Results 1 to 25 of 25
Thread: Peachtree Grand Integrated
-
02-23-2012, 12:31 AM #1Sophomore Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Location
- NYC
- Posts
- 180
Peachtree Grand Integrated
I heard this fairly new piece of equipment last week playing cd from a Rega player and connected to Maggie 1.7's. Very pleasing system.
I think these all in one type integrated amps with internal dacs will appeal to some non-audiophiles looking for excellent sound in an easy space saving package and will help drive computer audio increasingly into the mainstream.
While $5000 is not cheap, it's probably not crazy for what the peachtree unit does, and the peachtree unit compared quite favorably to the Wadia 151 (which I own), albeit for an additional $4000.
- Mark
Home: Headless Mac Mini (2.53 GHz, 8gb ram, Intel X-25 ssd, Core Audio Technology Kalos SE Power Supply, Shunyata Anaconda Alpha Helix power cord, Pure Music) > Locus Cynosure USB > dCS Vivaldi DAC (David Elrod Statement Gold power cord) > Nordost Valhalla xlr > VTL 7.5 III (Nordost Valhalla power cord) > Nordost Valhalla xlr > VTL MB-450 III (Shunyata King Cobra CX power cords) > Nordost Valhalla shotgun spades > Magico Q3/Rel Studio III.
Power Conditioning: Shunyata Hydra Triton + Typhoon (Shunyata-Anaconda ZiTron umbilical/Shunyata King Cobra CX power cord/) > Furutec GTX D-Rhodium AC outlet.
Office: Sonos P90/Wadia i171 (Audience Power Cord e) > Veloce Black Cat > Monarchy DIP (Audience Power Cord e) > Veloce Black Cat > Wadia 151 PowerDac (Audience Power Cord e) > Audience e24 > Dynaudio X12 and Rel T5 (Audience Power Cord e) - PS Audio P300 (Audience Power Cord e).
Headphone: Woo Audio WA5-LE (Purist Audio Venustas rca/Nordost Valhalla power cord) > Audeze LCD 3 (Moon Audio Silver Dragon)/Senheiser HD800 (Cardas Headphone Cable)
Portable: iPod Classic > ALO Audio LOD > Cypher Labs AlgoRythym Solo > ALO Audio LOD > ALO The Continental II > Ultrasone Edition 8 (Moon Audio Silverdragon)/Ultimate Ears 18 (Moon Audio Silverdragon).
-
02-23-2012, 06:19 AM #2
Why not audiophiles?
No appeal to audiophiles? Because it is a one box solution?
I understand that some people want to choose and match separates; but audiophiles shouldn't reject one box solutions out of hand. There is no reason to think that something like the grand integrated couldn't sound much better than separates that total anywhere near its' price. It is 4 devices in one box, after all.
If that's true, then there aren't such good reasons to prefer separates, other than some entrenched audiophile prejudices.
System (in small home office): GIK Acoustics Room Treatments>Tranquil Fanless PC with Windows 7(Dual Core Atom Board)>JRiver MC >FW to Mytek 192 DSD Stereo DAC >ClassDaudio SDS-470 amp >Devore Gibbon Nines. Also own: Squeezebox Touch slaved to an Empirical Audio Pace Car; a standard SB Touch; Squeezebox Boom. Dual 506 TT, Ortofon M20 (used only for recording vinyl) MF X-DAC3; MF X-150 Amp;Goldpoint passive pre.
-
02-23-2012, 06:26 AM #3Trouble maker...
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Middle Earth... sorry mean Middle of England.
- Posts
- 5,338
Not what was written...
With respect firedog, "appeal to some non-audiophiles" is not the same as "[of] no appeal to audiophiles".
Eloise
Big change... Simplified solution...
VortexBox ----> Squeezebox --SPDIF--> Arcam ----> B&W CDM7 NT
-
02-24-2012, 07:39 AM #4
okay
Eloise, you are correct. But it can't be denied that many audiophiles reject electronics that aren't separates as a matter of course.
System (in small home office): GIK Acoustics Room Treatments>Tranquil Fanless PC with Windows 7(Dual Core Atom Board)>JRiver MC >FW to Mytek 192 DSD Stereo DAC >ClassDaudio SDS-470 amp >Devore Gibbon Nines. Also own: Squeezebox Touch slaved to an Empirical Audio Pace Car; a standard SB Touch; Squeezebox Boom. Dual 506 TT, Ortofon M20 (used only for recording vinyl) MF X-DAC3; MF X-150 Amp;Goldpoint passive pre.
-
02-24-2012, 07:57 AM #5Pseudo Journalist
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- Frederick, Maryland, United States
- Posts
- 1,221
- Blog Entries
- 41
Preferred
I actually prefer an integrated. Not as useful to a reviewer, but to a consumer, they offer a chance to be far more affordable. One less power cord, one less interconnect, no issues about synergy or system matching. Skadoosh.
I think the new Peachtrees are very interesting, but I think what's more objectionable to the audiophile is the fact that they're Class D. And EVERYONE KNOWS that Class D sucks. Rolled bass, rolled highs, "digital sounding", blah blah blah.
And this is why the Peachtree is interesting. They use the new B&O "X-modules" that, to all reports, sound quite different from your run-of-the-mill Class D amps (whatever that would be).
I heard the Grand Integrated at RMAF, running a pair of big Sonus Faber speakers, and I was quite taken with the sound. Big, expansive, powerful, dynamic, blah blah blah. Everything I expected those big speakers to sound like, well, they did.
I'd love to get my greedy little mitts on one, actually. I bet it'd drive the piss out of my big Maggies.
-
04-24-2012, 12:11 AM #6Newbie
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Posts
- 4
Im also interested in Peachtree grand integrated, Anyone actually has any opinion , personal experience, AB comparison ?
-
04-24-2012, 12:17 AM #7
I had an in home Demo of a Grand Pre, I ordered one at the end of the Demo. The Pre and Integrated are very closely related.
Here is the thread I started: http://www.computeraudiophile.com/th...tree-Grand-Pre"People don't want to hear the truth because they don't want their illusions destroyed." Frederich Neitzsche.
-
04-24-2012, 12:31 AM #8
-
04-24-2012, 12:38 AM #9Newbie
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Posts
- 4
I actually have read your thread multiple times, it may be the only legit review online ( that I know of) , Considering the fact that its a sold out product and you should preorder it , its strange that there are not more reviews out there.
I was wondering how it compare to other DACs like Berkeley Audio Alpha DAC or other worthy DACS.
I was also wondering how Amp performs specially with more demanding speakers and higher end speakers which reveal even small audio imperfections.
Thank you anyway.
-
04-24-2012, 12:48 AM #10
You may have seen this already, but just incase here it is: http://www.computeraudiophile.com/co...011-Show-Notes
"People don't want to hear the truth because they don't want their illusions destroyed." Frederich Neitzsche.
-
04-24-2012, 07:21 AM #11----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
computer > tangled wads of wire > DAC/pre > more tangled wads of wire > amp >yet more tangled wads of wire > speakers
-
04-24-2012, 07:27 AM #12
Class D
I think they took a really bold leap doing this, and I think people will eventually come around to recognizing that having an energy-efficient amp that sounds good is a very sound investment (pun intended). Having an amp that doesn't melt the glass on the front of my cabinet, and consumes electricity sparingly, is as important to me as good sound. If this sounds as good as my Class D amp, I would be happy, but my guess is that it is much better (after all, it wasn't assembled by an incompetent like me).
I look to Peachtree as a company that will dominate the "sane" high-end audio market.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
computer > tangled wads of wire > DAC/pre > more tangled wads of wire > amp >yet more tangled wads of wire > speakers
-
04-25-2012, 04:12 PM #13Newbie
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Posts
- 10
Peachtree Grand Integrated is Awesome
I'm running the Peachtree GI to drive a pair of Joseph Audio Pulsars with superb result. It is very musical. After some breaking in it soudns better than my previous w4s dac-2 and aesthetix combo. I contacted Peachtree and they said the GI use the 'ASX-2' B&O module.
-
04-30-2012, 01:30 AM #14Sophomore Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Posts
- 402
Peachtree USB...
Does anyone find it odd that the Peachtree Grand Pre & Grand Integrated require a Mac driver? For Windows, I can understand. It's Windows. But, for Mac? Shouldn't a DAC in this day be plug & play with OS X? If I understand correctly, wouldn't the inclusion of USB Audio Class 2.0 have eliminated the need for drivers? Are these new PT USB DACs already a bit dated for 2012? Major oversight by PT, or am I way off?
-
04-30-2012, 04:43 AM #15Sophomore Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Posts
- 402
-
05-14-2012, 03:27 PM #16
Hi chg - The internal USB to SPDIF converter we chose for the Grand Series unfortunately requires drivers. We chose it because it's the one we liked the sound of best. At the time there wasn't a plug and play solution that we liked as well so we decided to suffer through the driver necessity. We are working on a driverless plug and play solution for Grand that should be done by the fall, maybe a bit sooner.
-
05-14-2012, 03:29 PM #17
-
05-14-2012, 03:34 PM #18
-
05-14-2012, 11:23 PM #19Sophomore Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Posts
- 402
Hi Jon- Thanks for the reply.
"Grand Series is assembled in the U.S.A. although parts like the chassis and tube buffer are made in the P.R.C."
That's certainly acceptable. Glad to hear.
I saw this discussed on another post as well, so I'll just steal his question.
"If that happens, will I need a new device? Will it be upgradeable? Or will it be a software update?"
One other question I have is will the Grand series ever be available in black?
Thanks!
-
05-15-2012, 12:47 PM #20
Peachtree Grand Integrated
It will be upgradable. I'm not sure yet if it will be hardware or software based but existing owners will definitely be able to update/upgrade their units when it is made available.
No plans for black.
-
05-15-2012, 12:57 PM #21
-
05-15-2012, 03:24 PM #22----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
computer > tangled wads of wire > DAC/pre > more tangled wads of wire > amp >yet more tangled wads of wire > speakers
-
01-25-2013, 02:08 AM #23Freshman Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Munich, Bavaria
- Posts
- 54
Hi Guys,
any owner here who have replaced their existing Grand Pre / Integrated Tenor USB board with the new XMOS board ? Will it improve sound quality or is it just an improvement in terms of driverless Mac connectivity ? The replacement is unfortunately not just a plug and play procedure as additional soldering work is necessary on the mainboard as well.
Thanks in advance
Tom
-
01-25-2013, 10:24 AM #24
HI there. I actually spoke to Jon Derda himself in person just a few days ago about this because my Grand Pre has not been upgraded yet. I was hesitant because I did not know if the change would affect the sound. According to Jon the switch to the XMOS board does in fact change the sound but just slightly. The changes are, according to Jon, that the sound becomes a bit more natural and the highs lose some "zip" while remaining very natural and great sounding."People don't want to hear the truth because they don't want their illusions destroyed." Frederich Neitzsche.
-
01-25-2013, 02:20 PM #25Freshman Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Munich, Bavaria
- Posts
- 54
Many thanks for your feedback. Not sure if these slight improvements are worth the 300 EUROs.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote





