Jump to content

Pelecoteco

  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Country

    country-ZZ

Retained

  • Member Title
    Newbie
  1. Mine is almost a zuma, it uses gigabyte z77 motherboard, with i5 underlocked @2Ghz, and some features disabled on Bios, it has 2 SSD 512GB inside and uses Linux. It consumes 20w in idle and 23W playing.
  2. That's Awesome! Could put some internal pictures and measure internal temperature of the processor in full load?
  3. But it is highly customizable, it may be much easier to adapt to an audiophile purpose than itunes and even easier than starting a UI from scratch. You can even install XBMC on a iPad/iPhone. But anyway, I think I'm becoming one of those people who are considering to lose some SQ for a better user interface.
  4. I tried to use the Itunes integration and the SQ is not the same. i think you don't have to much freedon working on itunes and there is no need to develop your own. What do you think to get attention on one of the best's user interfaces made, still free and very customizable: XBMC; Imagine an Ipad (or other external device) doing all the UI (nothing on the computer with audirvana) and just telling the next song to be played for the audirvana. regards
  5. I don't understand why we have to choose and we cant have both. Why we can not use the Ipad (or other device) to do all the processig of the interface, and the Ipad will only inform to the player the next song to be played. (nothing more)
  6. Hi, I realized that XBMC is way to advanced than itunes. (and suports Flac) Does anyone try to use audirvana as an external player on XBMC?
×
×
  • Create New...