Jump to content

astonmartin56

  • Posts

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Country

    United States

Retained

  • Member Title
    Newbie
  1. Well I ended up ordering both the SBH80s and the Senns, and to my surprise the SBH80s really did give better overall isolation even compared to the Senns with active NC on (tested on the subway). I'm probably going to keep the Senns instead anyway though, mainly because they came with a nice case and I'm concerned about the long-term durability of the SBH80s.
  2. Yup, that first thread is how I found out about 'em. What I'd really like to know is whether they might isolate as well as or better than the Sennheisers (on-ear with active NC) I mentioned earlier. If so, that would be awesome, but I'm dubious that a (non-custom) IEM could compete. Any thoughts?
  3. Yeah, I'm sure that's true, but the convenience factor is more important to me for what I plan to be using these for.
  4. Thanks for the suggestion. Do you know if Shure (or anyone else) makes something with similarly good isolation but with Bluetooth? I'd been looking a bit at the Sony SBH80s, but I'm not convinced they'd provide enough isolation.
  5. I think I have to rule out any kind of custom IEMs for cost reasons. Is it worth considering non-custom IEMs, or should I just look for on-ear headphones?
  6. Thanks for the reply. The VE6s look great, but it looks like they're way out of my price range, unfortunately. Do you think there exist any IEMs in a price range similar to the QC15s/QC25s that could do something approaching as good a job as the QC15s in terms of isolation?
  7. I'd love to hear some discussion from you folks about active vs. passive noise canceling, especially with respect to compact headphones and IEMs. My understanding (from my experience with my Audio-Technica ATH-ANC7s) is that active NC is good at blocking continuous, low-frequency noise, but not very good at blocking irregular and/or higher-frequency noise -- like talking and some of the clatter on the subway. And, of course, you give up more (in cash or sound quality) for it. By way of context, I'm quite happy with my ANC7s and their active NC, but I'm looking for something more compact and with Bluetooth for use on the go in noisy environments, like airplanes and the subway. What I at first had in mind was something like Sennheiser's MM 450-Xs (foldable on-ear with Bluetooth and active NC), but I wanted to make sure I wasn't being too restrictive in my requirements. I figured I ought to consider sets like Bose's Soundlink On-Ear Bluetooth, which are similar but don't have active NC, in case their passive blocking was as good as or better than the Senns with active NC. And then I thought I should consider Bluetooth IEMs like Sony's SBH80s as well, in case they'd do even better at blocking with no need for active NC. So what I'd really like to know is how good purely passive NC can be in compact over-the-ear headphones or IEMs. Even my over-the-ear ANC7s don't passively block out that much, so I do rely on their active NC. Can I really expect something like those Bose ones to be so much better passively that I don't need active NC? Or, should I really be looking for good isolating Bluetooth IEMs, rather than at something like those Senns? My concern with IEMs is that they just wouldn’t be as good at blocking noise (actively or passively), as good in sound quality, and/or as durable (I've never owned a set where one ear didn't crap out after less than a year) as on-ear or over-the-ear sets for the same price. But maybe that's just because I've never owned actually good IEMs. I'm not necessarily looking for specific product recommendations, although I'd be happy to hear those too, but just in general discussion of this topic, as my experience with it is admittedly limited.
×
×
  • Create New...