Jump to content
  • Gilbert Klein
    Gilbert Klein

    The Music In Me: Rap of History Backwards The

    A Warning:

    The last two songs in this article might offend some people, so keep that in mind if you’re playing it in a public space— Gilbert.

     

    An Introduction:

    Look, I know I know too little about this subject to say I’m an expert, so I’m not. I’m not going to opine on the form or its practitioners, proponents, prophets or phans. (Sorry, I just had to do that. You get it, with the phat thing, right?) I know there must be rap artists who are soulful more than angry, and I know some people are making beautiful music that’s called rap or hip-hop, and I’m sorry but I must conflate the two. I don’t know about it or the scene, and I don’t have to, because I only want to tell you about the first rap song that I heard, and do a little history. I like a little history. I’ll bet there isn’t a rock fan out there who doesn’t know who Chuck Berry is and his music, but I’d bet there aren’t many rap fans who know who Gil Scott-Heron is. But first, the history, and I’ll ask you to keep in mind that in the entertainment industry, innovation is quickly replicated and exploited.

     

    The History:

    Oh, I am so not the right guy to expound on the history of rap. But I heard a few lines from a song I hadn’t heard in years, see, and it made me think about it. And I have this column, see? I’m telling you now I’m no expert. I’m just a guy. Okay, a guy with a column. Like a lot of old people, I don’t get rap music. I didn’t get it when it started and I’m probably too old now; I ignore it now because when it first broke big, I just didn’t like it. There was too much violence, too many gats, glocks and putting a cap in someone’s ass. It all seemed to be swagger about n--gers, bitches, blunts and bling. I understood anti-social sentiment, honest- I’ve enjoyed a bit of it myself in my youth, but where was the music? Suddenly everyone was clever for stealing using bits from other people’s music. That didn’t used to be cool in the 60’s, man. I appreciated the innovation, but I just didn’t find the music in there. Okay, if melody was going to be subverted by cleverness, I gave it a listen, but what I was hearing just seemed… angry. I understood the anger coming out of urban, less privileged areas like Brooklyn, the Bronx and lower Manhattan. I got that. I got why it was coming from places like Compton. But I missed melody, you know?

     

    So rap sells a lot of music and is one of our most popular music forms. But nothing comes from out of a vacuum, so where did it come from? First, let’s look at the word “rap.” Yeah, it’s a bad thing if it refers to a criminal charge, but that wasn’t what it meant when we used it back in the mid-Sixties. It came from “rapport” and it usually meant that you were under the influence of the demon drug, marijuana. It just meant someone went on a talking jag. Logorrhea, as it were. Could have been about someone on meth, but it came out of the pot community. People got stoned and went off on verbal tangents, sometimes seemingly endlessly. It was kind of a joke, you know, when a guy looked around him and realized he’d been talking nonstop and had no idea what he’d been talking about. That was rapping. Or, you could be with someone else, or even a group, and having an earnest discussion. Pot wasn’t necessarily a component in this instance. That was rapping, too. I used to cringe when they called it a “rap session,” but that’s what we called them back then where I was, and I was in a lot of places. It was just silly talk or a serious discussion; either way, we rapped. And now it means something else, but that’s where it came from, and this is about how it got to here, so we’re going backwards.

     

    Let’s start with all the rap music that’s out in the world right now, and go back from there. Let’s include Kurtis Blow, Grandmaster Flash and the Furious Five, and Biggie and Tupac, and N.W.A. and Ice-T and Snoop Dogg and Eminem and Nicki Minaj and Kesha and everyone you know in that field, and there’s a lot of them. Let’s call all of them current artists, and yes, I know who’s dead. Let’s say that these are the folks you know, and for those of you that know more than I do about the recent history of rap, please excuse my glossing over most of the details to get to the first of it. Let’s go backwards to January, 1981. You’ll like this.

     

    The first mainstream rap hit song was “Rapture,” by Blondie. Rap song? Blondie? The New Wave hit machine? Well, it had a rap, no doubt, and up ‘til then, rap had always been tough black guys, mostly gangsta, you feel me? Well, Debbie Harry was as opposite all that as you could devise, but it was rap—okay, maybe rap-ish—but Blondie was a powerhouse group and the song did have rap. It was also the beginning of the Age of Video, and MTV played the bejeesus out of the song. It was November, 1980 when that song came out and became the first major pop hit with rap in it. It was dipping your toes in rap, but it was huge. What preceded it?

     

    Well, that would be “Rapper’s Delight,” by The Sugar Hill Gang, which came out in September, 1979, and went to #36 on the Billboard Hot 100, #4 on the Soul chart, #1 in Canada and Europe. It’s thought of as the first song to introduce rap (or hip-hop) to U.S. audiences, was a great big hit, and you know about sampling, right? This would be when sampling came into prominence, and from that development two phenomena emerged: today’s rap music, and a whole boatload of very wealthy lawyers. And you know who they sampled for this big hit?

     

    Well, that would be “Good Times,” by Chic, which came out in June of 1979, and went on to be sampled too many times to even estimate at this point (note: check out Who Sampled for a list of the 180 times this track has been sampled and many other delights - CC). But “Rapper’s Delight” was the first to almost go mainstream, and when it hit, Debbie brought legendary singer/songwriter/producer/ recent Rock ‘n’ Roll Hall of Fame inductee Nile Rodgers of Chic, to a club where he heard his beats and bass lines being used in some other guys’ song. He asked the DJ what record it was, the DJ told him he just bought it that day in Harlem, and it was an early version of “Rapper’s Delight,” whereupon they sued over the use of their record, and he and his bass player are now listed as co-writers. So, was “Rapper’s Delight” with all the “Good Times’” samples the first rap record to get serious airplay? No, that would be “King Tim III (Personality Jock),” by The Fatback Band, in March of 1979. And think about that title for an indication of how rare this was. It was happening fast, wasn’t it? Where’d this come from?  

     

    The funk dance outfit The Fatback Band was looking for something new, something energetic to put out. Knowing about the parties (remember- we’re going backwards here), they hired Tim Washington, an almost unknown MC who used to throw out raps at parties, and they recorded the song. They were a funk band, but they’d wanted something innovative, something to drive the song, so they went to a rapper because that was still all but unknown on any music charts, but there were dance parties in the Bronx and now elsewhere that were increasing in popularity, and rap was still exciting and daring. They thought the dance parties were not their dance crowd, so they put it out as the B-side. They thought those parties out there were for someone else,  but the song took off like a shot in clubs and parties, and they re-released it as the A-side. I’m guessing the folks over at Sugar Hill Records thought they were on to something as they prepared to release “Rapper’s Delight,” shortly thereafter, and they were right. So now we’re back in March of 1979, when “King Tim” came out. So where’d he come from? Glad I asked.

     

    What had been going on until “King Tim” was parties with MCs, starting in 1973, when Coke La Rock and DJ Kool Herc teamed up for a dance party in the Bronx to celebrate his sister’s birthday. La Rock improvised lines over the beats, mostly calling out to friends in the crowd and making up short stories to the beat, puffing up him and his friends. He did their first few parties from behind the speakers so no one knew who was rapping. For the sixth party, he started calling himself La Rock, and stepped out in front and got bolder, incorporating more poetry into his lines. His antics were getting closer to rap, but it was closer to a combination of performance art and showing off. The idea caught on and other parties started featuring MCs, and I’m using the term in a general way or we’ll be here all day.

     

    Their success made these two players influential as the other MCs started showing up at dance parties. Violence was always a part of the raps because they reflected the reality of life in the ghetto, but the lore must have included the night when DJ Kool Herc was stabbed at a party, and when La Rock went looking to settle the score, he found that friends of the perpetrator had sent the guy out of town. La Rock mostly retired from rapping after that, but his influence lived on with the current and then the next generation of rappers. Later rappers eschewed La Rock’s improvisations, writing out the lyrics out and rehearsing their rhymes with a crew, which allowed them to become more complex. These parties continued outside the notice of mainstream record labels and the songs appeared mostly on tape until The Fatback Band, and we’ve been there and done that, so what the hell could possibly have preceded Coke La Rock in 1973? I’ve got two names for you: Gil Scott-Heron and The Last Poets.

     

    Summer, 1971.  The “Sixties” are over, but racial tensions continue to erupt.

     

    Gi-Scott-HeronAnd this is where I came in. In the old days, the pre-Sixties, we only had AM radios and all we listened to was Top 40. When all that changed with the Underground Radio revolution, we all listened to our FM stations, and that was where this essay starts. The snippet of the song I heard that started me on this quest was in the opening music for the just-ended season of “Homeland,” on Showtime. I heard a phrase that I’d heard the first time in the song “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised,” by Gil Scott-Heron. It would only ever be played on FM in the summer of 1971; it was too hot for AM, and I don’t mean “hot” in the good way. Over the years, the phrase popped up now and then, and I know there isn’t an ex-hipster out there who forgot it, and when I heard it on that show, I wanted to know more about it.

     

    It was played on FM because it was daring, it was about “the revolution” that had evolved into the middle class when the hippies got married and had children; some were left some behind. AM wouldn’t touch it, and it didn’t ignite any flames that I know of, but I heard it, and so did those of us still listening. I wasn’t alarmed, but I did think that this was something new. Not just the message, but the medium. That was new, and I paid attention. It was in 1971, and it didn’t ignite any flames, but it was something different, and that’s what I heard. Different. It was jazzy and pop-ish, but it had a message, maybe a warning. In the early Sixties, Dylan wrote: “Yes, it is I who is knockin’ at your door if it is you inside who hears the noise,” and we heard him knocking when he sang,

     

    Oh the foes will rise with the sleep still in their eyes

    And they’ll jerk from their beds and think they’re dreamin’

    And they’ll pinch themselves and squeal and know that it’s for real

    The hour when the ship comes in

     

    The message was received, the Sixties had come and gone, and there’d been some changes made. But not enough for a lot of the black community, who were still restless, waiting for all the freedoms that were promised so recently. Black Olympians had raised their fists in the Black Power salute, James Brown said “I’m black and I’m proud,” but where were the changes? The influence of the Black Panthers had come and gone by 1971, when Gil Scott-Heron released “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised.” He was speaking for a group that was virtually unheard in pop culture, and we heard the warning. We’d heard it from Dylan, and he’d been chillingly right…

     

    I remember comparing the two in 1971. When I heard it recently, I asked myself if this wasn’t the origin of rap. It was certainly so in my mind, and then I saw that confirmed in my research, but I also found one more step backwards in the history of rap, and that would be to The Last Poets, a group founded in the wake of the late 1960’s Civil Rights Movement, and its Black Nationalist’s offshoot. Angry revolutionaries, they made no effort to couch their message in radio-ready language, and so it was months before Scott-Heron put out “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised” that they released The Last Poets, which, out of concern for my host’s inbox I will call: this song and the other song, neither of which you may play in sensitive situations.

     

    I never heard this group back then, and I can guess why. Maybe it was because of the language? I don’t know, maybe Station Managers or Program Directors or owners felt that playing Gil Scott-Heron was daring, but playing The Last Poets was a bridge too far. Even hippie stations had to sell ads and keep their licenses. Don’t know, don’t care; this is about the first rap music and I think this is it. Maybe you never heard of The Last Poets, either, but they were not unheard, and if you listen, you can hear their echoes today. Them and Gil Scott-Heron.

     

    Were they angry? Definitely. Got a point? You decide. What I decided was that this was as far back as I can trace rap. Yes, there may be evidence of rap as far back as the early 18th Century in Congo Square, but 1970 is as far as I go.

     

    Now rap is everywhere and has fragmented into styles and methods, as it should. It’s in clubs, on TV, on the web and stuck in people’s ears; if there are still boom boxes, then it’s there, too. It’s on the guy’s radio next to you at a red light, and at or near every 7-11 in at least in Southern California, and it’s in movies and TV soundtracks, and it’s in the news, and its biggest stars are the biggest stars, and it’s come a long way from The Last Poets and Gil Scott-Heron and Coke La Rock and The Fatback Band.

     

    You may now go back to the present day. And good day to you.  

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    GilbertgGilbert Klein has enough degrees and not enough stories. He’s been a radio talk show host, a nightclub owner, event producer, and has written two books: FAT CHANCE about the legendary KFAT radio, and FOOTBALL 101. He threatens to write one more. He spent 25 years in New York, 25 years in San Francisco, and is now purportedly retired in Baja.




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    24 minutes ago, firedog said:

    If there is a large population in the US that is unable to use standard English when needed, that's a failure of the greater social system and the educational system. It's not BECAUSE of the language in hip hop songs.

     

    Well, it sure isn't helping. These rich, successful rap stars are looked up to by kids who want to emulate them, including their speech patterns. While 'Lil Wayne may be able to read Shakespeare aloud with perfect elocution, I've never heard him do it, and neither have the impressionable kids who idolize him.

     

    I'm not advocating censorship, but I am not sure that some young minds have the intellectual capacity to embrace the hip-hip culture for entertainment, then dismiss any influence on their real life.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, wwaldmanfan said:

    I'm not advocating censorship, but I am not sure that some young minds have the intellectual capacity to embrace the hip-hip culture for entertainment, then dismiss any influence on their real life.

     

    That's where parents come into play.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    54 minutes ago, wwaldmanfan said:

     

    Well, it sure isn't helping. These rich, successful rap stars are looked up to by kids who want to emulate them, including their speech patterns. While 'Lil Wayne may be able to read Shakespeare aloud with perfect elocution, I've never heard him do it, and neither have the impressionable kids who idolize him.

     

    I'm not advocating censorship, but I am not sure that some young minds have the intellectual capacity to embrace the hip-hip culture for entertainment, then dismiss any influence on their real life.

    I was devoted to the Beatles as a child. I don't speak like a Liberpudlian. Neither do millions of British kids who worshipped the Beatles but didn't grow up in Liverpool and/or were raised in a home that spoke more standard British English. Embracing the entertainment culture of the time didn't necessarily determine speech patterns or other behaior. 

    Again, humans aren't such simplistic mechanic devices as your statement seems to assume.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Speed Racer said:

     

    Considering the size of the white poplulation, why is that so hard to believe? And, what does that have to do with anything anyway?

     

    It may reflect a life totally different than yours. But for the guys writing the words, and the community they come from, not so much. That's why the words are so vile.....it's how they actually think.

    Or not. How do you know? And who are "they"?

     

    When George Harrison wrote "Pigigies" do you  really think he personally thought "they" need "a damn good whacking"? And that he was advocating that each member of his audience whack someone from the establishment.

    I don't, and nothing in his life would make you think he did. 

    Is it really hard to understand that song lyrics can be written in the same way as a work of fiction is? Do you ascribe every action of a character in a novel to the writer?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

     

    Wow.

     

    P.S. Do you advocated against horror movies as well?

     

    No...because horror movies are fiction for everyone.....

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Speed Racer said:

    It may reflect a life totally different than yours. But for the guys writing the words, and the community they come from, not so much. That's why the words are so vile.....it's how they actually think.

     

    You have apparently made quite a close study of the lives and psychology of the people involved and the lyrics, especially for someone who says he never listens to the stuff.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    37 minutes ago, firedog said:

    Or not. How do you know? And who are "they"?

     

    When George Harrison wrote "Pigigies" do you  really think he personally thought "they" need "a damn good whacking"? And that he was advocating that each member of his audience whack someone from the establishment.

    I don't, and nothing in his life would make you think he did. 

    Is it really hard to understand that song lyrics can be written in the same way as a work of fiction is? Do you ascribe every action of a character in a novel to the writer?

     

    And then Bob Marley shot the sheriff, and that nasty Eric Clapton had to go and repeat it!  And glorify JJ Cale's druggie song, "Cocaine."

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm amazed that some of you guys think that parents can control how their kids think (if they even have two parents), or that young, unsophisticated minds are immune to the cutural barrage that they are constantly exposed to. 

    I don't know many teenagers who listen to their parents when they are told, "don't experiment with drugs, don't drink, don't have sex, don't listen to that degenerate music, etc." I say that based on my own experience growing up, even though I turned out OK.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 minutes ago, wwaldmanfan said:

    I'm amazed that some of you guys think that parents can control how their kids think (if they even have two parents), or that young, unsophisticated minds are immune to the cutural barrage that they are constantly exposed to. 

    I don't know many teenagers who listen to their parents when they are told, "don't experiment with drugs, don't drink, don't have sex, don't listen to that degenerate music, etc." I say that based on my own experience growing up, even though I turned out OK.

     

    Well, that's the thing, isn't it?  We human animals really want to find out for ourselves about all that stuff people who've already done it know is stupid or bad or dangerous.  But we somehow manage to survive and gain wisdom that will then be ignored by the next generation.

     

    Look, I have a stepson, but he was 14 when I met his mom, and I had very little to do with forming his personality.  So take whatever I say with a pound of salt, because I haven't done it from the beginning.  I have this feeling our example and how we teach our kids in general - the "tool set" we give them - may be more important than specific pieces of advice, especially of the "thou shalt not" variety.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, Jud said:

     

    Well, that's the thing, isn't it?  We human animals really want to find out for ourselves about all that stuff people who've already done it know is stupid or bad or dangerous.  But we somehow manage to survive and gain wisdom that will then be ignored by the next generation.

     

    Look, I have a stepson, but he was 14 when I met his mom, and I had very little to do with forming his personality.  So take whatever I say with a pound of salt, because I haven't done it from the beginning.  I have this feeling our example and how we teach our kids in general - the "tool set" we give them - may be more important than specific pieces of advice, especially of the "thou shalt not" variety.

     

    Right. Your kids will learn by observing your behavior, not what you tell them, especially if you are yelling. I see my parents in myself as an adult, but emulating how they lived, not what they told me to do.

    That is why I think kids are like sponges absorbing cultural stimuli, including films, music, and social media. Rap and other styles of music can potentially influence kids in a negative way. Remember the outcry over heavy metal and satanic themes, how some stupid teenagers commited suicide, etc? Nowadays, all this bad lyrical contents seems socially acceptable, even celebrated. I don't get it.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Ebonics has some superior abilities over std. English - e.g the ability to indicate a state of being, which English lacks.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Ralf11 said:

    Ebonics has some superior abilities over std. English - e.g the ability to indicate a state of being, which English lacks.

    What?  Is German better (Martin Heidegger - Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology)?

     

    I mean, if we want to get pretentious, let's go all the way.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Ralf11 said:

    Ebonics has some superior abilities over std. English - e.g the ability to indicate a state of being, which English lacks.

    Ummm.  Really? OK.. Example?  

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, Ralf11 said:

    Ebonics has some superior abilities over std. English - e.g the ability to indicate a state of being, which English lacks.

    Hooked on Phonics?  

     

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, wwaldmanfan said:

     

    Right. Your kids will learn by observing your behavior, not what you tell them, especially if you are yelling. I see my parents in myself as an adult, but emulating how they lived, not what they told me to do.

    That is why I think kids are like sponges absorbing cultural stimuli, including films, music, and social media. Rap and other styles of music can potentially influence kids in a negative way. Remember the outcry over heavy metal and satanic themes, how some stupid teenagers commited suicide, etc? Nowadays, all this bad lyrical contents seems socially acceptable, even celebrated. I don't get it.

    Yeah, kids are typically more susceptible to taking on behavior and other things from their favorite celebrities too.  Kids are more easily manipulated because their brains aren't fully developed and things like drugs (pot) and alcohol have been know to stunt one's brain development, ability to fully mature, etc. etc. etc. So if you start using drugs or alcohol, that makes things even worse.

     

    Kids typically go through the monkey see monkey do phase.  and some adults still act like kids because their drug and alcohol consumption didn't all them to fully mature. So you'll see people like Snoop Dogg still act like a child, even though he's an adult. Hence why some people might call him a ManChild.  A child in a man's body.  For many, they start going through their mid life crisis In their 40's or 50's trying to figure out who they are since they took on a lot of bullshit during their younger years and they want to find themselves.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, DRB100 said:

    Ummm.  Really? OK.. Example?  

     

    Are you a native English speaker?  Or have reading difficulties?

     

    Here is my post again:

    "Ebonics has some superior abilities over std. English - e.g the ability to indicate a state of being, which English lacks."

     

    The term e.g. means (in English) "example given".  That is ("i.e.") the example is given right after the term e.g.

     

    You can use Google to help you find some statements by linguists on the abilities of Ebonics, and what a "state of being" is in a language.  

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    MUSIC has real musicians playing musical instruments in it.

    And vocalists that can really sing.

    I find little of either in Rap / Hip Hop

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Sal1950 said:

    MUSIC has real musicians playing musical instruments in it.

    And vocalists that can really sing.

    I find little of either in Rap / Hip Hop

    Sal, I have a David Chesky record with two orchestral compositions. Both (except for some solo electric guitar in one), are played entirely on a synthesizer that has a bank of samples full of the actual sounds of all the instruments. No humans are involved in the playing. You feed the score in and it gets played as written.

    The result is quite dramatic and emotional. 

    Not music?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Sal1950 said:

    MUSIC has real musicians playing musical instruments in it.

    And vocalists that can really sing.

    I find little of either in Rap / Hip Hop

     

    I'd say that most of the vocalists in popular music have a hard time singing. Hence, the use of autotune. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yamaha has had those Disklaviers, which is a modern player piano, for many years where it will play what a musician performed and digitized.   But what's the fun of that?  And?  Chesky brought it down to charging people money to buy a CD of a computerized orchestra performing a score? He must be hurting for business if he resorts to doing that.

     

    Go have top classical experts compare the computer version to a top recordings of a great performance by a top orchestra and see what they say.  Make sure they're blindfolded.

     

    I wouldn't want to pay money to hear a computer replay someone else's score or performance.  Maybe that's why I stick to listening to music that has a lot of improvisational aspects to it.  Computers can't do that.

     

    if you like listening to a computerized version of something, then that's your thing. It's certainly not mine.  Maybe you are starting to lack a soul.  Maybe that's the first sign.  :-)

     

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, DRB100 said:

    Go have top classical experts compare the computer version to a top recordings of a great performance by a top orchestra and see what they say.  Make sure they're blindfolded.

     

    Not sure this makes sense to me. You're saying it has to be approved by classical experts to be a good product or a product that someone else can like? 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I watched an excellent documentary on Netfilx called, "Take Me To The River". It focused on the Memphis music scene during the heydey of Stax/Volt and Hi Records. The producers were the sons of legendary producer Jim Dickinson.

     

    They rounded up some of the old guard for a modern recording session, including music icons Bobby "Blue" Bland, Otis Clay, and William Bell. The idea was to rework some of the old classic songs, but overdub rappers for a modern twist. They got Snoop Dogg, and Cedric Coleman, who won the songwriting Academy Award for his unforgettable, "It's Hard Out Here For A Pimp".

     

    When they told Bobby Bland that they were going to overlay rapping on his vocal performance, you should have seen his face. He was... disturbed. Having dragged himself into the studio in his wheelchair, he tried to feign some enthusiasm, but to me he seemed insulted. He passed away shortly after the film was completed. I'm not saying that this incident contributed to his death, but it probably didn't help.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 minutes ago, DRB100 said:

    Go have top classical experts compare the computer version to a top recordings of a great performance by a top orchestra and see what they say.  Make sure they're blindfolded.

     

    I wouldn't want to pay money to hear a computer replay someone else's score or performance.  Maybe that's why I stick to listening to music that has a lot of improvisational aspects to it.  Computers can't do that.

     

     

    Well, classical musicians who heard the record thought it was quite good. Their only comment about the playing was that they could tell it wasn't a human orchestra - not because the playing wasn't good, but because the timing of the orchestra was too perfect. But that was just an observation, not a criticism.

     

    I also listen to a lot of improvised music. I don't see the contradiction. Classical and some other musics work from a score and don't have a lot of spontaneity - I enjoy both types.

    Two other suggestions: You might want to actually listen to it before you make up your mind about it. Second, as a newbie to the site, may I suggest that commenting that someone lacks a soul because of a record they mentioned is not a great tactic to employ. Putting a smiley after it doesn't mean it isn't an insult.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...