digeri

Thank you for for supporting the basic notion that MusicGiants provides a great way to hear high resolution audio.<br /> <br /> I agree that people hear what they hear when they push play on their systems. You talk about k mixer. Everybody was thrilled when MSFT finally got to kill K-Mixer. It is not in Vista which is a much better listening platform than XP. When you get the time, I suggest you put vista on that boot camp machine.<br /> <br /> digeri<br /> <br />

When we compared the SACD on a Sony 777 to the MG files coming off an HP server, the differences were minuscule. The comments we got were that this is a great way for consumers to hear file based music, specially since the SACD disks are no longer available. I have no idea about how you did your tests, but I stand by my opinion that you did not do an apples to apples test.<br /> <br /> send me your 44,1 file and I will be happy to compare it to what we have here<br /> <br />

I am very familiar with this process and have to think that the 44.1 version you heard was not ripped from the SACD hybrid disk of Let It Bleed. What you are describing sounds like a CD version of this album made from an older CD which is not representative of what The Stones consider proper. Please compare the MusicGiants 88.2 version to the original 45 disk or the SACD version. The SACD was made to represent how these tunes sounded on their original release.<br /> <br /> We did compare all the current versions of 22 Stones albums to the MusicGiants files and they all compared favorably. This was done by a representative of ABKCO.<br /> <br /> digeri