Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Site Founder The Computer Audiophile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN, USA
    Posts
    12,017

    Your security preferences allow installation of only apps from the Mac App Store and identified developers.

    Hi Guys - I mentioned this in the Mountain Lion thread but want to create a different topic for it that's simple to find without wading through that whole thread. When installing apps on Mountain Lion OS X 10.8 you may see an error or message that says the following ->

    Your security preferences allow installation of only apps from the Mac App Store and identified developers.

    By default Apple has changed the security settings to only allow installation of apps from the Mac App Store and identified developers. To change this permanently or temporarily go to System Preferences > Security & Privacy. On the General Tab click the little lock in the lower left corner to unlock the general preference pane. Then select the Anywhere radio button beneath Allow applications downloaded from: Here are a couple screenshots.







    Chris Connaker

    Founder
    Computer Audiophile

    Listening Room | System Details

  2. #2
    Thanks dude - you rock like Table Mountain

  3. #3
    Sophomore Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    New York area
    Posts
    139

    right-click to install unidentified apps

    Personally I would not recommend setting the security preference to "Anywhere." For those new to OS X Mountain Lion and Mavericks, it's very easy to deal with apps from unidentified developers on a case-by-case basis, so why make your Mac less safe? Just right-click on the installer and choose "Open" in the pop-up window. More info here:

    Safely Install Non-Mac App Store Apps On Your Mac [OS X Tips] | Cult of Mac

    I don't know if there has been a dangerous app released for the Mac recently, but I'd rather keep that extra step active. Macs are much safer than PCs, but a few years ago there was something called MacDefender that infected Macs and caused us to feel a little less smug or superior about security.

    MacDefender Scareware Linked to Russian Payment Site | News & Opinion | PCMag.com
    Mac Mini, Pure Music, iTunes, Bel Canto DAC2.5 with Bel Canto interface, Bel Canto 500s amp, Phil Jones Platinum Reference One speakers.

  4. #4
    Newbie Objectionist wgscott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Gondwana
    Posts
    8,807
    Blog Entries
    41
    As with TSA, and the NSA, it has very little to do with your safety, and very much to do with social control.

    For even more fun, try to get Gui scripting to work.
    Living Room: 2012 i7 Mac mini --> Halide Bridge-->Peachtree Nova --> Class D Audio 254 X 2 --> B&W CM7R + Rel R218
    (iTunes | Audirvana | BitPerfect | Decibel ) & Dirac
    iTunes on remote computer controls Audirvana on server

    Home Office: 2007 iMac --> Vanatoo powered speakers (iTunes | Audirvana | BitPerfect | Decibel )

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Señor, señor, let's disconnect these cables
    Overturn these tables
    This place don't make sense to me no more.

  5. #5
    Site Founder The Computer Audiophile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN, USA
    Posts
    12,017
    Quote Originally Posted by eatapc View Post
    Personally I would not recommend setting the security preference to "Anywhere." For those new to OS X Mountain Lion and Mavericks, it's very easy to deal with apps from unidentified developers on a case-by-case basis, so why make your Mac less safe? Just right-click on the installer and choose "Open" in the pop-up window. More info here:

    Safely Install Non-Mac App Store Apps On Your Mac [OS X Tips] | Cult of Mac

    I don't know if there has been a dangerous app released for the Mac recently, but I'd rather keep that extra step active. Macs are much safer than PCs, but a few years ago there was something called MacDefender that infected Macs and caused us to feel a little less smug or superior about security.

    MacDefender Scareware Linked to Russian Payment Site | News & Opinion | PCMag.com
    If you're going to right-click and select Open anyway, why not just enable the Anywhere setting? A username and password must be entered to install software as well. This setting really isn't protecting anyone. Maybe it's pushing people toward the App Store where Apple collects a percentage of sales?
    Chris Connaker

    Founder
    Computer Audiophile

    Listening Room | System Details

  6. #6
    Newbie Objectionist wgscott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Gondwana
    Posts
    8,807
    Blog Entries
    41
    Quote Originally Posted by The Computer Audiophile View Post
    Maybe it's pushing people toward the App Store where Apple collects a percentage of sales?
    Exactly.

    It is a real kick in the teeth to Free and Open-Source software distributors, not only because it makes this stuff harder to install, but it creates a suspicion amongst the potential user community that open-source software is more dangerous (the opposite is typically true) and something you should distrust. (We see that a lot on CA anyway -- look at the paranoia about Audacity). Finally, Apple charges a $100/year ransom for so-called code-signing, that allows a distributor to go through the Apple-approved channels. If you are distributing something for free, you shouldn't have to pay out of your own pocket to do so. It will help to kill OS X as a viable unix computer platform if they persist in this direction.

    I don't know if this is post Steve Jobs, but it seems Apple has lost sight of the horizon; they seem intent on making my iMac into a sessile iPad on a stick.
    Living Room: 2012 i7 Mac mini --> Halide Bridge-->Peachtree Nova --> Class D Audio 254 X 2 --> B&W CM7R + Rel R218
    (iTunes | Audirvana | BitPerfect | Decibel ) & Dirac
    iTunes on remote computer controls Audirvana on server

    Home Office: 2007 iMac --> Vanatoo powered speakers (iTunes | Audirvana | BitPerfect | Decibel )

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Señor, señor, let's disconnect these cables
    Overturn these tables
    This place don't make sense to me no more.

  7. #7
    Sophomore Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    New York area
    Posts
    139
    I agree with your reasoning, Chris, but here's my alternate rationale: I want to know when an app is from an unidentified developer. When I'm forced to right-click on an app to open the installer, it makes me think twice. In the last two years I've declined to install only two apps after finding that a right-click was necessary, but I like to be alerted. In one case, I researched the app again and ultimately went ahead with the install; in the other case I decided I didn't want to do it.

    I have never been pushed to the Apple store because of this security measure, and I've never been discouraged from buying the apps I need outside of Apple's "clutches." As a professional video editor with an audio hobby, I find there are many apps I can't live without that are not available on the App Store; the existence of the App Store in no way discourages those purchases.

    I knew about the right-click thing before I even installed Mountain Lion because the developers of several apps I own sent e-mail notices to registered users. It was also much talked about in the build-up to Mountain Lion's release, and all the reviewers talked about "Gatekeeper" at the time of release. Most developers, including those who choose not to sell through the App Store (for good reasons), are generally OK with Apple's Gatekeeper. This was typical of the developer talk at the time of Mountain Lion:

    What Developers Think About Mountain Lion's Gatekeeper

    Of course, there's a legitimate debate about whether Apple is greedily trying to force developers to sell through the App Store or whether this is a legitimate security policy. To me it's pretty obvious: both!
    Mac Mini, Pure Music, iTunes, Bel Canto DAC2.5 with Bel Canto interface, Bel Canto 500s amp, Phil Jones Platinum Reference One speakers.

  8. #8
    Newbie Objectionist wgscott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Gondwana
    Posts
    8,807
    Blog Entries
    41


    This isn't exactly a judgement-free neutral heads-up.

    cf: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/0...open-platforms
    Living Room: 2012 i7 Mac mini --> Halide Bridge-->Peachtree Nova --> Class D Audio 254 X 2 --> B&W CM7R + Rel R218
    (iTunes | Audirvana | BitPerfect | Decibel ) & Dirac
    iTunes on remote computer controls Audirvana on server

    Home Office: 2007 iMac --> Vanatoo powered speakers (iTunes | Audirvana | BitPerfect | Decibel )

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Señor, señor, let's disconnect these cables
    Overturn these tables
    This place don't make sense to me no more.

  9. #9
    Sophomore Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Southeastern Pennsylvania
    Posts
    184
    The funniest thing of all is that when I tried to install Filemaker Pro I got the message that the program was from an unrecognized source. Apple owns Filemaker!
    Mac mini (late 2012, 2.3GHz i7 quad-core, 16 Gb), Pure Music, Ayre QB-9DSD, Mark Levinson 380S, Classe CA-M300 (pair), B&W Nautilus 801, RealTraps acoustic treatments

  10. #10
    Sophomore Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    New York area
    Posts
    139
    That article contains an important qualifier: "reportedly." Turned out to be wrong, didn't it? It was written about 5 months before Mountain Lion was released; the warning was in an early developer version.

    Apple makes it very pretty easy for developers to be included in the "identified developer" category. Adium, in fact, installs fine without a change to the Security default settings. I'm finding that fewer and fewer app installers require a right-click to open; if a right-click is required, it takes an extra two seconds. Not a big deal.

    I think it was valuable for Chris to point out the issue and provide a solution for people new to OS X 10.8 or 10.9. I just wanted to add that there is an alternative method for installing apps from unidentified developers that doesn't involve disabling Apple's security preferences.
    Mac Mini, Pure Music, iTunes, Bel Canto DAC2.5 with Bel Canto interface, Bel Canto 500s amp, Phil Jones Platinum Reference One speakers.

  11. #11
    Sophomore Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    New York area
    Posts
    139
    Quote Originally Posted by Axiom05 View Post
    The funniest thing of all is that when I tried to install Filemaker Pro I got the message that the program was from an unrecognized source. Apple owns Filemaker!
    That's hilarious. Go figure. When Mountain Lion came out I read that versions 11 and 12 of Filemaker Pro produced the warning; Filemaker posted the workaround for its users who were reinstalling on 10.8. Is that still true with the current version?!!!
    Mac Mini, Pure Music, iTunes, Bel Canto DAC2.5 with Bel Canto interface, Bel Canto 500s amp, Phil Jones Platinum Reference One speakers.

  12. #12
    Sophomore Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Southeastern Pennsylvania
    Posts
    184
    Quote Originally Posted by eatapc View Post
    That's hilarious. Go figure. When Mountain Lion came out I read that versions 11 and 12 of Filemaker Pro produced the warning; Filemaker posted the workaround for its users who were reinstalling on 10.8. Is that still true with the current version?!!!
    This happened with the latest version, Filemaker Pro 13, last December and using OSX 10.8.5.
    Mac mini (late 2012, 2.3GHz i7 quad-core, 16 Gb), Pure Music, Ayre QB-9DSD, Mark Levinson 380S, Classe CA-M300 (pair), B&W Nautilus 801, RealTraps acoustic treatments