Jump to content

joelha

  • Posts

    1358
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Country

    country-ZZ

1 Follower

Retained

  • Member Title
    Senior Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Who is enjoying the heck out of his work, Chris? I'm very happy for you . . . and ultimately for the rest of us who will get the benefit of your experiences. Joel
  2. In spite of how well I think I already know what's out there, albums like this one remind me of how vast an ocean of truly outstanding music waits to be discovered, Joel
  3. This is my contention. I only wish price were more of the issue. There is quality audio equipment at almost every price point. I confess I have no hard statistics but I read far more about many in the younger generation wanting to buy a more expensive graphics card or better monitor for their gaming PC than I do those trying to get enough money together to buy a decent integrated amp. In short, for our hobby to compete on their list of priorities, it first must appear on their list of priorities. Sadly, in far too many cases, I don't think it does. Joel
  4. Very nice of you, 3dsoundshop. Thanks. Joel
  5. I'll take your first-hand experience over my assumption. Joel
  6. I'll take issue with at least portions of the last two statements: Here's a $1,000 system that would sound decent: Speakers - Debut 2.0 // DB62 Bookshelf - https://www.elac.com/db62 -$279.98 Integrated amplifier - NAD C316BEE V2 - https://www.crutchfield.com/S-g4OndonVypo/p_745C316V2/NAD-C316BEE-V2.html - $399.00 DAC - Schiit Modi Multibit - https://www.schiit.com/products/modi-multibit-2 - $299.00 To stay within budget, we'll cheap out on the cable and interconnects for this system but I've heard Elac budget speakers, Schiit dac's and still own an old NAD amplifier. I'm sure others could create a combination which would be equally if not more impressive for under $1,000. The issue is not price it's, as my article stated, that convenience in our society is increasingly trumping quality. People are less inclined to sit in one place and be blown away by their music. The other issue is that the brand names I've mentioned are generally unknown to the vast majority of non-audiophiles. Joel
  7. Thanks a lot, JoeWhip. Really good point about jazz clubs and movie theaters. Joel
  8. bbosler, While I did say "relatively modest monthly charge" regarding streaming, your numbers drive the point home very well. Thanks for that. Joel
  9. Thanks very much for your encouragement, Chris, and for giving me the opportunity to post the article. Joel
  10. Audio: Listen to this article. It is the best of times . . . hands down. While it’s hard to know how many readers agree, I’ll first deal with the reasons to disagree: High-end audio stores are becoming a rarity in the U.S. and many stores now reside in store owners’ homes. As a result, we have fewer opportunities to audition equipment, leaving us with audio shows, friends who live nearby who might have the component we’re interested in, and audio reviews. Hardly ideal alternatives. Speaking of audio shows, they’re infrequent and, if you have to travel a long way, expensive. What’s more, the show’s rooms (typically hotel rooms) are rarely ideal for critical listening. Finally, it’s always frustrated me that there’s an acceptance of conversation during listening sessions. I know people want to share opinions and conduct business but the primary reason for an audio show should be to hear audio. Online trolls are a downside of the industry. For reasons that are hard to understand, some people delight in trying to make others miserable. I’ll offer a theory in spite of the fact that it doesn’t reflect well on our hobby. Ours is generally a hobby enjoyed alone. Unlike a group getting together to watch a televised football game, we usually don’t invite “the guys” over to listen to Mahler. Does that mean we audiophiles are a bunch of social misfits? No, and I have a number of dear friends in the industry who certainly don’t fit that description. But I wonder, because of the nature of our hobby, if we have more than our share of maladjusted hobbyists. You might be thinking that there’s nothing new about trolling. People have always raised their “issues”. While that’s true, the internet has brought us online forums and anonymity which allows for far more obnoxious behavior. Where there used to be disagreeable letters to magazines, now there can be tiresome exchanges which often substitute vitriol for substance. There’s also the economy. Many people are struggling to pay their bills. How can it be “the best of times” when people struggle to pay for gas, groceries, and rent? Probably the best objection to my “best of times” claim is that, at least in the U.S., the high-end audio industry is shrinking. This is an existential issue that has been well documented and frequently discussed. In general, the younger generations seem to care more about audio convenience than audio quality. It’s not only their loss but ours as well. As we lose hobbyists we lose the high-end industry. It’s disappointing to see the advancing age of the average U.S. audio show attendee. Furthermore, how many non-audiophiles know of even reasonably priced audio brands such as Magneplanar and NAD let alone the higher-priced brands such as Wilson Audio or D’Agostino? I’ll bet a pretty small percentage. At least I can dream of owning a Learjet because I know what it is. But how does one aspire to own a product they’ve never even heard of? After all of that, what could be good? Fortunately, quite a bit. Without a doubt, the most significant advancement in our industry is technology and the internet. When I was a teen, the only way to add to my audio system or music collection was to either buy mail order products or hope there was an audio or music store nearby. Today, we have easy access to products in almost any part of the world. We can quickly learn about and order products from China, Europe, and Australia. We can view various manufacturers’ information online and quickly make comparisons between products. Internet searches not only help us find product reviews but find forums which allows us to interact with listeners internationally. Forums can also be indispensable for problem-solving. I can’t count the number of times I’ve been helped by someone willing to sacrifice their time to solve my audio issue. How about music downloads? It’s not easy to list all the sources of downloadable music (Qobuz, Hdtracks, Bandcamp, etc.). And the selection is growing, not only in terms of variety but also in terms of high resolution and surround options. You’d rather buy cd’s and vinyl instead of downloads? Discogs, Amazon, Analog Productions, and so many other companies offer a tremendous variety of music in almost any genre, new and used. Here again, an internet search will produce purchase options from all over the world. How about the renaissance in tape playback? Some are not only going back to reel-to-reel tape but even cassette tape. At least to some listeners, sound can be upgraded using a variety of upsamplers and programs minimizing the processes employed by Windows. There are countless other programs and tweaks available at the click of a mouse tempting many audiophiles to continually explore the possibility of getting even better sound. Room correction software is yet another method many are using to improve the sound they get in their listening space. While not as simple as a music download, the software is easy to get and can be installed and operated by someone with average computer skills. The benefits of these technical advancements don’t stop with the end-user. The ability of manufacturers to measure their products and globally source components is greater than it’s ever been. Ultimately, we are the beneficiaries. And how could I leave out streaming? Literally millions and millions of tracks are available, not only in two-channels but in surround as well, delivered to our rooms (or phones) in seconds for a relatively modest monthly charge. As for prices, I never understood the complaints I’ve read so often about high-priced audio. Sure, there are many uber-priced components which roughly equate to the price of a nice home. But in what way do those products affect our ability to shop at the lower end of the market? With a laptop or PC, even $100 will get you a decent tiny USB dac and in-ear monitors. For $500 you can get a nice dac, deskop amplifier and desktop speakers. And $1,000 will you a surprisingly good system including stand mount speakers, integrated amplifier and dac. And that’s shopping for new product. Shopping on-line for used products offers even more possibilities. I realize almost everyone reading this article is well aware of most if not all of the points I’ve made. But I’m not sure how many audiophiles have taken the time to reflect on the great audiophile times in which we live. It is easy to take all that we have for granted and, given the frustrations we experience in our hobby and even in life, it’s important to reflect on what is right in our lives. The title of my article doesn’t say or even imply “perfect”. I’ve listed a number of reasons to be frustrated but I’ll take today to any time in the past . . . hands-down.
  11. Very nice post, di-fi. The spatialization point is one I find particularly seductive about even the two-channel version of this (and many other) Atmos albums. Joel
  12. Thanks for your assessment, PeterG. I don't recall whether I mentioned this in a previous post but I also purchased the DSD version of this album and still prefer the Atmos 2.0 version. Joel
  13. It's surprising to read comments predicting the demise of Atmos or its relegation solely to home theaters. It seems as if some are suggesting that if a technology won't be widely accepted, it won't be worth our time. We're in a nitch hobby. Does the average household have separate amplifiers, preamplifiers, dacs, streamers, etc.? Yet, many of us do. SACD's were never a universally accepted format and yet many of us still play and even rip them. The question is not whether a format will become popular with the masses but whether we can enjoy it. Ours is not a philosophizing hobby, it's an audio hobby. Listen and make your decision. Joel
  14. Thanks for taking the time to write your detailed impressions, austinpop. However, this is the danger of using only one sample to assess an entire format. It would be like assessing DSD vs. PCM based on only one track. If I didn't upload a sample track, people would just read about one man's impressions of Atmos 2.0. Not very satisfying. And by uploading not even one track but one minute of one track, the opportunity to assess an entire format is very limited. Your assessments may be spot on however, as with any other format, they'd be far more informed by hearing many more examples of Atmos 2.0. Not hearing those additional examples is not your fault of course. I hope you'll get to hear more Atmos 2.0 music. At the very least, one of the points of my article was to explain that enjoying Atmos does not require the major hardware investment that I assumed it did. As for the sound, it could very well be a matter of personal preference but I'm hooked. Thanks again for your post. Joel
×
×
  • Create New...