Home

CA Sponsors

 

Ping Me In iTunes

         cash                    cash

         hrx                    jrmc

AppleTV as Music Server?

Aside from the small HD, which can be upgraded, is there any serious downside to using an AppleTV as a music server?

I know they can hook into music streamed from elsewhere, but you can put music files directly on their local HD, too, right?

__________________

MacBook Pro -> Airport Express -> Rotel RSP-1570 -> Martin Logan Sequels
MacBook Pro -> Icon HDP -> AKG K701
Apple Lossless all the way

The Computer Audiophile's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

Hi watchnerd - You can certainly do this but I think it's kind of awkward without hacking the Apple TV. You can't just copy music to it like a network disk, you have to sync it with one library or link to another library from the unit. Apple TV has resolution limitations as well.

Instead of storing your music on the ATV you can always use it like AirTunes and just pipe your music over to the ATV via another computer. Still have limitations but is another option.

Many people are using the ATV and they absolutely love it, so I say go for it!

__________________

Chris Connaker

Founder
Computer Audiophile

 
watchnerd's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

Syncing it is fine if it ultimately ends up with files being stored on the ATV itself, then played via a digital out of the ATV into my main home theatre system.

What I'm not real keen on is streaming audio real time during playback over wireless as I have a lot of interference that makes for spotty wifi at times.

Can you use 'regular' iTunes with the ATV, or is it limited to a Front Row like experience?

__________________

MacBook Pro -> Airport Express -> Rotel RSP-1570 -> Martin Logan Sequels
MacBook Pro -> Icon HDP -> AKG K701
Apple Lossless all the way

 
u72's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

Hi, I Currently use an Apple TV for my main system - and I find it works very well.
I Sync my iMac to the apple TV (only the albums I want/Need access to :D) and use the ATV as
a Stand alone Music Server - I Also Use my iPhone as a remote which is well worth doing
as apples remote constantly gets lost! :)
anyway heres a breakdown of my system if you've any questions - fire away! :)

22" Samsung Monitor (£199 PC World) with HDMI to DVI Lead
AppleTV (Fitted with a 250gig HD with Lossless albums, Latest 2.1 Firmware)
Marantz KI63 Mk2 (Ten Years young! )
Altmann DAC (With Paul Hynes PSU)
EAR 834T Amp (now upgraded to Border Patrol P20 :D )
ProAc D38 Speakers

Cables are:
Chord Sig Digital
Chord Sig Interconnects
Chord Sig Speaker Cables
Nordost White Light Glass Optical (Apple TV to DAC)

Rack is Sound Organization - spiked and Currently sitting
on two Large Slate Slabs I used to have my Speakers on - But I Didn't like what it did to the Sound so They're Parked under the Rack :)

The Sound Panels are Swedish Snow Crash 'Lunas' - They have really sorted the Bass Problem out that I was Having!

I listen to a Very Wide Selection of Music from 70'/80's/Pop/Rock/Jazz to Modern House/Electronic/Rock & Pop

Sound Quality is very nice - and the Altmann 'De-Jitter' Circuit seems to Work well, The Apple TV is a great solution as a jukebox
cheap too - £100ish ebay second hand and £58 for the new 250 HD! ;)

http://img180.imageshack.us/img180/1641/dsc01744xw4.jpg

http://img301.imageshack.us/img301/1113/dsc01751md5.jpg

http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/2827/dsc01750hl2.jpg

__________________

u72/Andy

Current Setup
iMac/Apple TV/Marantz KI 63mkII > Altmann Attraction DAC (Turbo'd) > Border Patrol CU (Turbo'd) > Border Patrol P20 > ProAc D38

 
The Computer Audiophile's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

Very nice system thanks for posting the pics and your experience with the Apple TV. Every opinion helps others make decisions!

__________________

Chris Connaker

Founder
Computer Audiophile

 
watchnerd's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

Thanks much for the detailed reply.

When compared to using a Mac Mini or MacBook Pro, what are the relatives advantages and disadvantages of using AppleTV as a music server?

__________________

MacBook Pro -> Airport Express -> Rotel RSP-1570 -> Martin Logan Sequels
MacBook Pro -> Icon HDP -> AKG K701
Apple Lossless all the way

 
u72's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

Hi Watchnerd,

Advantages : -
Cost £100ish secondhand for 40GB version (Upgradable quite easily to a current max of 250GB HD)
Power Consumption is Very Low
Quiet
Small and can be completely hidden if you use the wireless iPhone/iPod Touch option rather than apple Inferred Remote
If You use an iphone/ipodtouch you don't even need a monitor :)
Passes Bit Perfect Data to an external DAC via Optical (This is the Option I Use)
Keeps you Music collection nice and organized using iTunes (With artwork)
You can use it as a Divx player once hacked (With AC3 DD5.1 Passthough)
no keyboard/mouse required
no powerbrick (mains plugs straight in)

Disadvantages : -
No Inbuilt CD/DVD Drive
Not Quite as Flexable as a full blown MACmini/Macbook - but these cost quite a bit more.
no keyboard/mouse - you'll have to edit your music library on a PC/Mac

anyway, its late i'll add a few more tomorrow, heres a list of links to hack an ATV :)

http://scan.co.uk/Product.aspx?WebProductId=736213 << link to the 250GB HD I Used
http://www.macworld.com/article/57079/2007/03/appletvharddrive.html << How to open ATV
http://diyspirit.com/2008/06/easier-way-to-upgrade-your-apple-tv-hard-dr... << a good tutorial on upgrading

__________________

u72/Andy

Current Setup
iMac/Apple TV/Marantz KI 63mkII > Altmann Attraction DAC (Turbo'd) > Border Patrol CU (Turbo'd) > Border Patrol P20 > ProAc D38

 
audioengr's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

Like most mass-market devices for streaming audio, the problem with Apple TV is the jitter. The internal DAC's are junk just like in the AirPort Express and Squeezebox, Sonos etc., so dont even go there. The digital outputs on the Apple products have some of the worst jitter, although the ATV is a bit better than the AirPort Express.

The point is that all of these can be great, even better than the best transports if they are reclocked with a good reclocker. I would not consider any of them without it. This JISCO is a reasonable solution, although you can do a LOT better.

Steve N.
Empirical Audio

 
u72's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

Hi, the JISCO function on my DAC does do quite a good job with the ATV regarding Jitter
Can you Suggest a Good Reclocker?

i'm mulling over getting the Digital Lens Product PSAudio Detail here :

http://boards.psaudio.com/showthread.php?t=3870

Looks like a great solution

u72

__________________

u72/Andy

Current Setup
iMac/Apple TV/Marantz KI 63mkII > Altmann Attraction DAC (Turbo'd) > Border Patrol CU (Turbo'd) > Border Patrol P20 > ProAc D38

 
BEEMB's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

Okay .. that's a worrying comment re the digital outputs. Right now that doesn't affect me, since I'm outputting via USB to an external DAC.

But, given that I'm considering purchasing the AVI ADM9.1s, from which the USB input has been removed, am I not going to get jitter problems .. ?

Chris - could you make that part of your AVI AMD comparison - I understand the first models have USB inputs and the new ones don't.

__________________

HTPC: AMD Athlon 4850e, 4GB, Vista, BD/HD-DVD into -> ADM9.1

 
The Computer Audiophile's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

Hi u72 - Check out Steve's products at Empirical Audio. Hi Pace Car is a really nice solution for this situation.

__________________

Chris Connaker

Founder
Computer Audiophile

 
The Computer Audiophile's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

Hi beemb - I can certainly look at your suggestion, but it won't be a fair comparison because the 9.1s have all kinds of improvements. Comparing one interface v. another will be tough.

Or did I not get what you are asking? It is early :-|

__________________

Chris Connaker

Founder
Computer Audiophile

 
BEEMB's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

Umm ...

A previous post mentioned that jitter from the macs digital output is pretty bad.
The original ADM9's have a USB input, so you're not using the Mac's digital output. The new ADM9.1s do not have a USB input, so I understand, so you'll have to use the Mac's digital output.
Whilst I'm sure the ADM9.1s are an improvement on the 9's, surely by losing the USB input you're not going to get the best signal from the Mac into the speaker ?

Does that make sense or am I confused ?

__________________

HTPC: AMD Athlon 4850e, 4GB, Vista, BD/HD-DVD into -> ADM9.1

 
Ashley James's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

The ADM9.1 DAC completely eliminates jitter and uses a far better DAC than the Burr Brown USB Audio codec than was in the original model.

As someone else has pointed out on this Forum, Jitter isn't really an issue and a hi fi enthusiasts wouldn't know if it was, all he'd know was the sound wasn't right, not why.

Optical digital is probably the International standard and therefore the most versatile, which is why it is all we are asked for. Very few bought the USB version and it did not dovetail with the very much more sophisticated 9.1s, so we dropped it.

I use an Apple TV, I sync it to my Laptop, I stream to it from the Laptop and a PC and I control it from either the little white remote it came with or my Touch, ether is excellent. I'd say that an ATV is like so many Apple products, you buy it wondering if you really need it and wondering how much use it will be and when you get it, you are blown away. As the front end, it's perfect and I love it. It's limited to 720 for HD and that's the same as my 36" Panasonic so it's not an issue for me.

Please remember that jitter is only an issue at either the A to D or D to A stage and that most modern DACs are sold has having a high immunity. Much more of a problem is digital hash. I did a Dem this morning to an Airport Express owner. He hated it and complained that it sounded much worse than his CD player. He had an expensive separates system yet when I played one through one of our V2 Amps to a pair of Neutron 5s, which cost £399 he reckoned it was the best sound he'd heard. It doesn't sound as good as the DAC in the ADM9.1's but it sounds all right into a power amp that can cope with a bit of unwanted crap on the signal leads. This was the reason certain manufacturers squealed that CD wasn't ready all those years ago. Some still haven't got their heads round it!

Ash

 
The Computer Audiophile's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

Hey beemb - I get what you're saying. There isn't a black & white answer about optical v. usb. There are so many variables involved. There is the source (Mac) and the DAC (AVI) to consider and a host of other things. So, one could wind up liking optical better than usb by changing any part in the audio chain.

Anyway, I will certainly run the ADM9 & 9.1s through many configurations and I am open to suggestions if anyone wants to hear anything specific.

__________________

Chris Connaker

Founder
Computer Audiophile

 
Ashley James's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

The problem with USB DACs is that they tie people to computers when most prefer to stream and Apple is all Optical anyway.

The other more important issue is that the USB standard is 16 bit and to get 24 bit out of it, you need to install drivers. Our USB was plug and play and 16 bit only. The downside of a 16 bit DAC is much higher levels of digital Hash.

As I said before, nobody wants USB and most are buying Apple to go with ADM9.1s and Apple do seem to be replacing Hi Fi as the Home Media Centre of choice, as they say it's the GUI, all noughts and one being equal. Therefore we've designed the best DAC possible and eliminated jitter completely as a precaution.

Ash

 
The Computer Audiophile's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

Wow, the BOLD get BOLDER :-)

Thanks for the opinion Ashley, but I think your talking about your market share and that doesn't necessarily equate to "nobody wants USB."

There are some very high-end USB DACs available and in fact some manufacturers have told me they would like to remove the optical input and go with USB and coax only. The fact that some very well respected companies are releasing USB DACs is a good sign that USB can be implemented very well and that people want to purchase USB DACs. Given the state of high-end sales in the US I am pretty sure these manufacturers would not create a product for "nobody."

I am on the Apple bandwagon much the same as you are, but there are places where better performing products win out. I certainly use the best product for the job whether it's an Apple product or something altogether different.

One more thing, a few manufacturers such as Benchmark, Wavelength, and Empirical Audio offer 24/96 USB DACs that don't require drivers :-)

__________________

Chris Connaker

Founder
Computer Audiophile

 
Ashley James's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

Chris

You're absolutely right that it's our experience and not that of the hi end market. However, and I've just spent some time on the phone to an extremely highly qualified Digital and RF, Defence Avionics Engineer to make sure of my facts. These are as follows.

1. That there is no technical advantage in either system (USB or Opt/coax) of extracting the data. Both can be proven to be 100% accurate.

2. That USB2 spec means a maximum cable length of 2 Metres where opto can be more than 10 metres, which is useful.

2. That PCs only tend to have USB only out.

3. That Satellite receivers, DVD, players, CD players, Xbox, PS3, TVs, Apple Computers and practically everything else has optical digital out, hence there being more demand for it

4. That the 9.1 pre has two optical sockets, but one can be ordered as coaxial. The difference is the socket only, the data can still be proved to be 100% accurate.

This is provable scientific fact and has proved unpopular in hi fi circles, but it is verifiable or I'd not have mentioned it. Therefore I've gone to great lengths on our website to give explanations of why our ears can deceive us and cited Experiments done by various (American and UK) Universities that support them.

All sort of different approaches are tried by different manufacturers and they will have their reasons, all we're doing is providing simplest, most technically elegant and best sounding hi fi system that we can for a price anyone can afford. It doesn't have pretensions, it's wysiwyg through and through. To us there is a tendency amongst serious enthusiasts to look for more complex solutions than they need, maybe that is the appeal. Certainly in the Digital age it's been very difficult for some to come to terms with the fact that the noughts and ones from a PS3 are as good as those from a fearfully expensive "high end server".

With sincere apologies for the forthright stance, but much depends on this for us.
Ash

 
The Computer Audiophile's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

As usual, thanks for the honesty and all the detail Ashley.

__________________

Chris Connaker

Founder
Computer Audiophile

 
radar2886's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

As someone who bought the USB version I can say that I am extremely happy with them, but I will be upgrading to the 9.1s when they become available in the States. Not only for the chance to play 24-bit material, but because as Ashley says the optical input is just more universal. The USB is fine for my Mac Mini, but I am pretty much shut out with everything else. I am close to getting an Apple TV in the future, but I am holding out hope that they upgrade it with a simple version of Safari and or a tv tuner. Basically I could care less about the hookup, as long as it sounds good. Ashley, just out of curosity could Firewire have been implimented in the 9.1s?

__________________

ADM9.1s ,2.0 Ghz Mac Mini, Panasonic BD-35 blu-ray player.

 
Ashley James's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

Radar I'm really pleased they've been a success and delighted you're prepared to upgrade after such a short period of ownership of the originals, which are pretty damn good in their own right. We'll be sending Tom at Overture Imports his consignment is about three weeks.

Firewire isn't practical in ADM9.1s and is less universal than USB.

I have to say that it really a pleasure to be on a site where people are so interested, friendly and tolerant of what looks dangerously like an AVI advertorial at present, I'm sure it will change soon, but on certain UK Forums the treatments metered out to ADM9 owners has been appalling. It's hard to believe that a piece of Hi Fi and one that saves money an improves performance, can be the cause of such viciousness and controversy.

It is extremely far sighted of Chris to have founded this site, it's exactly what's needed and it is the future of audio. AVI is extremely grateful to you. I really hope it's the success it deserves to be.

Ashley

 
darrenwm's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

Enough about ADM9s. We all know they're the best you can get ;)

I think I want an Apple TV but expect I'll have to hack it.

I want it to run standalone really, and I want it to get 1TB of video, photo and music off of either a NAS or USB or Firewire drive.

I want it to play my exisiting DivX vids without having to convert them all.

I know I can control it from my Touch, and slot it straight into my ADM9.1s.

I currently use a PS3 for video streaming as it plays DivX and works quite well, albeit noisy and ugly.

__________________

 
darrenwm's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

PS - Do ADM9 reclock and eliminate jitter?

__________________

 
radar2886's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

Ashley,
You guys keeping making great products and I will continue be a happy customer. I had your pre-amp before the ADM9s, and was saving up for your power amp and a pair of Duos when the ADM9s were announced. The claims seemed a little too good to be true at first, but you guys have never led me astray, so here I am one year on and a very happy fellow. I do admit I will miss the analog to digital conversion ability of the USB version. How about a standalone ADC in an amp pak sized enclosure? You are right this a cool and very useful site. Probably the biggest reason I wanted to go the computer route was because I was looking for a way to consolidate all of my digital media and it seemed the best way. It also sounds good to boot.

Phil,
I would think that the 160GB hard drive version would be enough to store a lot of your media. You can always stream other media to the device from a server. Talking to the guys at the Apple store, it sounds like it handles streaming pretty well except for larger files. I have thought about trying the hacking route, but I know when it first came out there was something in the ATV that would reset the software. I still do not know if this is the case.

__________________

ADM9.1s ,2.0 Ghz Mac Mini, Panasonic BD-35 blu-ray player.

 
darrenwm's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

This was a hint at things to come:

__________________

 
Ashley James's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

Radar - we did worry about that one until we plugged a phono stage into the Analogue in of my Martin's Macbook and digitised a few LPs using Audio Companion.

Ash

 
radar2886's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

Darren,
Sorry I called you Phil in my previous post. And you are right, that picture was a hint of things to come.

Ashley,
So I assume plugging the phono stage into the Macbook had good results for recording LPs?

__________________

ADM9.1s ,2.0 Ghz Mac Mini, Panasonic BD-35 blu-ray player.

 
Ashley James's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

Yes it does, very good ones. You need a phono stage and a download called Audio Companion, which is excellent.
And don't make vinyl into huge files, experiment with compression instead. You'll be amazed with the results you can achieve and Audio Companion puts it all into iTunes for you so that you can label all the tracks and even use the Album Artwork.

Ash

 
david1997's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

My thinking is similar to yours, Darren re. Apple TV. I plan to hold out for an 'Apple HDTV' which hopefully will include a simplified O/S and do away with the internal drive - something that has affected sales recently. Asking £70 for an extra 120gb storage when you can now buy 1tb drives for not much more is hardly going to encourage queues to form.

The video side of the Apple is also lacking compared to audio, DivX as you mentioned plus Xvid and WMV and not, as yet, HD friendly for streaming.

I plan to store/back-up everything on a QNAP TS-209 or TS-409 which (fingers crossed) could be attached to the future Apple.

By the way, and sorry if you have already mentioned this on another thread, how do you find your ADM9.1's compared to the previous 9's?

 
watchnerd's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

I just found out recently that the AppleTV supposedly has a 250 GB limit on HD upgrades, presumably due to firmware or chipset limitations.

Can anyone confirm this?

I probably have 100-150 GB of lossless music, which would leave only 100 GB for video. Not much.

__________________

MacBook Pro -> Airport Express -> Rotel RSP-1570 -> Martin Logan Sequels
MacBook Pro -> Icon HDP -> AKG K701
Apple Lossless all the way

 
The Computer Audiophile's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

That's a tough one to confirm. I do know you can now hack the ATV to allow external hard drives. This might be the ticket.

__________________

Chris Connaker

Founder
Computer Audiophile

 
Ashley James's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

I wasn't sure about Apple TV so waited until one became available on the refurb store and, as I've said before with Apple products, it's better than expected. I've found it more more use than I expected and now wouldn't be without it for the world. I like the TV program purchase, the Movie rental or purchase and being able to show my photos as well as my music, even both together. My wife and I even enjoy the screen saver that scrolls your photos across as you listen because you see photos you haven't seen for ages. TV is dire and this provides a diversion and for very little money.

Like an iPod you can sync or stream, or you can select what you put on it. With a Touch you can control it without the TV as you can from your computer. It does HDTV rentals at 720, whether it will ever do higher, I'd question. You can also stream from any computer on the network that has iTunes.

Awkward TV is the site that has all the Hacks, but I'm not sure you'll need them, better to use it for a time first. It's extremely difficult to change the HD, we're trying right now and most of the instructions we've found have been wrong, however the biggest PATA drive we could find was 250 Gig from Pyramid. The question mark with any hack seems to be that an Apple software upgrade may reset them out.

I hope this helps.

Ashley

 
u72's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

hi Ashley,
i've upgraded around 10 ATV's for friends and family if you need any help - I can upgrade yours for Free (if you pay the postage), i'm in the UK and can offer any advise you may need. and you can 'disable' any apple updates if you want - all this can be done automagically from a correctly setup patch stick in minutes. (which I could send you)

U72

__________________

u72/Andy

Current Setup
iMac/Apple TV/Marantz KI 63mkII > Altmann Attraction DAC (Turbo'd) > Border Patrol CU (Turbo'd) > Border Patrol P20 > ProAc D38

 
Ashley James's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

Thank you very much indeed! You'll be fully refunded and there's a free lunch if you're in Gloucestershire.

Ashly

 
darrenwm's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

I am always of the mentality that one can never have enough internal storage, so if I buy one it will be with the smallest internal HD, and I won't store anything on it - but serve it all up via a network.

__________________

 
cs's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

On a related topic, if the iPod Touch is used as the remote control for the Apple TV, what is the typical battery life between charges ?

 
The Computer Audiophile's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

This is a tough one to answer. The iPod touch has two modes when using remote control and the battery life is vastly different between the two. If the Touch keeps a persistent connection the battery life is OK, if this option is unchecked the battery life is really good. As far as quantifying the time I have no idea because I just put it in a dock and don't worry about it.

__________________

Chris Connaker

Founder
Computer Audiophile

 
Ashley James's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

I'm using mine for email, planning routes, looking at websites and controlling ATV and have to charge it about once a day. I've only had it a week and am fascinated by it!

Ash

 
darrenwm's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

I'm in love with my Touch too.

I tend to charge everyday, so I'd say the battery isn't fantastic, but please consider it's permanently connected to my WiFi network doing remote duties, internet, VNC, email, etc.

I've bought a dock and a mains charger though, so I can leave it on the coffee table like the Sonos or SB cradles, instead of charging it in a computer.

Charging it like this makes it more like a proper remote control, rather than a little gadget.

__________________

 
BEEMB's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

Wouldn't it be great if the Mac Mini really was the perfect media centre. Its not.

For example, Apple TV is great but a Mac Mini is more flexible. You can't download HD movies from I Tunes and play them on the Mini due to HDCP preventing this over DVI (so I understand) but you can on the Apple TV .. Mind you, even then it's not full HD - limited bit rates and current broadband limitations mean it'll be a long time before we're download video footage to match Blu Ray.

I want to get rid of all my gear to be left with just my mini, hard disk and AVI's ... but wouldn't it be great if AVI has some matching but smaller centres and rear speakers to go with those great stereo speakers.

Wonder whether Apple will ever put a Blu Ray drive in a Mac. Maybe I should some research rather than lazily asking questions !!

Probably going a bit off topic here but it just got me thinking. Wish my mini just had some more grunt and a blu ray drive for HD video. It'd be perfect.

__________________

HTPC: AMD Athlon 4850e, 4GB, Vista, BD/HD-DVD into -> ADM9.1

 
cs's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

I will almost certainly end up getting an Apple TV as my primary music source, and about the only limitation I can see is the lack of an internal optical drive to allow importing of CDs directly, rather than via an external Mac or PC.

The Mac Mini solves this of course, but the downside is the internal fan, and the fact that it is considerably more expensive. As I already use an iMac for my home computing, the indirect CD importing issue is only a minor one.

I would be using the ATV purely as a music server, so the video aspects wouldn't be important to me.

 
Ashley James's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

We've got a Mac Mini and to hear the fan you have to pick it up and clamp it to you ear with Gaffer tape, it's very quiet indeed!

Let's face it, after hi fi all this stuff is a steal and often better quality. Just go and buy one and enjoy it. I can't believe how much I'm enjoying a Touch and I'm 62 years old. My uncle is 96 and he's got an older model, but neither of us have Skateboards

Ash

 
cs's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

Ash,

Will the iPod Touch also control a Mini in the same way as it does with the Apple TV ?

Chris.

 
darrenwm's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

Ash,

I expect the Touch controls iTunes on the Mini just has it does on an other computer.

However, as asked above, will it control FrontRow in the same fashion as the AppleTV?

__________________

 
Ashley James's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

I don't think it will control Front Row, but you don't need it to because Front Row doesn't stream, iTunes does that. If you are streaming and you open Front Row only the digital output on the computer works.

The standard remote App. controls your music, Movies, TV programs and your photos from iPhoto via iTunes.

Ash

 
Innertuber's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

"My uncle is 96 and he's got an older model"

Go Unc! Playboy or Penthouse? He sounds like my role model.

 
Ashley James's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

He married a 19 year old when he was 45 and it sure as hell p----d my mother off!

Ash

 
Innertuber's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

Oh man, I bet it did. He's not pals with Bill Wyman is he?

 
BEEMB's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

Maybe I should shut up with my video posts. This is computer AUDIOPHILE after all .. just dreaming.............

Just put my whole system (exc Mac) on AV Forums - hoping to see if I can raise enough for those ADM9.1s ... .. . .

__________________

HTPC: AMD Athlon 4850e, 4GB, Vista, BD/HD-DVD into -> ADM9.1

 
Innertuber's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

I think the video and TV stuff is of great interest to many.

Good luck on the sale and the new gear hunt.

 
rockrabbit's picture
  Joined: .:. .:. Comments:

Curious to know something about Apple TV....

Is it better to leave it on all the time or came I as I currently do, plug it into a switched outlet on my line conditioner and power the unit off and on as the need arises?

many thanks!

__________________

Drew.

Totem Model 1 Signature's << AudioQuest KE-4 Double Bi-wire << QuickSilver Mini Mite Mono Blocks << AudioQuest Niagara << AES AE-3 DJH Pre << AudioQuest Niagara << Bryston BDA-1 DAC << AudioQuest Optilink-5 << Airport Express << iPhone (remote) << Mac Mini (server) << Oyen Digital Raid 1 box - 2 x 1TB via FW 800

 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.