• C.A.P.S. v2.0

    Early in 2010 the original Computer Audiophile Pocket Server design was published on CA. At the time I wasn't sure if readers would be interested in building their own servers. I thought it would be a great thing if many computer audiophiles used the exact same music server. This could ease troubleshooting and enable the sharing of successful tweaks among all C.A.P.S. users. I had no idea the C.A.P.S. server would become incredibly popular among computer audiophiles. Many CA readers commented on the original build with suggestions to make it better while others were delighted someone else had done all the work. I was very happy to read both types of comments. After the original Pocket Server debuted I began fielding questions about it at every computer audio seminar I attended. A few months later in true computer audiophile fashion everyone was asking about the next C.A.P.S. server. The inquiries were a double-edged sword. I was thrilled so many people expressed interest in the server. At the same time pressure was building to create something better. After nearly 18 months I believe I have something better. It is with great pleasure that I reveal the Computer Audiophile Pocket Server version 2.0!




     

    C.A.P.S. Version 2.0

    I was originally going to release version 1.5 as a minor update to the first Pocket Server. I was underwhelmed by some of the "upgrades" available from computer component manufacturers and couldn't justify calling it version 2.0. However, I have since scrapped the design of v1.5, wiped the slate clean, and built new version 2.0. This is not a minor upgrade to version 1.0link. I have tentative plans for version 3.0 but readers should not hold their breath waiting for this version. The current plan is very different, complicated, and will need a new set of requirements. Thus, if you like v2.0 don't wait for v3.0 as you might be disappointed and waiting quite awhile.

    My goal in publishing C.A.P.S. v2.0 is the same as it was for the original Pocket Server, "[T]o put together a hardware and software music server solution that I would actually use and the Computer Audiophile readers could actually use. I would do the leg work, test & listen to everything, and provide the information for CA readers to put together the exact same music server."

    Readers unfamiliar with history behind these servers are likely asking why the name Pocket Server? Here is a brief explanation copied from a comment response to version 1.0. "The title does not reference the literal size of the music server. The name Pocket Server is no less accurate than the name Compact Car…Along the way this server was named the Pocket Server by a colleague who was very surprise at its small size when I pulled it out of my carry-on luggage. The server is a bit larger today than it was at that time but the name hasn't changed. This colleague named the server because it was so small not because it actually fits into a pocket. I elected to keep the name, going with the spirit of the name not the letter of the name."

    Many CA readers realize standard off-the-shelf computers don't make the best high-end audio music servers. Sure a regular Dell built with nothing but price in mind, with commodity parts and software from any company willing to fork over enough cash, can work as a music server. Such a computer is usually good as a proof of concept machine but literally nothing else that has to do with high-end audio. Don't believe me? Try it and report back in the comments section below. The prevalence of USB DACs in high-end audio has made the need for a quality computer even greater. A quick glance at most computers built today usually reveals a few internal USB hubs to which devices like IR receivers, Bluetooth controllers, keyboards, trackpads, memory card readers, and built-in cameras are all attached. Most users have no clue computer are built this way. Computer audiophiles frequently avoid using external USB hubs like the plague. Little do they know they're using internal USB hubs for their USB DACs. Evidence of one problem related to this can be found by using a USB DAC with a pre unibody MacBook Pro. If the DAC is not connected to the correct USB port the listener will experience audio drop-outs. The trouble stems from several internal devices sharing the same USB bus, namely the keyboard in this situation. In layman's terms there are too many cars on the highway. The audio car should be in the dedicated high occupancy vehicle lane cruising by itself. In reality this is rarely the case.

    Throughout the history of consumer electronics the massive mainstream consumer base selects a technology because of its convenience. The niche high-end audio industry perfects this frequently less than desirable technology. Think optical S/PDIF - TosLink. Audiophiles are always striving to improv technology whether it be turntables, CD players, or music servers. The C.A.P.S. v2.0 design is no exception. This is a USB based design that's unlike almost every other music server. C.A.P.S. v2.0 addresses potential USB issues by providing the USB audio data its own autobahn in addition to other leading edge customizations. The performance and sonic quality of Pocket Server 2.0 has truly surprised me. I believe the Computer Audiophile Pocket Server version 2.0 is better than version 1.0 in every respect. Yes, that unequivocally means sound quality. Period.

     

    Requirements

    The requirements for version 2.0 are identical to the original Pocket Server. The requirements are both objective and subjective. When necessary I'll do my best to explain how or why my component selections meet these criteria.


    1. Absolutely silent.

    2. Capable of great sound.

    3. Great looking.

    4. No moving parts.

    5. Fairly inexpensive.

    6. No legacy components.

    7. Easy to operate.

      1. Directly or

      2. Remotely



    8. Easy to assemble / install

      1. Assembly / installation by one's self or

      2. Assembly / installation by local computer shop, son, daughter, neighbor, or friend.



    9. Small size.

    10. Low power consumption.

    11. Low heat.

    12. Accept an add-in card for audio or additional capabilities. Hardware & Software must accept appropriate add-in cards.

    13. Play 16/44.1, 24/44.1, 24/88.2, 24/96, 24/176.4, and 24/192 all bit perfect.



     

    Hardware

    Motherboard
    The main component of every computer is the motherboard. Selecting the right one is the toughest part of designing a server. It's very easy to go overboard with features and wind up with a board that requires so much cooling it sounds like the Space Shuttle. On the the end of the continuum are the boards without any features. These low power featureless boards are interesting but not for a C.A.P.S. design. My motherboard selection for C.A.P.S. v2.0 is the $167 Jetway NF96FL-525-LF. One thing to note about this board is its large heat sink. There is no way to use a full height PCI card, even with a riser, without hitting the heat sink. The main features of this board are a dual core 1.8 GHz Intel Atom D525 fanless processor, capacity for four GB of RAM, Integrated graphics, PCI slot for expansion, an eSATA port, and built-in DC 12-volt power. The dual core 64-bit Atom processor is a major improvement over the original server design. C.A.P.S. v1 was very close to maxing its slower single core 32-bit Atom processor. Like the previous design this processor requires no fan to assist in dispersing heat and satisfies the no moving parts, absolutely silent, low power, and low heat criteria. The other critical component for a silent fanless design is built-in DC power. This enables use of a small external power supply that connects to the rear of the server. Finding a "regular" fanless power supply is not impossible but can severely limit one's case options due to size and heat dissipation. The Jetway's support of 4Gb of memory is another major improvement. Mainstream operating systems and applications continue to take "advantage" of more memory every release. The eSATA port on this motherboard was one of the features that elevated this board over all others. I realize not every computer audiophile has or wants a Network Attached Storage (NAS) device. These users require direct attached storage. It has been my experience that the speed of eSATA disks is a great benefit to music servers. The annoyance of waiting for an external hard drive, even if it's only a second or two, can drive users nuts over time. Using eSATA this annoyance should be reduced considerably. The remaining feature that is imperative to the C.A.P.S. v2.0 design is the PCI expansion slot. The PCI slot may seem like old technology when compared to new blazing fast PCI-express slots. However, many PCI-express cards such as the Lynx AES16e are actually bridged PCI cards made to work in PCI-express slots. The advantage of PCI-express may be moot for most music servers. Plus, C.A.P.S. v2 requires a PCI slot for its superior USB implementation discussed elsewhere.
           


     

    Ancillary Components
    The remaining ancillary components aren't as exciting but required nonetheless. The memory used for version 2.0 is 2x2GB (4Gb total) modules of DDR2 667 from Transcend. The motherboard front side bus runs at 667 as well. The fact that this memory is standard size as opposed to "laptop" size memory is a plus. It should be easier to find other options and cost less than the smaller modules. There were a few options when selecting the power supply for this C.A.P.S. server. I ruled out using a linear supply for many reasons such as cost, size, complexity, scarcity, and logicality given the standard onboard switching power supplies. The three main PSU options were either 60, 80, or 102 Watts. This server is not power hungry so I followed the less is more path by selecting the Casetronic PW-12V5A-L5 60w supply. The solid state drive selected for version 2.0 will probably surprise many readers. I usually select OCZ drives as they are my standard go-to SSDs. This time I selected the very inexpensive $100 64GB Micro Center brand drive. The Micro Center drives are manufactured by ADATA using the SandForce 1222 Controller. I've used this very good performing drive over the last few months without any issues.
           


    The one piece of C.A.P.S. v2.0 that remains unchanged from v1.0 is the $320 Origenae M10 computer case. I simply haven't found a better case for the job that meets all the requirements. The M10 is great looking, small, and is compatible with PCI add-in cards. There are literally hundreds of computer cases available that could have been used for this design. Unfortunately almost all of them are hideous looking compared to the M10. The Origenae M10 has form and function.
           

     


     

    Audiophile Add-ins
    The next two pieces of the C.A.P.S. v2.0 puzzle will never be found in an off-the-shelf Dell, HP, Apple, etc. The SOtM tX-USB and SOtM In-Line SATA Power Noise Filter are as far removed from standard commodity computer hardware as it gets. The inline SATA noise filter connects directly to a hard drive whether it's solid state or standard spinning disk. Regular SATA data and SATA power cables are then connected to the filter. No special cables required. The installation could not be simpler. The SOtM filter has individual 12V, 5V, and 3.3V RF noise filters in addition to ripple noise filters. I was skeptical at first but after seeing objective measurements detailing the positive effect this filter has on a computer system and placing this filter in the new C.A.P.S. server I'm sold. Add to cart for all my servers. The SOtM tX-USB is a half height PCI to USB card that fits perfectly in the Origenae M10 case as it's delivered with both short and long PCI trim plates. The design of the SOtM tX-USB is an all-out-assault on PCI to USB cards. The tX-USB has its own power line noise filter, individual ultra low noise regulators to power up to two attached USB devices, onboard ultra low jitter clock, onboard PCI host controller, and separate power connector. This enables the card to be powered by an external linear or battery PSU. Many computer audiophiles like to experiment with cutting the power leg from USB cables or special ordering cables without the power leg. The tX-USB has an easily accessed manual switch, next to the USB ports on the card, that enables/disables sending power over the USB cable. Users will have to check their DACs to determine if USB power is required. Some USB DACs require USB power even if the DAC itself is powered by a separate supply. The tX-USB is 100% compliant with USB 2.0 Hi-Speed and all prior USB specifications and speeds.
     


    Low quantity high quality components are never inexpensive. The SOtM components are no exception. The inline SATA noise filter retails for $65 and the tX-USB PCI card rings up at $339. Powering the tX-USB with the Jetway motherboard requires a SATA to LP4 Molex adapter (Photo 1) (Photo 2) as the motherboard ships with two SATA only power connectors. The $6 Nippon Labs SATA 15 Pin Male to Molex 4 pin female adapter should work great with C.A.P.S. v2.0 and the tX-USB. During the build process I was itching to get the server running so I created my own cable using spare parts from my music server graveyard. I recommend simply ordering the inexpensive adapter. Much easier and better looking. As a side note, Linux users will be happy to learn the tX-USB PCI card supports Hi-Speed USB 2.0 devices when used with the correct kernel.

    The most likely question CA readers are asking themselves as they read this article is, "How does it sound?" I unequivocally state the SOtM products improved the sound quality of my system when placed into the C.A.P.S. v2.0 server. In fact I was so interested to hear if these products made a difference I placed the tX-USB in the server then connected a Wavelength Audiolink WaveLink converter to a main motherboard USB port instead of the tX-USB. Old habits are hard to break. I was sorely disappointed as I heard absolutely no change with only the tX-USB installed and my USB converter to the main board. After a couple tracks I mentally retraced my steps and realized my error. Like any wise Golfer I gave myself a mulligan. With the WaveLink connected to the tX-USB (power enabled as required by WaveLink) I listened to the same tracks that I had played using the previous misconfiguration. I was pleasantly surprised to hear such a nice difference. I understand what has gone into engineering the SOtM components but I also understand far better how computers operate. How can there be a sonic difference? USB is USB isn't it? Bit transparent is bit transparent isn't it? Unfortunately there's much more to computer audio than meets the eye or the ear. While working on C.A.P.S. v2.0 a CA reader posted the following link to a discussion on Audio Asylumlink. The discussion details some of the problems associated with USB audio and the difficulties in addressing the issues. A phrase that comes to mind after reading such informative discussions is, "The more you know, the more you know you don't know."
           

           


     

    Optional Add-ins
    FireWire DAC users are also in luck with C.A.P.S. v2.0. The PCI USB card can be excluded from the design by substituting an $8 SYBA SD-VIA-FW1E1H PCI FireWire card. This card works perfect with the Weiss Engineering DAC202. The total savings is $331.
    Manufacturer Linklink | Newegg Product Pagelink

    I did not include an internal ROM drive in Pocket Server version 2.0. If needed one can use an external drive or a $90 Panasonic SATA Slim drive or a $169 Sony Optiarc Blu-ray drive. Many slot loading drives feature drive eject buttons that are not compatible with the Origenae case. Please look closely before purchasing another drive. A $5 mini SATA cable is likely required for the slot loading optical drives.
    Panasonic SATA Slim drivelink | Sony Optiarc Blu-ray drivelink | Mini SATA Cablelink

     

    Software

    Operating System
    During the design of the original Pocket Server I researched and tested a few different operating systems including Windows 7 and Voyage Linux. I've closely followed Voyage's development since that time and noted the rise of other Linux based servers aimed at audiophiles. Given the C.A.P.S. v2.0 requirements and the fact that companies such as Simple Designlink can design and build a better Linux system than I ever could I elected to bypass Linux for the Pocket Server design once more time. Linux is great but like everything in life it has an appropriate time and place. Linux is not the right fit for the C.A.P.S. v2.0 design.

    I selected Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 64-bit as the version 2.0 operating system. Most of the same reasons used for the v1.0 design hold true for v2.0. Windows 7 meets all the software based requirements for a Pocket Server. Quoting the C.A.P.S. v1.0 article, Windows 7, "[I]s capable of great sound, [is] a current OS, easy to operate and install, works with more hardware than any other OS, and is capable of bit perfect playback at all required sample rates when configured properly." CA readers familiar with the original design will likely wonder why I selected the 64-bit version when previously I saw no benefit to a 64-bit OS. The main reason I went with the 64-bit OS is I wanted the new C.A.P.S. design to be forward "thinking" for lack of a better term. It's clear the personal computer industry is moving toward 64-bit hardware and 64-bit operating systems. In fact most hardware has supported a 64-bit architecture for years. The C.A.P.S. v2.0 hardware is no exception, it fully supports 64-bit software.

    Playback / Library Management Application
    J River Media Center 16link is by far the best choice for the playback application running on C.A.P.S. v2.0. JRMC has the best mix of file format support, good graphical user interface, database functionality, customization, and most importantly audio output modes such as WASAPI - Event Style, WASAPI, Kernel Streaming, and ASIO. In addition to a great application J River has very good support for the computer audiophile community. I recently had the opportunity to visit the guys at J River, once again, and test the new $FREE Android remote control app Gizmolink. Readers with Android devices would be remiss not to give Gizmo a shot. I really like the functionality of the app and its ease of use. Currently iPhone users can control JRMC via a plain web interface or use an app such as BitRemote ($10)link.

    After everything was installed and configured I began paring down the Windows operating system including applications and services. I uninstalled nearly all of the Windows "Features" including Games, Indexing, Search, Printing, etc. Within the Windows System Properties - Performance Options I selected "Adjust for best performance". this disables all the animations and graphically intense pieces of the operating system. I also disabled System Restore, Windows Defender, Windows Firewall, and Windows Update. Obviously there is no anti-virus software on the C.A.P.S server. I also removed everything from the startup folder and Registry startup entries via MSCONFIG. As a precautionary measure I installed the Google Chrome Internet browser for the rare times I need to find album art online. This browser appears more secure than many of the Microsoft Internet Explorer versions.

    A default Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit installation has over 140 services some of which run in the background whether or not they are required by the user. The C.A.P.S v2.0 server is currently running 33 of 144 possible services. It's certainly possible to stop or disable more of the remaining 33 services. It has been my experience that these remaining services provide a good mix of stability and software usability. I've included a list of services, status, and startup type in the document below.

    · C.A.P.S. v2 Services PDFlink

     

    Comparison C.A.P.S. Version 1.0 and 2.0

    Comparing the original Pocket Server to version 2.0 reveals this new design as the clear winner. Not only is v2.0 less expensive it offers better performance and sound quality. The motherboard, CPU, and RAM received a needed upgrade that leaves v1.0 in the dust without requiring a massive cooling apparatus or spinning fans. The most critical improvement to v2.0 is the replacement of the Lynx AES16 with the SOtM tX-USB card. This card in combination with many of the new USB DACs should make CA readers very happy. Running a USB DAC from a C.A.P.S v1.0 built-in USB port simply doesn't measure up. C.A.P.S. v2.0 is also a great system for FireWire users who will save $339 off the USB server price.

    After publishing the original Pocket Server design a few readers asked why not simply purchase a Mac Mini for $699 and call it a day? A Mac Mini doesn't meet the stated requirements of the C.A.P.S. design. Absolute Silence, no moving parts, and the ability to use an add-in card for expansion are not possible with a Mac Mini. Plus, the C.A.P.S server has increased computer audiophiles' engagement in this wonderful hobby through many user tweaks and customizations simply unavailable under OS X and a Mac Mini. Some people like to get more involved in the server part of the system while other would rather set it and forget it by using a Mac Mini. There's no right or wrong here. Both approaches have nothing to do with one's enjoyment of music or one's credibility as a music loving audiophile. It's even more likely that many CA readers enjoy both types of systems. I currently enjoy a highly tweaked C.A.P.S. v2.0 server and at the same time a Mac server, a Linux server, and hopefully soon a Meridian-Soolooslink server. This is all about furthering one's enjoyment of great music and interest in high-end audio. Nobody should care how it's done.

     

    Wrap-Up

    CASH-ListThere you have it the Computer Audiophile Pocket Server version 2.0. I sincerely hope this server design accomplishes my goal of being a hardware and software solution everyone can and will use. I'll never make a penny from this design and I'm not looking to publish a design that competes with an existing manufacturer. This design is first and foremost for all the Computer Audiophile readers who've shown such dedication to our terrific hobby and encouraged me to release an updated C.A.P.S. server. I thought about readers' likes, dislikes, and requirements throughout the entire design process. That said I didn't compromise any part of the design by sinking to the lowest common denominator. That's simply not what Computer Audiophile is about. I'm very excited to read user comments about the design, good and bad, and to see users start building their own v2.0 servers. It really has been my pleasure to design, build, and reveal the new Computer Audiophile Pocket Server version 2.0.

     

     

     

     



    The Computer Audiophile Pocket Server v2.0 piece by piece



     

     

     
    Comments 404 Comments
    1. Paul.Raulerson's Avatar
      Paul.Raulerson -
      Nice job Chris. <br />
      -Paul<br />
    1. Elprior's Avatar
      Elprior -
      Well done Chris !<br />
      <br />
      Elp
    1. elevi2's Avatar
      elevi2 -
      Hi Chris,<br />
      <br />
      Thanks for the great article, yep that's another opportunity for an upgrade! <br />
      I am trying to quantify the speed improvement between the CAPS versions. One possible tool in the JRiver JRMark benchmark utility (help menu).<br />
      <br />
      For example my notebook JRMark (version 16.0.116) is 1508 <br />
      While the caps ver 1 JRMark is about 260<br />
      Can you pls share with us the JRMark of the CAPS 2 ?<br />
      <br />
      Thx<br />
      Eli<br />
      <br />
      <br />
    1. SBright's Avatar
      SBright -
      Thanks
    1. audiophilesavant's Avatar
      audiophilesavant -
      Can you comment on the sound quality of the CAPS 2.0 versus<br />
      <br />
      1)MacBook Air, iTunes, battery power<br />
      2)MacBook Air, iTunes, Amarra or Pure Music, battery power<br />
      3)MacBook Air, iTunes, AC power<br />
      4)MacBook Air, iTunes, Amarra or Pure Music, AC power<br />
      <br />
      <br />
    1. Wavelength's Avatar
      Wavelength -
      Chris,<br />
      <br />
      Thanks for all the hard work... but I think everyone will agree on the CAPS systems you should let us determine if it warrants a CASH Suggested Hardware award <br />
      <br />
      I think you should also have someone look at Linux for it... you lost me at Win7.<br />
      <br />
      Thanks<br />
      Gordon
    1. Hellen's Avatar
      Hellen -
      Thank you so much! Wow.. When it costs thousands of dollars to buy a music server and you can make profit from this kind of system, you simply share this knowledge with everyone else. I cannot appreciate your generosity and effort enough!<br />
      <br />
      One question. If I want to watch a movie out of this pc, do I need to add some kind of graphic card or HDMI port ? I have a htpc to serve as a music server which has a fan. I want to replace the htpc with this pc, but I wonder if I should be able to watch a movie from this pc (Streaming or from NAS not from an internal DVD, I have an external blue-ray DVD player). It doesn't seem to have a HDMI, either. I hope to have one PC to serve as a movie and music server.
    1. Amused's Avatar
      Amused -
      If I were still a PC guy (long since), this would be an appealing little server. <br />
      It's too bad that you're limited to 4 GB with the Jetway, even if you are just running J. River.
    1. Dennis Graves's Avatar
      Dennis Graves -
      Chris, you have obviously done a great job of putting together a new CAPs 2. But, for us non-techie types, the big question is whether we could get sound as good spending $1200 or so on a MAC. I have a Berkeley Audio Alpha DAC and soon will get the BAD USB converter. With those units and my AES/EBU Stealth Varidig Sextet digital link, I think I am well positioned to use USB for top notch sound. Do you think the violins would sound clearer and more liquid and appealing (as in real life) on the CAPs 2 or a MAC?
    1. extracampine's Avatar
      extracampine -
      Hi Chris,<br />
      <br />
      Great article, thanks. I have three questions about this setup just now;<br />
      <br />
      1. Is there a GPU built into the motherboard? Will this be powerful enough to render covers etc in JRiver? The reason I ask is that when I browse covers in JRiver (Sony Vaio laptop) in the "cover wall" mode it's a bit slow and jerky when rendering all of the covers.<br />
      <br />
      2. What are the video-out options? I have a 24" TFT monitor at a resolution of 1920 x 1200 ; would the CAPS be fine with this? The Vaio's output to the monitor is slightly blurred for some reason.<br />
      <br />
      3. Is this wifi-enabled? I use an iPad as a remote control, and JRiver would have to be able to utilise its DLNA server & renderer abilities to allow this.<br />
      <br />
      BW<br />
      <br />
      Dan
    1. audiozorro's Avatar
      audiozorro -
      [Quote] The next two pieces of the C.A.P.S. v2.0 puzzle will never be found in an off-the-shelf Dell, HP, Apple, etc. The SOtM tX-USB and SOtM In-Line SATA Power Noise Filter are as far removed from standard commodity computer hardware as it gets.<br />
      <br />
      While working on C.A.P.S. v2.0 a CA reader posted the following link to a discussion on Audio Asylum . The discussion details some of the problems associated with USB audio and the difficulties in addressing the issues.<br />
      <br />
      FireWire DAC users are also in luck with C.A.P.S. v2.0. The PCI USB card can be excluded from the design by substituting an $8 SYBA SD-VIA-FW1E1H PCI FireWire card. This card works perfect with the Weiss Engineering DAC202. The total savings is $331. [End Quote]<br />
      <br />
      Chris, great work and write-up, however the above had me wondering:<br />
      <br />
      1. Mitigating the sonic problems with USB in the computer require a $331 solution whereas firewire has no similar sonic problems and an $8 card is all that is necessary. <br />
      <br />
      2. The USB ports built-in any and all computers are sonically compromised and require something like the SOtM tX-USB and SOtM In-Line SATA Power Noise Filter in order to achieve the ultimate in sonics.<br />
      <br />
      3. While USB to SPDIF solutions may do an excellent job in mitigating the sonic problems inherent in SPDIF and allow legacy DACs to be used, the best solution will generally be using something like the SOtM tX-USB and SOtM In-Line SATA Power Noise Filter in any computer with an excellent USB DAC.<br />
      <br />
      4. How any of the above fits in with the upcoming Auralitti L1000 File Player which claims AES/EBU output for best low noise interface to DAC or would the L1000 be sonically superior with USB or firewire?<br />
    1. jrobbins50's Avatar
      jrobbins50 -
      Chris, this is most interesting and CAPS off to you for the hard work. <br />
      <br />
      Since I use the Bel Canto DAC3.3, I need the RCA output. In CAPS1, I've been successfully using the ASUS Xonar Essence ST audio card. Is this incompatible with CAPS2? I also have the Broadcom BCM970012 hardware decoder installed to enhance video ouput in my CAPS1. Is this, too, also incompatible with CAPS2? (I probably can answer my own question on this latter point, as I see no HDMI or DVI output on the motherboard). Finally, is it possible to use the M350 case (http://www.logicsupply.com/products/m350), which I use for CAPS1 and although not anywhere near as pretty, is incredibly inexpensive.<br />
      <br />
      Thanks in advance for your answers. Cheers. JCR
    1. Paul.Raulerson's Avatar
      Paul.Raulerson -
      I would suggest there are some people who are constitutionally unable to bring themselves to buy or use Macs, and Chris' CAPS server nicely fills a need for them. Besides, another generation or so, and it will probably be possible to load MacOS on it anyway... <br />
      <br />
      -Paul<br />
    1. Hellen's Avatar
      Hellen -
      Hi, JCR,<br />
      <br />
      You may have an aswer to my question. Is the Broadcom card you put is to enhance the graphics? Can I use this PC with the card to connect a HD TV (55") and use the pc as my movie server as well? (I keep movie files in a NAS as well as music files). <br />
      <br />
      I also wondered about the case. Did you build CAPS1.0 with this inexpenseive case?
    1. Hellen's Avatar
      Hellen -
      Hi, JCR,<br />
      <br />
      I checked the logicsupply site to see if your card and case are compatible with the new motherboard. <br />
      <br />
      1. The case is compatible.<br />
      2. The Broadcom card - the site lists BCM970015 as tested AND compatible with the new motherboard. <br />
      <br />
      With this Broadcam card, can I watch a movie out of this PC?
    1. jrobbins50's Avatar
      jrobbins50 -
      Hellen, I did successfully build, and have been happily using, CAPS1 in the cheap M350 case. Video is still a problem even with the Broadcom card.<br />
      <br />
      Subject to correction by Chris, it seems that you couldn't attach HDMI or DVI to CAPS2. The Broadcom card is just a little board that plugs into the PCI-e slot. It has no HDMI or DVI socket to plug into. Seems to me that the new motherboard supports only Legacy VGA out, if your monitor can take that in.<br />
      <br />
      CAPS2, it would seem, is a more audio purist version, which is great for those with USB DACs.<br />
      <br />
      Chris, I thought that USB only supported up to 96/24. Is my understanding incorrect, such that I could use a USB to SPDIF bridge to my Bel Canto DAC and still get 192/24, as I am getting out of CAPS1 with the Xonar Essence ST? JCR
    1. SBright's Avatar
      SBright -
      Hi Chris,<br />
      <br />
      What changes if any are you running within J River now that you're outputting with USB?
    1. Audio_ELF's Avatar
      Audio_ELF -
      Put simply: USB is NOT limited to 24/96 but some<br />
      USB devices are limited.
    1. Quest's Avatar
      Quest -
      One thing that got my attention was the SOTM usb card which I may buy to try.. but wondering with all the number of products available, how far do we have to go to isolate the PC?<br />
      <br />
      IIRC the Wavelength Wavelink is already an isolator and clock and yet placing another device infront of it still helps..<br />
      <br />
      I wonder what happens if you get the USB card AND buy something like the Acoustic Revive RUI-1 which gives 1 more layer of filtering BEFORE the Wavelink.<br />
      <br />
      http://www.acoustic-revive.com/japanese/rui1/rui1_01.html
    1. 1audio's Avatar
      1audio -
      Let me provide some light on the SoTM USB interface. What is does is provide a separate USB interface back to the PCI bus. It runs independently of the other USB interfaces in the system. If you check most modern computer systems you will find a number of devices connected to the USB root hub. Some systems may have two root hubs but many will have a number of USB devices connected to that hub. This causes contention among the devices that use that USB interface. <br />
      <br />
      The SoTM provides a separate USB interface that only has the device(s) on it that you attach. The PCI connection provides direct access to the CPU and Memory of the system with throughput of at least 133 MBytes per second, much more than any audio device could ever need. In the process they made the whole interface to audio standards. The low jitter 20 MHz clock is an essential feature if you have a (shudder) adaptive USB audio interface like many still do. It can't hurt with an asynchronous USB audio interface even if it doesn't help. <br />
      <br />
      Also the USB power issue is addressed in several ways. First the power for the card is derived from the 12V supply, not from the PCI buss. its well filtered and regulated so its pretty clean. Its also possible to switch the USB power off if your interface doesn't need it which will remove another noise source. Its not fully isolated in the "galvanic" sense, the data and ground connections are still connected to the host computer's ground system. <br />
      <br />
      A USB isolator that can handle USB2 high speed is still a rarity. As best I can figure out the Acoustic Revive device doesn't handle USB High Speed yet, limiting it to 96K and below at best. A quick check at the Analog Devices web site http://www.analog.com/en/interface/digital-isolators/products/index.html#USB_2.0_Compatible confirms they don't have devices that go above 12 Mbps (Full Speed) yet. <br />
      <br />
      Here is some results from my testing of the SoTM SATA filter : http://auraliti.com/uploads/SATA_and_Fan_Filter_info.pdf The SoTM fan filter is similar if you need a fan in your system. Sorry, it won't reduce the acoustic noise of the fan.
  •