Thanks for the feedback! Totally understand, it's really impossible (and quite unfair) to ask someone to assess something like this over an online survey this vague. As you've pointed out, the best way to assess "high-end" is by sound quality (which we can't replicate here) or price, but I'd hate to bias the results of the survey since price is part of the survey. Suffice it to say that this system will be very comparable in sound quality to high-end consumer stereo systems and some professional setups.
We have a number of promising tech developments (wireless transmission that doesn't exhibit the loss in quality with compressed files, room correction that can be adjusted via software, etc), and are looking for feedback on what features people are willing to trade-off and at what value so we can appropriately focus our R&D on what matters to the end users the most.
