Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile
    The Computer Audiophile

    Pono or Oh No - An Interview With Neil Young

    thumb.jpg

    Sitting in an oversized bulbous chair outside the interview room waiting for my turn to speak with Neil Young was surreal. I didn't grow up a big fan of Neil. I was introduced to his music through my favorite band Pearl Jam. PJ frequently plays Rockin' In The Free World as an encore at its shows. In addition, Eddie Vedder of Pearl Jam refers to Mr. Young as Uncle Neil. According to Eddie, Neil has provided much needed guidance to the band from the mid-nineties monstrous successes to the suicide of Nirvana's Kurt Cobain and the band's decision to take a step back from the limelight. As I sat in the nice Austin breeze, several thoughts went through my head. I was expecting Neil to be tired of answering questions and possibly annoyed that a guy from Computer Audiophile was about to interview this vinyl loving rockstar. Let's face it, I'm no Ben Fong-Torres. Was I going to turn into Chris Farley interviewing Paul McCartney on Saturday Night Live? What if I said, "Remember when you were with Buffalo Springfield, that was awesome." My mind was spiraling out of control with endless possibilities. Fortunately my questions for Neil were on my iPhone and my Nagra ARES-MII recorder was in hand. All I had to do was ask the questions and listen to the answers. Then, Rick from Warner Brothers said, "Chris, you're up."[PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

     

    Chris Connaker: This is pretty damn cool for me Neil.

     

    Neil Young: Good.

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

    CC: You guys just hit $2 Million on the Kickstarter campaign. Are you surprised?

     

    NY: You know, I'm happy but I'm not surprised that people are reacting like they are. That's why I did this. I knew people wanted it. I wanted it. Musicians wanted it. And we're very grateful. But we're not surprised.

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

    CC: Computer Audiophile reader Bruce F. says hello.

     

    NY: Oh great, Bruce.

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

    CC: Are you still using the Pacific Microsonics Model II?

     

    NY: Ah, for some things. There are better ones now. Yeah it's a great one. The jury is out, but there are a few other things on the horizon which is good. But we still use it.

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

    CC: The entire Computer Audiophile community would like nothing better than to see Pono turn into the next Beats, but with high quality. Beats are everywhere. it would be great to see Pono everywhere. What's your goal with Pono?

     

    NY: The goal is to make people aware that there's another place to go. To bring freedom of choice to the audio experience that's been missing for twenty years. That's very unAmerican.

     

    CC: Says the Canadian.

     

    NY: Yeah, yeah. It's unworldly. We can't have no freedom. You can't be limited. You can't be. Just like we shouldn't be limited to one fuel for our cars, we shouldn't be limited to one type of music for our ears. Or one type of food for our mouths.

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

    CC: What would it take for you to say, "I've succeeded with Pono?"

     

    NY: If I succeed with Pono it might not be that Pono makes millions of dollars. It may be that we made out and we were able to be a company. Maybe we just survived because someone much bigger than us cam along with million and millions of dollars and out-spent us and out-did us and out-everythinged us and did what we did and brought this to the world in a way that we couldn't. Although I think we can. It's just in my history nobody has been interested. I know when they see success they become interested in how they can monetize it. It's a win-win for music and audio to find out what's missing today. If Pono does that it's a huge victory. Were on our way to doing that. You can see something is happening. I'm sure that people in the audio community are encouraged to see the reaction of the people on the street. That's what we've always been about. Were not an audiophile company. We are about bringing the quality to the people the way it used to be. In other words we made analog records that became vinyl and that was the quality we made in the studio then it went to the people. We're not doing anything new. All we're doing is saying, in the studio today make your digital music in whatever resolution you want to make it at. We're going to say what it is on our player you'll know. It will be there somewhere. People will learn when they listen to things. When it sounds great they'll get curious. They'll want to know what it is. Some of them may some of the may not. They'll choose to take a look. A go, look at that, I love this, and it's 192. It's one of three things I have that are 192. All the others are lower res, some are 48, some are 96. They may, in their mind, go "oh shit" this is what it sounds like at 48, really great. I wonder what it would have sounded like at 192. The awareness of those differences and the palette musicians have to play with will change. Producers will now be able to use resolution as an effect. It can be super clear if you want that. Or, it can be dull if you don't want that. Even within one recording you can go from low res to high res. You can use it as a tool. You can use it creatively. You can turn it on and off. The whole recording will have to be presented at it's highest resolution. But if the chorus and the hook are at 192, and the rest of the song is at 44.1 or 48, something compatible, then it's mixed at 192. The source was low res, the chorus was super high res, some of the vocals are really high res, some are dull. It's a new way to play. A whole new thing. That kind of creativity in the studio is possibly a new tool for the hip hop and rap community. It's not one of the things they've done. They are very creative and incredibly poetic in their way, which I appreciate. Yet, guys like me can do what we do. Create things the way we create them. Whatever we do in the studio, we finish, we can hand it in to Pono and it's going to sound exactly like what we did. Through the best player you can get. You may be able to make some improvements to our player, maybe not in our size. We really got a great sound. It's an odd shaped player because of what's in it. We had to make some things big to make those earphones sound good. There's a reason for everything. It's not just because we thought it was cool. Although we do think it's cool. We think it stands for something. That's who we are. That's what we do. We're not a format. We are anti-format. We don't want the musicians to ever have a format again. Formats are for computer companies.

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

    CC: I'd rather listen to Pearl Jam on an AM radio than listen to Scottish nose whistle at 24/192. Content is king. Can Pono get the record labels to completely open their vaults?

     

    NY: Yes. Have you seen the Pearl Jam (Kickstarter PonoPlayer signed edition) offering, it's blowing through the roof.

     

    CC: I bought it yesterday the second I saw it. It's all sold out.

     

    NY: They sold out?

     

    CC: Yeah.

     

    NY: I figured it would. They were the second or third one to sell out. The other ones did because I was on them and I have a lot of my fans going to the site. That makes sense. Pearl Jam selling out is great. There are other ones on the way. It's just a matter of time. We keep adding more artists. James Taylor (Kickstarter PonoPlayer signed edition) came out today.

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

    CC: Numbers such as sample rate and bit depth are only part of the equation. The people behind the recordings are more important. Will there be a Pono certification or guarantee or Mastered for Pono type thing to designate tracks that are of pono quality.

     

    NY: No. Pono is Pono. You make what you make. When we say it's Pono that means we are bringing you the closest thing to the master, if it's not the master, if it's not the native resolution it's the closet thing to it that was mastered. Then were asking why the hell didn't they master the native resolution. If you buy what it is they supplied, and there's a higher resolution, and we're after them to master it, and they master it, you get it. You don't have to pay for it. You've already bought the best it can be. The best it can be is what we're gong to give you. You just have to download it again in our store. You'll get notified in our little newspaper, these are the new things that got upgraded. You bought it, you can believe if we can we'll upgrade it if it's not it's high as it ever can go. A lot of our stuff will be as high as it will ever get. A lot of people recorded at low res in the last little bit of time. Before that it was different. It's only recently people gave up. There's a window of that. There's nothing we can do about that. We can't put people down for that. We'll play whatever it was they were able to do. They created it. That's what Pono is. It's not about mastered for Pono. It's mastered. Period.

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

    CC: Will Pono have an effect on the Loudness Wars or encourage less dynamic range compression.

     

    NY: (Long pause) Well, I don't know. It could. To me dynamic range is king. The music decides how compressed it is. If you make a mix and you make the mix, not mastering, in the mix, that's where you do the compression. You compress certain instruments as an effect. That's really all you want. You want that shit to pump so that's what you compress. Why compress what comes and goes? You don't have to make that decision in mastering. The artist can make the decision. If they want something that pumps and grooves all the way through like ah, what the hell is the name, it's a great great band, two guys, two guys (The Black Keys -CC), Yeah, they are great. They use a lot of compression in their mixing. They record at like 48. I've noticed what they do. They'll have more to play with. They can still have that sound and have it be a 192 master with just like one area of the song, maybe the hook, or one instrument be 192, just fucking, what the hell is that! The mix is made up of these two things (sample rates). You get source stuff that is 48k, it's not going to be higher than 48k unless you put acoustic echo on it and that echo will be at 192k. Using resolution as an effect is one of the offshoots of Pono. That's one of the creative tools that people like the Black Keys, Kanye West, Eminem, Jay Z, LIl' Wayne, can use. They are very creative, let them go, let them have whatever they want we just give them more.

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

    CC: How will PonoMusic, the Pono online store, be different from sites like HDtracks, or will it be different?

     

    NY: I don't know what the HDtracks store is like. The Pono Store will be the Pono Store. We sell stuff that is Pono. It's the best that's available. Period.

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

    CC: Will you have any exclusive Pono releases?

     

    NY: It depends. If we pay to have it mastered it may be ours for a while but there's no reason to keep it. It should be everybody's. If we pay to master it we'll want to have it for awhile so we can say look what we did then everybody can have it we don't care. It's about music it's not about owning it. We don't want to own somebody's master or the rights to sell it, but it would be nice to have a little windows if we made it available.

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

    CC: Will Pono address the provenance issue that's going on right now, as an example one of your recordings Le Noise was released at 24/96 but the material used to create that was 44.1 or 48k, will Pono provide details of up sampled albums?

     

    NY: Everything that is on Pono will be listed as exactly what it is. I don't know about the DVD of Le Noise. I'm trying to think what that was. Maybe that was up sampled because of the ... let's see is there anything on there … I think it's at 48 … I though it was high res, I wasn't focused on that part when I made it. That was Daniel Lanois who did that, they were cool but they didn't take it to the max which I thought they would. They had a board from Canada, I don't know what the hell it's called, like a Xanax or something, something I've never seen before. A very mellow board a Xanax (Neil laughs). Anyway, it was a 48k board and I didn't know that but I think it may have been at 96 on the DVD because it had videos. But there wouldn't be a Blu-ray because there was no reason. The DVD standard may have been 96k, but if they doubled it up that was wrong. That shouldn't have happened. It doesn't sound worse.

     

     

    CC: I believe Chrome Dreams II has an issue (interrupted by Rick from Warner Brothers, the interview time is over).

     

    NY: What do you believe about Chrome Dreams?

     

    CC: I believe it was the same situation as Le Noise, people have posted graphs online and it looked up sampled.

     

    NY: I think we did that at our studio, I know where I recorded it. I'll ask Niko Bolas about that. I'd be surprised if that was the case. There may have been some of the tracks at a certain level so we used the certain level for everything. Pono will be transparent. There will be a page. You'll be able to read what it is. We can tell just like they can tell. All you have to do is look at it. If someone says what it is when they give it to us we'll check it. Those things matter and there's no reason why we can't have that.

     

    CC: That's great, Computer Audiophile readers are really looking for that stuff.

     

    NY: Good that's important stuff. I agree with them that it's important. Pono is a chance to buy material and use it in whatever way they want to play it back. We think our player is pretty damn good, I'm mean look who made it. It's really good and you can take it with you and plug it into anything. The problem with some of the things we're going to encounter, if you have a new Ford or Chevy or something like that, you're going to have that Microsoft shit in there and it's going to downgrade whatever we put into it. We'll have to work through that.

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

    CC: Thanks Neil, it was a pleasure.

    NY: Thanks.

     

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

    Pono or Oh No

     

    March 11, 2014, Neil Young announced PonoMusic and the PonoPlayer at South by Southwest. In addition Pono, the company, launched a Kickstarter campaign seeking $800,000. Based on the amount of press and the amount of money raised thus far, $4.1 Million, I think Pono is off to a great start. At the Saint Cecelia hotel before the interview I had an opportunity to listen to the PonoPlayer. The sound was very good coming through the TAD CR1 loudspeakers and Ayre Acoustics integrated amplifier. The selection of wonderfully mastered music didn't hurt :~) The PonoPlayer connected to this Ayre / TAD system is the only PonoPlayer in the world designed by Ayre Acoustics. In fact, the player was in a little black box that accepted digital output from the yellow PonoPlayer (a feature not planned for the final design). This black box was design by Ayre shortly before the show. There wasn't enough time to assemble an additional player. Thus, all listening impressions of the PonoPlayer done through headphones are now obsolete. The PonoPlayers available for headphone playback were the old Meridian design that will not make it to production.

     

     

    Like every product brought to market, Pono has its share of fans and detractors. I was initially surprised by the comments of a few skeptics that railed against Pono for its lack of specifics about the PonoPlayer and the PonoMusic Store, and its Kickstarter campaign. In addition, a few people just had to go on record as the first folks to predict Pono's demise. The surprising part was this negativity emanated from some in the audiophile community. Nobody commenting had heard a single song on the Ayre Acoustics designed PonoPlayer, yet some were stating how Joe Sixpack will never tell the difference between Pono and a lossy iTunes track. Give Pono room to breathe people. Pono is something many audiophiles have wanted for decades. It's a movement with the ability to bring awareness of good sound quality to the masses. Plus, all ships rise with the tide. If Pono succeeds, sites like HDtracks and Acoustic Sounds will grow exponentially. High end manufacturers will benefit from an influx of new customers seeking better sound quality at home, in the office, or in the car. Imagine the traffic in David Wasserman's Stereo Exchange at 627 Broadway in New York City when he places a Pono banner in the front window. People who saw Neil Young's CNBC interview from South by Southwest may waltz through the door to see what Pono is all about. The opportunity to give this industry a shot in the arm is ripe. There are no losers if Pono succeeds.

     

     

    Setting my rose colored glasses down for a moment, I also see the uphill battle ahead for Pono, good sound quality, and the high end industry as a whole. Convenience always trumps quality for the masses. Pono must deliver on both quality and convenience to succeed. What happens when people give Pono a listen and don't hear a difference between it and their iPhone with lossy AAC files? Who knows. But, these may be the same people selecting $330 Beats headphones over a pair of cheaper and better Sennheisers at the Apple Store just because the color is white or red or different. People purchase products for any number of reasons. Maybe Pono can get in the door thanks to Neil Young and his fellow rockstars' endorsements. Would the Beats company be what it is today without celebrities? Not a chance. Pono also has to get ready for the unsatisfied customers who purchase clearly upsampled albums and the onslaught of Internet chatter that follows. No matter what Neil says about transparency and provenance and letting the customers know what they are getting, upsampled material will sneak through to the PonoMusic Store. In addition to 44.1 kHz albums masquerading as 96 kHz albums, Pono faces the same pressure as all high resolution music retailers when it comes to price. It remains to be seen if the higher prices of higher sample rate content will scare off the masses.

     

     

    I want Pono to succeed. Sure, this is un-journalistic but if Pono succeeds we all win. What's not to like about more good music and success for manufacturers producing playback devices and all the accessories? What's not to like about more choices for consumers? What's not to like about more competition among online music retailers? Pono has the potential to bring in the tide and lift all boats still floating.

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

    photo-800px.JPG

     

    6Y5A2869-900px.jpg

     

    6Y5A2865-900px.jpg

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Chris did you get a chance to fiddle around with the Pono Player at all? It'd be great to hear some impressions of the intuitiveness of the interface. Great review, looks very promising!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Fantastic Chris. I remember with great fondness listening to "Harvest" and "After the Gold Rush" on a battery operated tape deck in the early 70's while sitting around a camp fire at a surf break on the edge of the Australian desert half way between Adelaide and Perth.

     

    We were living in tents in an extreme environment and were into honesty, openness and solitude while surfing massive waves that took all my courage. Nature at its purest and most extreme. Neil's music fitted perfectly. Hopefully your interview will help enlighten those that remain skeptical that this man has never been about the money, he's about bringing back to his audience what he genuinely believes has been lost to them - his craft.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris did you get a chance to fiddle around with the Pono Player at all? It'd be great to hear some impressions of the intuitiveness of the interface. Great review, looks very promising!

    I used the PonoPlayer a bit. The interface is simple and enables the user to get right to what he wants. I also got the impression that the interface will undergo some changes or improvements between now and when the player hits the market. Ii think the interface is on the right track with simplicity.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris (apologies if this has been asked before), will you be able to use PONO player as a stand alone DAC with either a USB or digital input and analogue output?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris (apologies if this has been asked before), will you be able to use PONO player as a stand alone DAC with either a USB or digital input and analogue output?

    This isn't planned for the first PonoPlayer.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It is kind of funny that Neil did not know about HDtracks.com, it's kind of like on that movie Knocked Up, where they wanted to release that "Flesh Of The Stars" webpage and they did not know about Mr. Skin's website!

     

    Did not expect that analogy. Cracked me up. Ya think Neil's takin' it okay?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This was obviously a very good question 'What would it take for you to say, "I've succeeded with Pono?"' That must have been fun. Great interview.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Chris. Stupid Question : despite all my inquiries, I haven't been able to determine if classical music (both modern one and transferred to numeric old analog recordings) will be concerned by the pono offer ? Any ideas ?

     

    Thanks !

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Chris. Stupid Question : despite all my inquiries, I haven't been able to determine if classical music (both modern one and transferred to numeric old analog recordings) will be concerned by the pono offer ? Any ideas ?

     

    Thanks !

    I suppose some classical will be available if the major labels participate.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm on board for sure, happily ordered a NY signature pono player. Chris, great site and interview. I'm new here. I've been busily ripping my Dvd-a discs to try out. I'm cautiously optimistic that the Neil Young, REM and Talking Heads rips at 96kb will sound pretty good.

     

    One question I have not seen answered: will the player have a shuffle mode? I use that all the time in my car and at home. Thanks again!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm on board for sure, happily ordered a NY signature pono player. Chris, great site and interview. I'm new here. I've been busily ripping my Dvd-a discs to try out. I'm cautiously optimistic that the Neil Young, REM and Talking Heads rips at 96kb will sound pretty good.

     

    One question I have not seen answered: will the player have a shuffle mode? I use that all the time in my car and at home. Thanks again!

    My guess is yes it will have shuffle mode. That's a trivial feature to add for zero additional cost.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Ny's answer to CC's question about Loudness wars is somewhat discouraging. Same old process sold as artistic expression.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Congratulations on the interview Chris…it sounds like you really connected with Neil. And you covered much of the CA concerns on a variety of topics. Really nice work.

     

    John

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Ny's answer to CC's question about Loudness wars is somewhat discouraging. Same old process sold as artistic expression.

     

    Same reaction, but even more so than "somewhat discouraging". I must be naive when it comes to what artist's expressions include. I thought the Loudness affect was antithetical to conveying an artist's sound. That is, I am distinguishing what the Loudness War affect does to my sense of the music and sensory input, fatigue and general distaste. If that is congruently an artist's expression vs production quality, I am back where I started.

     

    Congratulations, Chris, on your interview. You make us at CA proud.

     

    Enjoy the music,

    Richard

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Same reaction, but even more so than "somewhat discouraging". I must be naive when it comes to what artist's expressions include. I thought the Loudness affect was antithetical to conveying an artist's sound.

    I hear you. And like you, I don't really feel the need of those compressed fuzzy vocals, etc.

     

    But I think the way he said it is right -- using lo-fi in the mix is one of the musician's tools and so they'll use it and continue to experiment with it. From that point of view, isn't compression used just like a fuzz box?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just wanted to check...

     

    Does anyone know if the Pono comes with headphones?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just wanted to check...

     

    Does anyone know if the Pono comes with headphones?

     

    does not

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I finally fell for it and signed up for a Herbie Hancock Pono.

     

    I hope the sound quality beats that of 320kbps AAC and mp3s on my iPhone4 which is currently what I use on the go with ER4P in-ears or Bose QC15 cans so that Pono justifies (1) its price and (2) its form factor.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    One a first quick reading of this inteview I'm very happy NY addresses the studio/creative side not only of resolution but also of the use of compression, limiting &ct.

    It's not an evil thing by default but can be used as a tool to deliver the artist's aesthetics.

     

    Looking forward to read again with more time, great work Chris.

     

    Stephan

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Nice work Chris C.. I support Pono as I have the Tom Petty player coming in Oct 2014. Been following the guy since his first band the 'Sundowners' (Petty was 14 at the time) then the Epics in Gainesville Fla which later became Mudcrutch.

     

    Anything Pono can do to improve upon the music experience is ok by me.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Thanks for asking the questions about provenance. Seems to be a difficult issue but hopefully getting better. I wonder if Neil can pry the Rolling Stones masters away from Jody Klein?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris,

     

    Great interview! I know the whole rock star thing is so crazy from my experience starting with ELP in 1980 and now with NAMM exposure to our work with Barenaked Ladies. It's kind of funny how in the end they are just normal people.

     

    ~~~

     

    First as someone who does a lot of PRO audio work. Doing everything at 192 is still kind of silly. It does not down sample to 16/44.1 very well. The use of 176.4K makes so much more sense.

     

    Second I think a lot of people are confused by Pono. The two pieces (online store and the hardware) seem to be clumped together and people are not realizing that the music they download can be played by any hardware.

     

    I have had so many really crazy emails since last week its almost funny. Many of the questions were "How do I plug the Pono Player into my DAC?". Many think this is the only way to playback the music they bought on the online store. But all these files are FLAC so they can be played back by most playback software (though not iTunes).

     

    I may suggest to the Pono people a little more explanation would go a long way.

     

    Thanks,

    Gordon

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This has been really interesting to watch. Thank you Chris. I was (and am) still a bit skeptical about how they've decided to launch their business. But, you can't argue with the success they've had on kickstarter.

     

    Maybe they'll start out with the same files HD Tracks and others have.* But, if this does take off - and if they are open to posting feedback about the quality of the files - they I think they'll have a real impact on the industry. The most credible thing about this is Neil Young's ability to connect with artists. That feedback, represented by his Pono users, should have a real impact. He's put his money where his mouth is in a big way, and you gotta respect him for that. Meanwhile, I'm still holding out for a Bob Dylan signature player....

     

    *I just read his interview with Audiostream. at that point in the day, he seems to be very aware of HDTracks.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well, great interview. I'm a little disappointed there are going to be no Pono standards for quality, but I get why they wouldn't want to do that.

    As has been said, if they allow feedback on the site, it should enable us to comment on SQ and Volume compression of the files. I think that would put some market pressure on labels to produce better sounding albums. At the very least, they might make a high quality master and then muck it up for mp3 release, but leave it in audiophile form for Pono.

     

    My other conclusion from all this: I'm holding off buying any more NY until PonoMusic store arrives. We have to assume the best sounding versions of his work will be found there. So for remasters of older stuff I already own, and for new stuff from the last year or two that I haven't bought yet, I'm waiting to buy from Pono.

     

    P.S. NY didn't say in the interview he wasn't aware of HDT. He said he wasn't aware of what the sales experience (HDT store) on their site was like.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Guest
    This is now closed for further comments




×
×
  • Create New...