Retained
-
Member Title
Sophomore Member
-
Maximum bit rate and sampling frequency on iTunes and iPod
watchnerd replied to baxtus's topic in General Forum
I don't and never said I did. -
Maximum bit rate and sampling frequency on iTunes and iPod
watchnerd replied to baxtus's topic in General Forum
"Your 24/192 files on the iPOD are being reduced to 16/44.1 for playback..." It would if I would let it. But I turned off the downsample feature, so it just refuses to sync them. However, 24/192 plays just fine with external DAC. -
Maximum bit rate and sampling frequency on iTunes and iPod
watchnerd replied to baxtus's topic in General Forum
I convert from FLAC to ALAC using XLD. These all import into iTunes (on OSX) just fine, even crazy huge files like 24bit/192khz files. No playback issues to report. However, what they won't do is play back on iOS devices at that bit rate. -
64 bit playback on MAC OS X Snow Leopard 10.6.5 and above
watchnerd replied to a topic in General Forum
Now how do I check which kernel level my AppleTV is running? Yes, I know it's iOS, and a different chipset, but all this does make me wonder if there is some tweaking to be done there, too... -
Chris & Eloise, I'm wondering why you feel that 96khz is the max for optical out, given that (at least on new MacBook Pros), the optical out seems to be capable of doing 24/192, according to Apple: "The headphone / line output jack accommodates optical digital audio output, analog audio output with a 24-bit, 44.1-192 kHz D/A converter, digital audio output up to 24-bit stereo and 44.1-192 kHz sampling rate and supporting encoded digital audio output (AC3 and DTS)." See: http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1596
-
I got the new AppleTV last week. Previously, I was using Airport Express with Toslink out. I've now switched to AppleTV using HDMI. Bitrate is now 48k. It seems to sound a bit better, but there are so many variables involved (including different loudness levels) that I can't vouch for it being a real equipment difference. Home sharing is sweet because I don't need to control everything from the computer now. Usability, overall, is much better. The Airport Express has now been relegated to extending my wireless network and no longer handles music.
-
List Audiophile Quality Download Sites
watchnerd replied to The Computer Audiophile's topic in Music Downloads & Streaming
I feel pretty lucky when I find stuff I want in 'regular' lossless. True hi rez is so rare I've more or less given up on looking for it. -
"but at some point won't transferring the contents of huge data files potentially do more harm than the suggested improvements of ultrasound?" Can you elaborate? Because I don't understand your thinking on this. Unless the file becomes corrupted, why would it moving it around be harmful to its sound?
-
Just confirmed that the higher sampling frequency isn't correct. Looking in the Audi Midi settings for my 3 week old MBP: Highest bitrate: 2ch-32bit Highest sample rate: 96khz
-
"The latest MacBook Pro puts out 32-bit 196 kHz, which should make the tweak-heads happy." I have a pretty new Intel i5 15" MBP, about 3 weeks old now, but hadn't heard this. Do you remember where you read about it? And were you talking about via USB, optical, both, or other? Thanks!
-
Just got mine today, listening to it now via USB out of my Macbook Pro. I ordered a silver model from Amazon. http://www.nuforce.com/hp/products/iconhdp/index.php Current cans are AKG 701. Listening to standard 16/44.1 lossless at the moment, but will try hi-rez shortly. Happy to answer any questions.
-
"Sometimes things are so noticeably different that a double blind test just isn't needed, you know!" If the differences are that obvious, then you should be able to easily pinpoint the differences in a blind test with a high degree of accuracy. And if that happens, that's pretty amazing for files that are bit identical. That would be very very interesting.
-
"I can't explain the differences I hear but I do - so that leads me to try & find out why" There are really two possible scenarios here: 1. The heard difference is a psychosomatic effect, i.e. our mind playing tricks on us 2. The heard difference is due to some unknown phenomenon not easily explainable with current theories As someone with a scientific background, I think you can appreciate that Occam's Razor implies we should rule out #1 (the more likely scenario) before proceeding to #2. And I'm with DLF: I'm a skeptic because *I know how easily my mind can play tricks on me* and have proven it to myself several times in listening tests.
-
And what did you due to eliminate the possibility of the psychosomatic effects we know we're all vulnerable to?
-
I listed to the two files randomly using shuffle play in iTunes. I listened 10 times to each one (ugh). Listening done via AKG 701 headphones. I wouldn't detect any differences.