sell for $200,000. Did they tell you which parts cost 40x?

     

    -1. Just pedantic nitpicking trying to find something, anything, to have a knock against Chris' review. The questions you raise can be raised against any product that raises the bar in any industry. Why state the obvious ?

     

    All I was doing was just critiquing something I found over the top regarding this review. I am not the first and surely won't be the last to raise the issue of reviewers that make these kind of comments mitigating, at least in some readers minds (in this case mine), the veracity of the review in question.

     

    I will repeat myself, just pedantic nitpicking trying to find something, anything, to have a knock against Chris' review. Think about the absurdity of this, a reviewer is not allowed to enthusiastically say a product is the best he has ever heard. Its not like Chris has form on this and does it all the time. This is the most positive review he has ever given and he obviously feels passionate about this product.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Guest
    This is now closed for further comments




×
×
  • Create New...