Jump to content

Lashy

  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Country

    country-ZZ

Retained

  • Member Title
    Banned
  1. Your Dont know shit about music, then, you just like Big Boom BANG and Bass and shit ^^ haha you dont know how a real Electric guitar Amplified through Analogue means sounds, YOU KNOW that a Guitar uses Pickups, Not so weird why a Analogue Sound signal Using pickup catches this sound more correctly Then this Synthetic 1 - 0 system ;D Im done discussing with you, you dont know where im going with this.
  2. From Brothers in Arms they were, Their Album 1978 called Just " Dire straits " were Master tape 100 % analogue recorded, and Should be kept that way. And guess what, it sounds like real instruments, When they get to Brothers in arms fully digitally recorded, sounds like shit. Brothers in arms in SACD preferred. Dire straits on Vinyl preferred. Music that were Recorded 100 % analogue, should be kept that way. Digital sound fits Digital Music ye sure
  3. You seem like a very kind person, and it's also clear that your much wiser then myself. and you made me smile too That aside the Dac's im refering to are Some quite expensive ones, I know more then you think also, Your right about the super low Freq, and that the sound is alot clearer, BUT ! The Guitar's of Mark knophler is DEAD on Digital, on Vinyl They are Alive, you can hear what Amp Rack and Guitar he uses, and the Tones from his strings come alive, Im not making this up, On digital It sounds stupid and dead compared to Vinyl. The Deep deep Freq's and The Dynamic and Clarity of sound is better on Digital, we agree don't worry. But it's SUPER clear to my ears that Digital sound is Glued together by the DAC's Guessing game, and that the Vinyl Track is a perfect mirror of the True sound. i have some different DAC's CAMBRIDGE Azur 840C and M-audio Profire 2626 The Cambrigde is a Med-High end DAC in Hi-fi QUite expensive, My point is, that the problem is not that i haven't got the gear, iM even comparing a more expensive CD player with a Less expensive Turntable + Pickup So that Argument is Dead clearly I listened to Digital Sound the first 20 years of my life, and now i have listened to Analogue sound once in a while for like 5 months. So it's not a Nostalgic value either. AND YES, i would love to hear a a real master tape, but i haven't been that fortunate. I just know that The sound that comes out of my Marshall Rack on my Telecaster, I know this sound very well, and When this sound is Digitized it Sounds different, IT SOUNDS Thin and Fake and Like the warmth and the Endless details disapeer, But THe VINYL CAN ! Create ! the SoUND ! of the Marshall rack + the Telecaster. THEN it sounds like my Scanspeak Speakers suddenly are a True Marshal Amp PLEASE understand this. Btw Scanspeak units are some of the Worlds best MOST high end Most linear speakers on the market. So the problem lies not their either.
  4. I have listned to High end, Scanspeak speakers for many years with Pristine Class A amps, also listened to Tube amplifiers etc etc Super expensive stuff. But i gotta tell you, Music that havent been digitized sound so much richer, espeacilly in the 1 khz - 20 khz section, Voices and Guitars etc They sound soooo much better on Vinyl, It's not an Opinion, It's simply because it's a Perfect image of the Sound, Not a Synthetic Artificial product. Nobody would say otherwise, i can easily show them A / B test with Flac Files both 44.1 khz and 92 khz SACD Flac, and then the Vinyl. Nobody chooses Digital. People these days ... They cant hear a thing. Vinyl is not samples and bits, It's the real true Sound, But if you Enjoy listening to Techno and Synthetic music, Digital is ofcource the way, If you like the voices cloaked in auto tune and the Drums in MIDI synthetic crap, Digital is the way.
  5. im 20 years old, i can hear 20 khz' i have from 15 hz to 30 khz as Wave files, so this is easy for me to have tested. im not a very small child, and im not a cat. So their your wrong. Also when you talk about Sample Freq and Bit depth your so wrong you have no idea. a 20 khz sound is a vibration swinging 20.000 times per second, the DAC will only set 2 Points in those 20 k Swing's then Artificially it will create the sound pattern. That means 20000 swings per second, will get you 2 samples per second. ( in 44100 hz 16 bit ) you have no idea how much sound is lost, down in the most hear able spectrum of the sound 1 khz 1000 hz, you will only get 41.1 Samples per second, of those 1000 swings per second. Just picture yourself a waveform, a picture of sound, and then picture 1000 swings, then set 44.1 Points randomly, and draw straight lines from point to point, This is Digital sound, i guess you have never owned a super expensive Turn table with an insanely expensive pickup. Analogue sound have Each single detail in each single Freq. Infinite Samples each second, and Infinite Bit depth. Digital sound is uneven down in the low freq let's say 20 hz you will get a much more detailed sound since 20 hz will get 2205 Points ( samples ) in those 20 Swings, this means the 20 hz tone is not so much Artificial DAC sound. But in the light mid section 5 khz you will only get 8 Points ( samples ) in the Wave form. If we were to jump to something like 48 bit 192 khz a 1 khz freq would be sampled roughly 192 times per second, Even if it made 1000 Samples per second of a 1000 hz freq. it would still Not make the 100 % correct sound like the Analogue Master tape. people are so deaf these days, enjoying their Ipods and mp3, CD and DVD audio / SA-CD sad Formats, more then 99 % of the sound is artificial created by the DAC, where the last 1 % is those samples it took from the Real source Material the few samples haha ^^
×
×
  • Create New...