Results 1 to 17 of 17
Thread: Different NAS, different sound.
-
04-18-2012, 12:21 AM #1
Different NAS, different sound.
Dear all,
I am currently partnering a Naim ND5 XS streamer with a Synology NAS. Till a few days ago, the music was streamed from the latest two-bay NAS from Synology (DS712) and I am quite happy about its performance of the NAS and the sound generated from this system. The 712 features a 1.8GHz Atom processor with 1G RAM and it is targeted for the use by small to medium sized enterprise.
Convinced that the 712 may be a bit “over-qualified” for the streaming job alone, I recently swapped the 712 with another older model from Synology – DS209. I used the 209 for more than 2 years and it only has a 800MHz processor and 512M RAM. After such a change, the sound generated from my system immediately becomes rather dull and the sound stage shrinks.
Given the fact my setup remains essentially the same (i.e. lan cable, router, ND5 XS, amplifier, interconnects and speakers), I am puzzled by this phenomenon as the only variable is the NAS itself together with its stock transformer. Logically, so long as my old NAS or my new one is capable of streaming the raw music data (i.e. without processing, I suppose) through the ethernet port to my Naim for decoding, the sound generated should be the same. Frankly, I did not expect such a vast difference between the new model and its dated sibling, both from the same manufacturer.
This really begs the question: does the specification (processing power and RAM size), make or model (e.g. single-bay or multi-bay) of the NAS affect the sound quality generated by a streamer? I would be grateful if any member can share his/her view.
Many thanks.
-
04-25-2012, 05:41 PM #2Sophomore Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Posts
- 128
Higo,
From what I have seen the transfer speed of the NAS can affect the sound. In my tests the faster the better. I didnt get to test a a bunch of NAS drives or any super speedy drives, so I don't know if there is a point of diminishing returns regarding transfer speed. But, I did notice SQ differences between the slow and medium speed drives.
I don't know the exact reason. Maybe the host computer needs to spend more CPU caching slower NAS drives. The more you take the CPU from music playback the worse the timing is which can lead to a dull sound.
-
04-26-2012, 04:05 AM #3Propeller headed robotic parody of someone's idea of an inhuman objectivist
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Location
- Amsterdam
- Posts
- 3,121
- Blog Entries
- 3
Julf
"I believe in evidence. I believe in observation, measurement, and reasoning, confirmed by independent observers. I'll believe anything, no matter how wild and ridiculous, if there is evidence for it. The wilder and more ridiculous something is, however, the firmer and more solid the evidence will have to be." - Isaac Asimov
-
04-26-2012, 12:30 PM #4Newbie
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Posts
- 3
Interested in All Your Answers
I've been researching NAS choices for several months and narrowed it down to the Synology DS-212j or a cheaper Buffalo Linkstation - both would be 2TB. But if I go with the Synology I would like to know the brand/model/specs of the drives you have chosen to use. Were they the same when you went from the 712 to the 209. I would be sourcing wirelessly to an Oppo over a Netgear router. I may be overthinking the drive requirements but this thread has caused me to think maybe not.
Thanks,
HookedOnAudioHarmon-Kardon Signature 2.0/Oppo BDP-93/Fosgate Audionics 4125 Power Amp/Klipsch KLF-20/Velodyne Sub
-
04-27-2012, 04:46 AM #5
Nas
I am using a ximeta NDAS device but it seems to me that if you load your music into memory before playing, an option with JRiver Media Centre, the speed of the device should not really matter.
-
04-27-2012, 07:12 AM #6
In this specific instance, the speed of the NAS and your network can cause some issues, such as a delay between tracks. Annoying, especially when it plays gaps between gapless tracks. Though, I have not heard a sonic difference once it starts playing on our systems.
Main Music: AIFF Library -> Mac Mini i5 (Late 2012) -> MacOS 10.8.3 -> JRMC 18 -> Siltech Optical -> Jolida Tube DAC II -> Parasound M2100 Preamp -> Outlaw Audio M2200 Monos -> Nodost Flatline MKII Speaker cables -> PSB Synchrony 1Bs on 36" stands
Vinyl -> Audio Technica LP120 w/ AT440MLa cart installed -> Phono input on Parasound M2100
Video -> NAD 557 Bluray + Apple TV 3g -> NAD T747 -> Preouts -> Parasound M2100 HT Bypass -> same as music
Bedroom -> Macbook Pro -> JRMC18 -> Peachtree DAC*IT -> NAD B33326 -> PSB Imagine Bs
Office -> Mac Mini i5 -> Amarra -> Kimber USB -> Wavelength Proton -> Creek e50 -> Maggie MMGs
-
04-27-2012, 08:28 AM #7Propeller headed robotic parody of someone's idea of an inhuman objectivist
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Location
- Amsterdam
- Posts
- 3,121
- Blog Entries
- 3
Julf
"I believe in evidence. I believe in observation, measurement, and reasoning, confirmed by independent observers. I'll believe anything, no matter how wild and ridiculous, if there is evidence for it. The wilder and more ridiculous something is, however, the firmer and more solid the evidence will have to be." - Isaac Asimov
-
04-27-2012, 11:00 AM #8
It does not appear to, or rather, it doesn't appear to preload the next track while the current track is playing.
I am not sure exactly what JRMC 17 is doing, but I have documented that any delay from the network or NAS in providing the next track results in several seconds of delay while it loads the file. At least in version 17. I would expect to see the same thing from USB drives that spin down when not being used, but haven't tested that yet.
-PaulMain Music: AIFF Library -> Mac Mini i5 (Late 2012) -> MacOS 10.8.3 -> JRMC 18 -> Siltech Optical -> Jolida Tube DAC II -> Parasound M2100 Preamp -> Outlaw Audio M2200 Monos -> Nodost Flatline MKII Speaker cables -> PSB Synchrony 1Bs on 36" stands
Vinyl -> Audio Technica LP120 w/ AT440MLa cart installed -> Phono input on Parasound M2100
Video -> NAD 557 Bluray + Apple TV 3g -> NAD T747 -> Preouts -> Parasound M2100 HT Bypass -> same as music
Bedroom -> Macbook Pro -> JRMC18 -> Peachtree DAC*IT -> NAD B33326 -> PSB Imagine Bs
Office -> Mac Mini i5 -> Amarra -> Kimber USB -> Wavelength Proton -> Creek e50 -> Maggie MMGs
-
04-28-2012, 06:10 AM #9Propeller headed robotic parody of someone's idea of an inhuman objectivist
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Location
- Amsterdam
- Posts
- 3,121
- Blog Entries
- 3
Julf
"I believe in evidence. I believe in observation, measurement, and reasoning, confirmed by independent observers. I'll believe anything, no matter how wild and ridiculous, if there is evidence for it. The wilder and more ridiculous something is, however, the firmer and more solid the evidence will have to be." - Isaac Asimov
-
04-29-2012, 10:02 AM #10
I think it has much more to do with what UPnP server you are using with either NAS and if the UPnP server is packaged into the NAS which version is it.
You don't say what software you are using and that would be helpful to know. The one that is packaged into the Synology DS712 looks bare bones to me and I would look into Asset or Twonky to get better performance.David
-
04-29-2012, 10:22 AM #11
I use a Synology DS410 (4 bay) and stay far far away from any app on the NAS, UPnP or otherwise. I use the NAS purely as a gigabit storage device for my music server (Mac Mini or Auraliti PK90USB, although latter is not hooked to NAS yet until next MPD build). Make sure your data path is 100% gigabit (router, any switches, etc) if worried about bandwidth.
The sonics of various UPnP software vary quite a bit, but most-if-not-all of them that are included NAS apps are detrimental to the sound. I put Synology's iTunes server in that category too."We're all bozos on this bus"....F.T.
-
04-29-2012, 10:25 AM #12Propeller headed robotic parody of someone's idea of an inhuman objectivist
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Location
- Amsterdam
- Posts
- 3,121
- Blog Entries
- 3
Julf
"I believe in evidence. I believe in observation, measurement, and reasoning, confirmed by independent observers. I'll believe anything, no matter how wild and ridiculous, if there is evidence for it. The wilder and more ridiculous something is, however, the firmer and more solid the evidence will have to be." - Isaac Asimov
-
04-29-2012, 10:39 AM #13
-
04-29-2012, 10:51 AM #14Propeller headed robotic parody of someone's idea of an inhuman objectivist
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Location
- Amsterdam
- Posts
- 3,121
- Blog Entries
- 3
Julf
"I believe in evidence. I believe in observation, measurement, and reasoning, confirmed by independent observers. I'll believe anything, no matter how wild and ridiculous, if there is evidence for it. The wilder and more ridiculous something is, however, the firmer and more solid the evidence will have to be." - Isaac Asimov
-
12-08-2012, 04:40 PM #15Newbie
- Join Date
- Dec 2012
- Posts
- 1
I also have an ND5 XS and I have been researching NAS drives/servers. I would like to take my computer out of the loop when I sit down to listen and rely only on the nStream Naim app on my iPad. Hence, I need a media streamer that runs appropriate software locally. After unsuccessfully attempting to use a Drobo FS and a WD MyBook Live Duo, I have been looking into something like the Synology DS412+. I am worried by some of the posts above indicating that the media server software available to run on the Synology is inadequate. I believe Naim calls out Synology as a recommended NAS option. Can you confirm what software you were using when you realized your original observations in your post?
-
12-09-2012, 04:46 AM #16Trouble maker...
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Middle Earth... sorry mean Middle of England.
- Posts
- 5,320
No one has recommended it so far: so I'll add the suggestion of using a Vortexbox.org device to provide server duties to your Naim ND5.
-
12-10-2012, 09:22 PM #17Sophomore Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Posts
- 254
Question: Are you using the same harddisks in both the two NAS?
I use a 1812+, and find the sonics pretty poor actually (versus internal drives), so I only use it for movies.
LinkBacks (?)
-
06-11-2012, 01:59 PM



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote





