Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile
    The Computer Audiophile

    Pono or Oh No - An Interview With Neil Young

    thumb.jpg

    Sitting in an oversized bulbous chair outside the interview room waiting for my turn to speak with Neil Young was surreal. I didn't grow up a big fan of Neil. I was introduced to his music through my favorite band Pearl Jam. PJ frequently plays Rockin' In The Free World as an encore at its shows. In addition, Eddie Vedder of Pearl Jam refers to Mr. Young as Uncle Neil. According to Eddie, Neil has provided much needed guidance to the band from the mid-nineties monstrous successes to the suicide of Nirvana's Kurt Cobain and the band's decision to take a step back from the limelight. As I sat in the nice Austin breeze, several thoughts went through my head. I was expecting Neil to be tired of answering questions and possibly annoyed that a guy from Computer Audiophile was about to interview this vinyl loving rockstar. Let's face it, I'm no Ben Fong-Torres. Was I going to turn into Chris Farley interviewing Paul McCartney on Saturday Night Live? What if I said, "Remember when you were with Buffalo Springfield, that was awesome." My mind was spiraling out of control with endless possibilities. Fortunately my questions for Neil were on my iPhone and my Nagra ARES-MII recorder was in hand. All I had to do was ask the questions and listen to the answers. Then, Rick from Warner Brothers said, "Chris, you're up."[PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

     

    Chris Connaker: This is pretty damn cool for me Neil.

     

    Neil Young: Good.

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

    CC: You guys just hit $2 Million on the Kickstarter campaign. Are you surprised?

     

    NY: You know, I'm happy but I'm not surprised that people are reacting like they are. That's why I did this. I knew people wanted it. I wanted it. Musicians wanted it. And we're very grateful. But we're not surprised.

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

    CC: Computer Audiophile reader Bruce F. says hello.

     

    NY: Oh great, Bruce.

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

    CC: Are you still using the Pacific Microsonics Model II?

     

    NY: Ah, for some things. There are better ones now. Yeah it's a great one. The jury is out, but there are a few other things on the horizon which is good. But we still use it.

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

    CC: The entire Computer Audiophile community would like nothing better than to see Pono turn into the next Beats, but with high quality. Beats are everywhere. it would be great to see Pono everywhere. What's your goal with Pono?

     

    NY: The goal is to make people aware that there's another place to go. To bring freedom of choice to the audio experience that's been missing for twenty years. That's very unAmerican.

     

    CC: Says the Canadian.

     

    NY: Yeah, yeah. It's unworldly. We can't have no freedom. You can't be limited. You can't be. Just like we shouldn't be limited to one fuel for our cars, we shouldn't be limited to one type of music for our ears. Or one type of food for our mouths.

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

    CC: What would it take for you to say, "I've succeeded with Pono?"

     

    NY: If I succeed with Pono it might not be that Pono makes millions of dollars. It may be that we made out and we were able to be a company. Maybe we just survived because someone much bigger than us cam along with million and millions of dollars and out-spent us and out-did us and out-everythinged us and did what we did and brought this to the world in a way that we couldn't. Although I think we can. It's just in my history nobody has been interested. I know when they see success they become interested in how they can monetize it. It's a win-win for music and audio to find out what's missing today. If Pono does that it's a huge victory. Were on our way to doing that. You can see something is happening. I'm sure that people in the audio community are encouraged to see the reaction of the people on the street. That's what we've always been about. Were not an audiophile company. We are about bringing the quality to the people the way it used to be. In other words we made analog records that became vinyl and that was the quality we made in the studio then it went to the people. We're not doing anything new. All we're doing is saying, in the studio today make your digital music in whatever resolution you want to make it at. We're going to say what it is on our player you'll know. It will be there somewhere. People will learn when they listen to things. When it sounds great they'll get curious. They'll want to know what it is. Some of them may some of the may not. They'll choose to take a look. A go, look at that, I love this, and it's 192. It's one of three things I have that are 192. All the others are lower res, some are 48, some are 96. They may, in their mind, go "oh shit" this is what it sounds like at 48, really great. I wonder what it would have sounded like at 192. The awareness of those differences and the palette musicians have to play with will change. Producers will now be able to use resolution as an effect. It can be super clear if you want that. Or, it can be dull if you don't want that. Even within one recording you can go from low res to high res. You can use it as a tool. You can use it creatively. You can turn it on and off. The whole recording will have to be presented at it's highest resolution. But if the chorus and the hook are at 192, and the rest of the song is at 44.1 or 48, something compatible, then it's mixed at 192. The source was low res, the chorus was super high res, some of the vocals are really high res, some are dull. It's a new way to play. A whole new thing. That kind of creativity in the studio is possibly a new tool for the hip hop and rap community. It's not one of the things they've done. They are very creative and incredibly poetic in their way, which I appreciate. Yet, guys like me can do what we do. Create things the way we create them. Whatever we do in the studio, we finish, we can hand it in to Pono and it's going to sound exactly like what we did. Through the best player you can get. You may be able to make some improvements to our player, maybe not in our size. We really got a great sound. It's an odd shaped player because of what's in it. We had to make some things big to make those earphones sound good. There's a reason for everything. It's not just because we thought it was cool. Although we do think it's cool. We think it stands for something. That's who we are. That's what we do. We're not a format. We are anti-format. We don't want the musicians to ever have a format again. Formats are for computer companies.

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

    CC: I'd rather listen to Pearl Jam on an AM radio than listen to Scottish nose whistle at 24/192. Content is king. Can Pono get the record labels to completely open their vaults?

     

    NY: Yes. Have you seen the Pearl Jam (Kickstarter PonoPlayer signed edition) offering, it's blowing through the roof.

     

    CC: I bought it yesterday the second I saw it. It's all sold out.

     

    NY: They sold out?

     

    CC: Yeah.

     

    NY: I figured it would. They were the second or third one to sell out. The other ones did because I was on them and I have a lot of my fans going to the site. That makes sense. Pearl Jam selling out is great. There are other ones on the way. It's just a matter of time. We keep adding more artists. James Taylor (Kickstarter PonoPlayer signed edition) came out today.

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

    CC: Numbers such as sample rate and bit depth are only part of the equation. The people behind the recordings are more important. Will there be a Pono certification or guarantee or Mastered for Pono type thing to designate tracks that are of pono quality.

     

    NY: No. Pono is Pono. You make what you make. When we say it's Pono that means we are bringing you the closest thing to the master, if it's not the master, if it's not the native resolution it's the closet thing to it that was mastered. Then were asking why the hell didn't they master the native resolution. If you buy what it is they supplied, and there's a higher resolution, and we're after them to master it, and they master it, you get it. You don't have to pay for it. You've already bought the best it can be. The best it can be is what we're gong to give you. You just have to download it again in our store. You'll get notified in our little newspaper, these are the new things that got upgraded. You bought it, you can believe if we can we'll upgrade it if it's not it's high as it ever can go. A lot of our stuff will be as high as it will ever get. A lot of people recorded at low res in the last little bit of time. Before that it was different. It's only recently people gave up. There's a window of that. There's nothing we can do about that. We can't put people down for that. We'll play whatever it was they were able to do. They created it. That's what Pono is. It's not about mastered for Pono. It's mastered. Period.

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

    CC: Will Pono have an effect on the Loudness Wars or encourage less dynamic range compression.

     

    NY: (Long pause) Well, I don't know. It could. To me dynamic range is king. The music decides how compressed it is. If you make a mix and you make the mix, not mastering, in the mix, that's where you do the compression. You compress certain instruments as an effect. That's really all you want. You want that shit to pump so that's what you compress. Why compress what comes and goes? You don't have to make that decision in mastering. The artist can make the decision. If they want something that pumps and grooves all the way through like ah, what the hell is the name, it's a great great band, two guys, two guys (The Black Keys -CC), Yeah, they are great. They use a lot of compression in their mixing. They record at like 48. I've noticed what they do. They'll have more to play with. They can still have that sound and have it be a 192 master with just like one area of the song, maybe the hook, or one instrument be 192, just fucking, what the hell is that! The mix is made up of these two things (sample rates). You get source stuff that is 48k, it's not going to be higher than 48k unless you put acoustic echo on it and that echo will be at 192k. Using resolution as an effect is one of the offshoots of Pono. That's one of the creative tools that people like the Black Keys, Kanye West, Eminem, Jay Z, LIl' Wayne, can use. They are very creative, let them go, let them have whatever they want we just give them more.

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

    CC: How will PonoMusic, the Pono online store, be different from sites like HDtracks, or will it be different?

     

    NY: I don't know what the HDtracks store is like. The Pono Store will be the Pono Store. We sell stuff that is Pono. It's the best that's available. Period.

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

    CC: Will you have any exclusive Pono releases?

     

    NY: It depends. If we pay to have it mastered it may be ours for a while but there's no reason to keep it. It should be everybody's. If we pay to master it we'll want to have it for awhile so we can say look what we did then everybody can have it we don't care. It's about music it's not about owning it. We don't want to own somebody's master or the rights to sell it, but it would be nice to have a little windows if we made it available.

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

    CC: Will Pono address the provenance issue that's going on right now, as an example one of your recordings Le Noise was released at 24/96 but the material used to create that was 44.1 or 48k, will Pono provide details of up sampled albums?

     

    NY: Everything that is on Pono will be listed as exactly what it is. I don't know about the DVD of Le Noise. I'm trying to think what that was. Maybe that was up sampled because of the ... let's see is there anything on there … I think it's at 48 … I though it was high res, I wasn't focused on that part when I made it. That was Daniel Lanois who did that, they were cool but they didn't take it to the max which I thought they would. They had a board from Canada, I don't know what the hell it's called, like a Xanax or something, something I've never seen before. A very mellow board a Xanax (Neil laughs). Anyway, it was a 48k board and I didn't know that but I think it may have been at 96 on the DVD because it had videos. But there wouldn't be a Blu-ray because there was no reason. The DVD standard may have been 96k, but if they doubled it up that was wrong. That shouldn't have happened. It doesn't sound worse.

     

     

    CC: I believe Chrome Dreams II has an issue (interrupted by Rick from Warner Brothers, the interview time is over).

     

    NY: What do you believe about Chrome Dreams?

     

    CC: I believe it was the same situation as Le Noise, people have posted graphs online and it looked up sampled.

     

    NY: I think we did that at our studio, I know where I recorded it. I'll ask Niko Bolas about that. I'd be surprised if that was the case. There may have been some of the tracks at a certain level so we used the certain level for everything. Pono will be transparent. There will be a page. You'll be able to read what it is. We can tell just like they can tell. All you have to do is look at it. If someone says what it is when they give it to us we'll check it. Those things matter and there's no reason why we can't have that.

     

    CC: That's great, Computer Audiophile readers are really looking for that stuff.

     

    NY: Good that's important stuff. I agree with them that it's important. Pono is a chance to buy material and use it in whatever way they want to play it back. We think our player is pretty damn good, I'm mean look who made it. It's really good and you can take it with you and plug it into anything. The problem with some of the things we're going to encounter, if you have a new Ford or Chevy or something like that, you're going to have that Microsoft shit in there and it's going to downgrade whatever we put into it. We'll have to work through that.

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

    CC: Thanks Neil, it was a pleasure.

    NY: Thanks.

     

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

    Pono or Oh No

     

    March 11, 2014, Neil Young announced PonoMusic and the PonoPlayer at South by Southwest. In addition Pono, the company, launched a Kickstarter campaign seeking $800,000. Based on the amount of press and the amount of money raised thus far, $4.1 Million, I think Pono is off to a great start. At the Saint Cecelia hotel before the interview I had an opportunity to listen to the PonoPlayer. The sound was very good coming through the TAD CR1 loudspeakers and Ayre Acoustics integrated amplifier. The selection of wonderfully mastered music didn't hurt :~) The PonoPlayer connected to this Ayre / TAD system is the only PonoPlayer in the world designed by Ayre Acoustics. In fact, the player was in a little black box that accepted digital output from the yellow PonoPlayer (a feature not planned for the final design). This black box was design by Ayre shortly before the show. There wasn't enough time to assemble an additional player. Thus, all listening impressions of the PonoPlayer done through headphones are now obsolete. The PonoPlayers available for headphone playback were the old Meridian design that will not make it to production.

     

     

    Like every product brought to market, Pono has its share of fans and detractors. I was initially surprised by the comments of a few skeptics that railed against Pono for its lack of specifics about the PonoPlayer and the PonoMusic Store, and its Kickstarter campaign. In addition, a few people just had to go on record as the first folks to predict Pono's demise. The surprising part was this negativity emanated from some in the audiophile community. Nobody commenting had heard a single song on the Ayre Acoustics designed PonoPlayer, yet some were stating how Joe Sixpack will never tell the difference between Pono and a lossy iTunes track. Give Pono room to breathe people. Pono is something many audiophiles have wanted for decades. It's a movement with the ability to bring awareness of good sound quality to the masses. Plus, all ships rise with the tide. If Pono succeeds, sites like HDtracks and Acoustic Sounds will grow exponentially. High end manufacturers will benefit from an influx of new customers seeking better sound quality at home, in the office, or in the car. Imagine the traffic in David Wasserman's Stereo Exchange at 627 Broadway in New York City when he places a Pono banner in the front window. People who saw Neil Young's CNBC interview from South by Southwest may waltz through the door to see what Pono is all about. The opportunity to give this industry a shot in the arm is ripe. There are no losers if Pono succeeds.

     

     

    Setting my rose colored glasses down for a moment, I also see the uphill battle ahead for Pono, good sound quality, and the high end industry as a whole. Convenience always trumps quality for the masses. Pono must deliver on both quality and convenience to succeed. What happens when people give Pono a listen and don't hear a difference between it and their iPhone with lossy AAC files? Who knows. But, these may be the same people selecting $330 Beats headphones over a pair of cheaper and better Sennheisers at the Apple Store just because the color is white or red or different. People purchase products for any number of reasons. Maybe Pono can get in the door thanks to Neil Young and his fellow rockstars' endorsements. Would the Beats company be what it is today without celebrities? Not a chance. Pono also has to get ready for the unsatisfied customers who purchase clearly upsampled albums and the onslaught of Internet chatter that follows. No matter what Neil says about transparency and provenance and letting the customers know what they are getting, upsampled material will sneak through to the PonoMusic Store. In addition to 44.1 kHz albums masquerading as 96 kHz albums, Pono faces the same pressure as all high resolution music retailers when it comes to price. It remains to be seen if the higher prices of higher sample rate content will scare off the masses.

     

     

    I want Pono to succeed. Sure, this is un-journalistic but if Pono succeeds we all win. What's not to like about more good music and success for manufacturers producing playback devices and all the accessories? What's not to like about more choices for consumers? What's not to like about more competition among online music retailers? Pono has the potential to bring in the tide and lift all boats still floating.

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

    photo-800px.JPG

     

    6Y5A2869-900px.jpg

     

    6Y5A2865-900px.jpg

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Le Noise was originally recorded at 48khz 24bit, Chris Bellman, the mastering engineer, re-recorded the stream at 96khz 24 bit for the DVD and Blu-ray video release. Ordinary People from Chrome Dreams II was recorded in the late 80's at 48khz 24 bit digitally, the rest of the album was recorded on analog tape in 2006/2007.

     

    Ah. Am starting to realize that mastering is a bit like the n-body problem. Didn't realize there would be so many different recording types and constraints, for a given album.

     

    Thanks for sharing this.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I also find it is highly unlikely a producer will use different sample rates as an effect - it is too subtle. There are tons of other plugins to use for shaping sound. And if they do, the customer will never know as the end file will be high res, you wouldn't know if they used 16/44 in some part.

     

    Also I think most modern studios will benefit greatly if use 24/88, but I don't see them migrating to 24/176 or 24/192. Commercial music uses tons of tracks and the HD space, load times and backup is not worth it for ultra-sonics and slight digital filter improvements. 24/88 should be very good already.

     

    Q: Are you a good businessman?

    A: No. But I'm not in charge of the business. I'm just the mascot — the hood ornament.

    ==> Brilliant! :D

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I also find it is highly unlikely a producer will use different sample rates as an effect - it is too subtle. There are tons of other plugins to use for shaping sound. And if they do, the customer will never know as the end file will be high res, you wouldn't know if they used 16/44 in some part.

     

    To me this sounds like a typical studio nut's vision and I like Mr. Young for that. Makes me think of my first encounter with the amazing GRM Tools plugins in 1995 or -96 when my colleague said ‘I wish this was a room where I can move inside and control the parameters that way.’ Today, we are very slowly getting there.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have looked at the many DAPs (digital audio player) out there, and have not been excited about any of the affordable ones. Some of the other specialty (hi-rez) DAPs out there can go for $800-2500 (well the astel and kern will supposedly do DSD portably, and has WiFi). I think the Pono DAP competes well at the iPod price point, and has 128 gig, with half of it on a micro SD card, so its possible to bring more with you if you need. It also will do the hi-rez, which is pretty much anti-iTunes Store mentality. I might be an Apple fanboy, but I don't buy music from the iTunes store. I personally can wait to order the CD and rip it to ALAC, or buy the download from Linn or HDTracks.

     

    I ordered the Norah Jones signed chrome one. It will replace an aging iPod Touch. I can play games on the iPhone instead.

     

    After following digital music for many years, I think we are seeing an uptick in the interest in lossless files and higher resolutions. As we are in vinyl.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    As has been said, if they allow feedback on the site, it should enable us to comment on SQ and Volume compression of the files. I think that would put some market pressure on labels to produce better sounding albums.

     

    Qobuz already allows this.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I was half joking before, but I noticed in the Audiostream article that the Pono player had two Stones songs on the display. As far as I know the ABKCO tapes were only transferred to DSD and PCM versions were transcoded from DSD. To me that, wouldn't be cool. Was he only using this for demo purposes? Did Neil actually do new transfers? I've read that Jody Klein doesn't let the master tapes out of his sight.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Pono is a real shot in the arm for the music biz on so many levels! In the pre digital days when vinyl ruled, everyone got the same product, that is a vinyl album. To make it sound awesome, you'd get a high quality hifi system, the album would keep sounding better the better your system got. Nowadays, the fragmentation is unbelievable in comparison with so many different formats and bit rates is it any wonder audiophiles are confused! I hope Pono returns us to the old model of buying an album once and for that you get the highest available sound!

     

    I also believe that Pono is more about the music store than the player. The player will always be fluid like all technology. It wont stop with the first gen player, it will keep evolving with upgrades and maybe a choice between different models at various price points, some even aimed solely for home use in your big system etc. This will happen if the music store succeeds!

     

    They should market this along the lines of 'to get awesome sound, you need Pono Music Files for your chosen playback device (ie, it will work with anything). To get even better sound than that, the best available, you need Pono Music played back through our Pono Player'!

     

    i wish everyone associated with this project the best of success and of course kudos must go to the one and only Mr Neil Young, long may he run!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I was half joking before, but I noticed in the Audiostream article that the Pono player had two Stones songs on the display. As far as I know the ABKCO tapes were only transferred to DSD and PCM versions were transcoded from DSD. To me that, wouldn't be cool. Was he only using this for demo purposes? Did Neil actually do new transfers? I've read that Jody Klein doesn't let the master tapes out of his sight.

     

    Well, I think you should prepare yourself to be disappointed. If Pono isn't selling DSD, they are going to get the "best available" file out there. In this case that is going to be the hires PCM. Not much of a problem for me, as the hi-res of these masters sounds great. As does the Redbook, BTW. NY made it very clear to Chris that there weren't going to be Pono SQ standards, and they weren't about telling artists and producers how to record and master.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Off topic comments removed. -Editor

     

    I also believe that Pono is more about the music store than the player. The player will always be fluid like all technology. It wont stop with the first gen player, it will keep evolving with upgrades and maybe a choice between different models at various price points, some even aimed solely for home use in your big system etc. This will happen if the music store succeeds!

     

    They should market this along the lines of 'to get awesome sound, you need Pono Music Files for your chosen playback device (ie, it will work with anything). To get even better sound than that, the best available, you need Pono Music played back through our Pono Player'!

     

    i wish everyone associated with this project the best of success and of course kudos must go to the one and only Mr Neil Young, long may he run!

     

    I agree and I too wish Neil Young and Pono the best of luck. Their success I believe means more exposure to high-resolution downloads for the masses and hopefully more great sounding music for us.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Teresa,

    That was an interesting slice of history. Thank you for bringing back the memories. (And, in some cases, the nightmares...) :)

     

    ... audiophile cassettes. ...

     

    Surely an oxymoron? :)

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Very well written article questioning the need for 192/24 in Pono. Most of his sources have been discussed around here before, but he puts it all together nicely.

     

    Just because it is "well written" and "put together nicely" does not make it true. Of course the originators of MP# and AAC are going to argue against the need for anything better. And it has already been shown that Monty's arguments miss the point of high-res.

     

    Besides, Chris has already stipulated that this thread not diverge down the path towards arguing the relevance of file resolution.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well, I think you should prepare yourself to be disappointed. If Pono isn't selling DSD, they are going to get the "best available" file out there. In this case that is going to be the hires PCM. Not much of a problem for me, as the hi-res of these masters sounds great. As does the Redbook, BTW. NY made it very clear to Chris that there weren't going to be Pono SQ standards, and they weren't about telling artists and producers how to record and master.

     

    I listened to Neil talking about not using vinyl masters and safety copies etc. Now he seems to be saying he'll sell best available. HDTracks is already doing this and it's a disappointment. Now I wonder what Pono will do differently in that regard if anything?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just because it is "well written" and "put together nicely" does not make it true. Of course the originators of MP# and AAC are going to argue against the need for anything better. And it has already been shown that Monty's arguments miss the point of high-res.

     

    They are saying that better than 44.1/16 is not needed, not that MP3 and AAC are sufficient. Monty's arguments are based on established science and testing. He is clearly an expert in the field. Where has it "been shown" (as in proven?) that his arguments miss "the point of high-res" unless the point is to sell, sell, sell?

     

    Besides, Chris has already stipulated that this thread not diverge down the path towards arguing the relevance of file resolution.

     

    The article mentions Pono right in the title. How is that not relevant? Because you and Chris disagree with the author? If we are going to discuss Pono, how can we not talk about the merits of hi-res audio?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    They are saying that better than 44.1/16 is not needed, not that MP3 and AAC are sufficient. Monty's arguments are based on established science and testing. He is clearly an expert in the field. Where has it "been shown" (as in proven?) that his arguments miss "the point of high-res" unless the point is to sell, sell, sell?

     

     

     

    The article mentions Pono right in the title. How is that not relevant? Because you and Chris disagree with the author? If we are going to discuss Pono, how can we not talk about the merits of hi-res audio?

    Please don't speak for me VandyMan.

     

    Discussion about the merits of high resolution audio will not be tolerated in threads about other topics. Using your logic, a discussion about the merits of high resolution audio should be allowed in nearly every thread and review on CA because nearly every device discussed supports high resolution audio and the manufacturer suggests this sounds better. We're not going down that path. This is a wonderful and enjoyable hobby, not a court case. Feel free to start another thread or jump into one of the countless other threads discussing the merits of high resolution audio.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Please don't speak for me VandyMan.

     

    Discussion about the merits of high resolution audio will not be tolerated in threads about other topics. Using your logic, a discussion about the merits of high resolution audio should be allowed in nearly every thread and review on CA because nearly every device discussed supports high resolution audio and the manufacturer suggests this sounds better. We're not going down that path. This is a wonderful and enjoyable hobby, not a court case. Feel free to start another thread or jump into one of the countless other threads discussing the merits of high resolution audio.

     

    Hello Chris,

     

    I have already twice thanked you for exercising a curator's judgment for what is on topic and what is off topic. Now I'll praise you as someone who exercises the same criterion and has received push back. Although, this topic, Pono is a bit more complex, it is proper for you to set the criteria for what is on topic.

     

    I think it specious, however well intended, when a member equates exercising a curator's perspective and takes appropriate action when the admonition as curator is ignored and call it censorship or the equivalent. Too often, members post what is off topic and over time the magnet attracts chaos in the thread which unravels (pun intended).

     

    The saving grace and my rationale for supporting you, beside from agreeing with your curatorship, is that you are not censoring another member's post but requiring the member to post elsewhere or start a new post. Therefore the member is still empowered to express his/herself fully and reference to other topics as desired.

     

    I support you in maintaining this position. One moment a member is wondering what prevents you from stepping in and then another member is contesting that you have stepped in and taken on the curator's hat to keep the thread on topic. Off topic posts, willy nilly, has long been an issue, in my view, at CA. In some threads the content is repugnant to some, or social and humorous, or stream of consciousness without regard to the integrity of the thread. Personally, I am tired of wading through off-topic posts to get to the subject of the thread.

     

    It just occurred to me that I may shortly be edited out of this thread as I recognize I am off-topic even in my support of you. Delete me if so, I won't protest.

     

    I also support the other comments relating to Pono and all the issues that are related to the future of music rendition for sale that is contemplated for the raising of production qualities. Those views aren't be squashed, merely moved to another thread.

     

    I have no intention of debating my view beyond expressing my perspective.

     

    Best,

    Richard

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I listened to Neil talking about not using vinyl masters and safety copies etc. Now he seems to be saying he'll sell best available. HDTracks is already doing this and it's a disappointment. Now I wonder what Pono will do differently in that regard if anything?

     

    I have noticed the same dilemma. And articulated my concern about the significance of such statements as they pertain to Neil Young's goals for the future of music. I have backed this effort, having purchased a Limited Neil Young PonoPlayer.

     

    And given Neil Young's responses to Chris' probing questions, was surprised (or not) by what was not said ny Neil Young. NY may have been speaking disingenuously when describing himself as a mascot, hood ornament, not a business man, but in the same breath, those who are business men have already guides music rendition with criteria that prompts us to run and back Neil Young's vision.

     

    Stating this does not negate my support of NY's vision. But what I heard as a mission statement and the two responses from NY with specific reference to those mission statements lead me back to the status quo. Whether one calls it an artist's expression or non-interference AND leaving business decisions to those who are de facto businessmen is a calculus for more of the same. What determines significant changes in line with NY's visions with those statements from him which leads me in a circle back to where I (We?) started.

     

    I ask this question in support of NY's vision and as a reaction to his response. I want NY to succeed. But like promises made by candidates for office who will take on the Status Quo of a system well entrenched and in the control of the business men, once they are elected by the People who thrive on change, the candidate now must contend with a system that decides whether or not anything he proposes will get done. How many times have we witnessed this scenario?

     

    I hope Pono succeeds.

     

    Enjoy the music,

    Richard

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Richard: I am pretty sure that I get your point--and those of others wondering about how PONO will insure that they are offering "the best available" as NY puts it.

     

    As every label and service attempting reissues in the past has found out--and as we listeners have experienced from the end product--there are tons of variables and obstacles. To name a few:

     

    *Negotiating with the label or artist for rights to the material;

     

    *Tracking down/obtaining/verifying source tapes of the best quality (This can be particularly problematic if the goal is to release hi-res because while the original multi-track masters may be high-rate, the 2-channel mix-downs might not be as high or the label may only have access to the downsampled-for-CD files.);

     

    *In the case of source material on analog tape, the model, heads, alignment, and electronics of the tape deck used for transcribing, as well as the A/D converter and all involved skills and associated electronics will have an impact on the final product. (Will there be a PONO studio and Steve Hoffman-caliber guy on staff overseeing production?)

     

     

    So far as I have read, NY and Co. have only said they will attempt to obtain the best source material. It is unclear if that means just whatever the highest-res files the label sends them, or if it will involve any extraordinary efforts to produce albums from material closest to the masters.

     

    Taking a larger view, I personally am hoping that PONO will not just become a source for hi-res reissues. I don't think that is what the world or the movement towards high quality downloads needs at all! What we need is for EVERY new and existing artist release to be offered at full-res (even just Redbook would be fine with me). A few hundred or even a few thousand titles is not going to put much of a dent in the universe of access/awareness of quality music files. PONO will certainly raise some awareness--as it already has a little with national press coverage--but my biggest hope/dream is that it somehow prompts Apple to flip the switch in a year or two to offering all iTunes users the choice between downloading its current AAC or choosing FLAC for a quarter or a couple bucks more (per track or album respectively).

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am really curious why they picked Ayre and dumped Meridian eventually. There are two possibilities from what I read.

     

    1. Meridian declined the offer because Pono did not give them a sufficient lead time. Ayre took over, and agreed to finish the design within four weeks. Hefley of Ayre admitted that the partnership "came together only about 60 days ago" and they "spent three straight weeks just hard-core working" because Pono had "a deadline to get this done".

     

    Ayre hears 'buzz' from PonoMusic player | Today's News | Boulder County Business Report

    Boulder firm develops chip for Neil Young venture | CharlotteObserver.com

     

    2. The choice was made based on SQ. The quote was taken from their Kickstarter's page:

     

    'Recently Neil wanted to listen to a new prototype of the player which had new audio enhancements and to compare it to the previous version. He listened to the newer version for about a minute and then asked us to play the older one and we did. He listened to it for about 3 seconds and turned it off and started walking out of the room. I thought something had gone wrong and asked him what happened? He simply said "the new one is better." I was astonished. I asked him how he could tell in 3 seconds? How could he have possibly listened long enough? His response caught me by surprise. He said "I don't listen, I feel!".'

     

    Right. Three seconds. Based on the "feeling" of one person (and his hearing ability is very much lost)...

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    And Pono please add EQ and Crossfeed in your player. They are basic DSPs. Even Sansa Clips can do those.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am really curious why they picked Ayre and dumped Meridian eventually. There are two possibilities from what I read.

     

    That's a good question. I can't imagine it's because Meridian didn't have enough lead time. They had FAR more than Ayre apparently had:

    EXCLUSIVE: Neil Young visits Meridian

     

    I think your second possibility is more likely. From the BCBR link you provided:

    "Young had gotten wind of some devices Ayre makes for the professional audio world [QA-9?], and liked what he heard. PonoMusic officials then approached Ayre about designing the guts of their device, while PonoMusic designed the look, navigation and other aspects."

     

    Perhaps Meridian and Pono couldn't come to mutually agreeable terms, but that quote makes it seem that NY preferred Ayre's SQ.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am really curious why they picked Ayre and dumped Meridian eventually. There are two possibilities from what I read.

     

    I recall Meridian stating on record that 24/96 is more than enough. Maybe there was some disagreement over that.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Richard: I am pretty sure that I get your point--and those of others wondering about how PONO will insure that they are offering "the best available" as NY puts it.

     

    As every label and service attempting reissues in the past has found out--and as we listeners have experienced from the end product--there are tons of variables and obstacles. To name a few:

     

    *Negotiating with the label or artist for rights to the material;

     

    *Tracking down/obtaining/verifying source tapes of the best quality (This can be particularly problematic if the goal is to release hi-res because while the original multi-track masters may be high-rate, the 2-channel mix-downs might not be as high or the label may only have access to the downsampled-for-CD files.);

     

    *In the case of source material on analog tape, the model, heads, alignment, and electronics of the tape deck used for transcribing, as well as the A/D converter and all involved skills and associated electronics will have an impact on the final product. (Will there be a PONO studio and Steve Hoffman-caliber guy on staff overseeing production?)

     

     

    So far as I have read, NY and Co. have only said they will attempt to obtain the best source material. It is unclear if that means just whatever the highest-res files the label sends them, or if it will involve any extraordinary efforts to produce albums from material closest to the masters.

     

    Taking a larger view, I personally am hoping that PONO will not just become a source for hi-res reissues. I don't think that is what the world or the movement towards high quality downloads needs at all! What we need is for EVERY new and existing artist release to be offered at full-res (even just Redbook would be fine with me). A few hundred or even a few thousand titles is not going to put much of a dent in the universe of access/awareness of quality music files. PONO will certainly raise some awareness--as it already has a little with national press coverage--but my biggest hope/dream is that it somehow prompts Apple to flip the switch in a year or two to offering all iTunes users the choice between downloading its current AAC or choosing FLAC for a quarter or a couple bucks more (per track or album respectively).

     

    Hello Alex,

     

    I appreciate your response. If I am correct we are converging early on in reaching the destination we both hope for. Hope, a word, an expectation, a wish for both of us in using that perspective, if I am correct.

     

    Perhaps, the obvious isn't. Perhaps to take on an industry well-entrenched in its system of producing music as a business versus artists who do so requires a movement, a starting point and the momentum to move mountains. If the Mountain will not come to Mohammed, perhaps Neil Young is going to the mountain. Given the Public's response which signifies as good a start as any and the hint of a momentum provided the people Neil Young trusts and delegates to are sincere and competent. We need action not good intention. We need diligence not excuses, not convenient coulda, shoulda, woulda.

     

    Speaking of trust, some artists are business men and have other competencies. And some are not and delegate to those who would betray their trust to their economic disadvantage. I am not informed, or know and understand the business end of music production. How much hands on Neil Young intends is not something discussed. Given Billy Joel's problems and losses of some 80 million allegedly by a trusted representative or whatever his responsibilities were, I merely mention how different templates for success there are along the way. Joel was not vigilant and may have delegated more than his trust. He may delegated his responsibility. We are after all Humans-in-Training and some lessons come hard.

     

    Success is measured by many indices. Whether what we hope for and what those delegated with the trust, control and therefore, the power power to follow through with Neil Young's mission correspond to the same values and criteria, remain to be discovered.

     

    I would have felt better had Neil Young's responses to Chris left me with a stronger foundation for the Hope we both exercise. I heard, perhaps understatement and a reserve - not psychic - but I felt equivocation. I wanted to hear iron in his words. I am a student of Huna, now for thirty some years. My Hope is directly attached to the Highest Good. One who lives the action of Pono sets a pathway with his/her intention; lines up the obstacles which become a blue print for what to turn into opportunities and then follows through with action consistent with those outcomes making course correction along the way, just as professional pilots do 90 to 95% of the time and land at the right destination.

     

    This presupposes that a landing field has been constructed for the mission to land on. I am speaking in metaphors which may or may not find fertile ground in the overall discussion. Medicine, Magic and Miracles (setting goals, taking action to accomplish those goals, accomplishing those goals and able to repeat the accomplishment at will) is my construct.

     

    Sincerity is measured by time. What tunes get played in the future, I've stocked up on the player. Hope they fit the bill.

     

    Thank you for your thoughts.

     

    With appreciation,

    Richard

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Right. Three seconds. Based on the "feeling" of one person (and his hearing ability is very much lost)...

     

    Ulogin, maybe I'm missing your point, but why wouldn't it be fine to judge a musical passage based on feeling?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    As every label and service attempting reissues in the past has found out--and as we listeners have experienced from the end product--there are tons of variables and obstacles. To name a few:

     

    *Negotiating with the label or artist for rights to the material;

     

    *Tracking down/obtaining/verifying source tapes of the best quality (This can be particularly problematic if the goal is to release hi-res because while the original multi-track masters may be high-rate, the 2-channel mix-downs might not be as high or the label may only have access to the downsampled-for-CD files.);

     

    *In the case of source material on analog tape, the model, heads, alignment, and electronics of the tape deck used for transcribing, as well as the A/D converter and all involved skills and associated electronics will have an impact on the final product. (Will there be a PONO studio and Steve Hoffman-caliber guy on staff overseeing production?)

     

     

    So far as I have read, NY and Co. have only said they will attempt to obtain the best source material. It is unclear if that means just whatever the highest-res files the label sends them, or if it will involve any extraordinary efforts to produce albums from material closest to the masters.

     

    Taking a larger view, I personally am hoping that PONO will not just become a source for hi-res reissues. I don't think that is what the world or the movement towards high quality downloads needs at all! What we need is for EVERY new and existing artist release to be offered at full-res (even just Redbook would be fine with me). A few hundred or even a few thousand titles is not going to put much of a dent in the universe of access/awareness of quality music files. PONO will certainly raise some awareness--as it already has a little with national press coverage--but my biggest hope/dream is that it somehow prompts Apple to flip the switch in a year or two to offering all iTunes users the choice between downloading its current AAC or choosing FLAC for a quarter or a couple bucks more (per track or album respectively).

     

    I feel the issues of provenance and newer material are extremely important.

     

    Re provenance, HDTracks took the position (not without some equivocation about quality assurance) that they were simply passing along what the labels gave them. This may make it easier to deal with the labels (and to be fair to HDTracks, they really lack the market share or reputational weight in the industry to enforce any desire for verified provenance on the labels), but it has turned a lot of folks who could be their biggest fans into hesitant customers of the "once burned twice shy" variety. I believe I remember reading, perhaps in FAQs released by Pono, that just like the ordinary consumer Pono can run Audacity or other software to detect upsampling, etc. That sort of step to verify provenance so the customer has confidence in a purchase would be I think a huge advancement over what's available in the market now.

     

    Re newer material, to a certain extent we're our own worst enemies, since we keep buying all the versions of the old stuff we say we're sick of. (Despite that, if a 24/192 Beatles collection became available tomorrow, I couldn't get there fast enough. Love at 24/96 is pretty amazing in places.) I hope Neil Young's reputation with other artists and the public can begin to move the hi res market toward new(er?) releases, e.g., if Springsteen likes Pono, maybe Springsteen does his next release on Pono as well as CD and iTunes. (OK, so Springsteen isn't the very newest artist around. Has Pharrell heard Pono? Do Li'l Wayne, Young Jeezy and Daddy Yankee have signature models yet?)

     

    I'm hoping really hard that what we get is more than just more of what we've got.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Guest
    This is now closed for further comments




×
×
  • Create New...